34 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 18 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Safecracking

By       (Page 2 of 10 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   1 comment
Message Richard Girard
Become a Fan
  (40 fans)

Just as it was a lackadaisical attitude towards security that permitted Mr. Feynman to earn a reputation as a "safecracker" at Los Alamos during the Manhattan Project, and a similar attitude towards computer security that is at the root of most of our computer security problems today; it is a lack of our own system of mental security that permits so many conservative rabble-rousers like Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh to be believed by so many Americans in all walks of life today. This laziness in turn leads to far too many Americans voting against their own economic best interest on the basis of one or two non-economic issues, for example abortions and guns.


I think that with a minimum amount of work, we can make ourselves beings of rational action, rather than irrational reaction. Let's see if I can help you install firewall and anti-virus programs in your mental processes, before your minds get swamped by another attack of propagandistic malware , worms, Trojans, and other factual distortions.


I should begin with the most important concept for establishing a firewall against any propaganda: skepticism. The most essential and consistently missing element in skepticism is epistemology; "The branch of philosophy that studies the nature of knowledge, its presuppositions and foundations, and its extent and validity." (The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Third Edition copyright 1992 by Houghton Mifflin Company.)


To put it more simply, in a context that you can use everyday, it is the difference between knowledge and belief or opinion.


Propaganda is very much dependent upon belief, rather than concrete knowledge, in order to work properly. The great problem with belief is that it does not have to be based upon the truth, only upon those things that fit either comfortably within, or reinforce our weltanschauung, our comprehensive philosophy of the world or human life. For this reason, lies, half-truths, distortions, and hyperbole work every bit as well, and sometimes better, than independently verifiable, testable data. If we are receiving the information we want or expect, then we tend to accept it without question, like the mother who cannot believe that her little darling (who denies all wrongdoing) is the terror of the neighborhood. All other information is rejected simply because it runs contrary to our belief system.


There are some people who take advantage of this human failing by intentionally feeding into the belief system of certain people in order to manipulate them in one direction or another on a given subject. In ancient Athens they were called "demagogues," meaning "people's leader," implying that they led and manipulated the "mob," the lower classes of the city-state. In modern America, they are called Fox News opinion makers.


We must always be skeptical of any and all information that we receive--regardless of source--remembering that it is human nature to put the best possible light on our own actions, or on the actions or pronouncements of those we admire, so that people have the best opinion of us that is possible at the moment. The number of people who are able to take the long term view of the value of their reputations, as well as those who place the good of others ahead of their own because it is right--people like the men who pledged "our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor;" in America's Declaration of Independence--are a rare breed.


A favorite trick of the propagandist when he is exploiting belief is to attempt to focus the public's uninformed attention on a narrow range of communities, to the exclusion of all others. In Nazi Germany, it was the trade unionists, Communists, Socialists, and the Jews, who were chosen by the Nazis to be the focus of the German People's anger. These groups were painted by Hitler and his cronies as being directly responsible for the infamous "stab in the back" that had caused Germany to lose the First World War.


Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Richard Girard Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Richard Girard is a polymath and autodidact whose greatest desire in life is to be his generations' Thomas Paine. He is an FDR Democrat, which probably puts him with U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders in the current political spectrum. His answer to (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Great Enemy of the Truth

Into a Thousand Pieces

The Communist Takeover of America

The Judgment of History; Or Why the Breaking of the Oligarchs Avenges President Kennedy's Assassination--Part One

Social Capitalism

Honi Soit Qui Mal Y Pense

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend