Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 4 Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 4 (10 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   2 comments

Life Arts

Revolution Goes Global: Elysium (2013)

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 2 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H4 8/10/13

Become a Fan
  (18 fans)
- Advertisement -

Murdoch's NY Post gets downright frothy over the film.  Kyle Smith may have broken his keyboard banging out:

"But this isn't the first time a movie has strained so hard to issue a topical message -- the poor Latino Earthlings who keep trying to sneak onto the space station are even called 'illegals' -- that it lost track of basic storytelling imperatives."

So there's no way it could include a "topical message" about the "poor Latino Earthlings," and still deliver a story?  Too tall an order?  What those "imperatives" of Smith's are he never quite does explain, but I'm sure he should get on the phone to Hollywood post haste, since he clearly has the rule book all worked out somewhere.

So there's a sampling of the professional response to a deeply meaningful film about class inequality and extreme poverty, the inherent unfairness of today's very real global system.  Of course the film isn't perfect, and tastes really do vary -- I know that more than anyone --  but there are larger agendas at work here.  The people who hold these positions of cultural criticism really, really want to keep them.  That means they are part of the club.  That's how they are trained, and that's why they are hired.  Chomsky and Herman elaborated on this in Manufacturing Consent .

So, what are my honest, unpaid, unsponsored views on Elysium's weaknesses?  I do have a few.

I'm not sure how much pressure a man like Blomkamp is under working in the studio system with more than $100m of their money to gamble with.  The pressures to alter and to rely on old formulas are likely enormous.  That's how visual and audible cliches end up in the film, the same types of things we've seen before.

- Advertisement -

The music swells and punches up, as is the standard operating procedure.  This was a noticeable weakness, without a lot of thought behind it.  The soundtrack could have used a rethinking, another opinion, some more variety and less beating you over the head at a bare minimum.

Jodie Foster is very good, but she may not have pulled off whatever accent she seems to have been going for.  This didn't bother me all that much, but others commented on the dubbing not being completely in sync during several scenes.

District 9 also resolved with a massive battle between the protagonist and antagonist.  There was a do-over quality here -- with Vickus, Sharlto Copley, unexpectedly flipped around to be the baddie.  Apparently he's been working out.  Blomkamp resorts to a big mano a mano bludgeoning Damon vs. Copley, to finish the film, which could have been more ingenious, something new, something worthy of the rest of the film.  The villain could have done himself in, perhaps, but we can all play armchair quarterbacks on how to climax a massive studio action picture.  Sometimes straight violence is what works.  What felt weak is that Copley may have been a tool of the real antagonist, a hired gun, but by film's climax he's no longer on the payroll.  He's not a part of the system then.  His vengeance against Damon isn't really in defense of the class system of oppression, but more of a personal vendetta.  That is a weakness that didn't quite resolve satisfactorily.  He was simply another obstacle by that point, and no longer represented the system that was the true enemy of most of humanity.  This subtle distinction weakened the story, and it should have been re-examined.

The following scene does, however, get the story back on track.  Damon's sacrifice to change the world and the entire solar system is a direct act against the status quo, a revolution, a defiance, a resetting of the rules.  One man with nothing to lose is a powerful force, the kind that sends shivers down the backs of tyrants.  What shakiness rattled the story is swiftly forgotten as the real stakes and the real meaning of Elysium are brought full circle.

YouTube Video

Joe Giambrone publishes Political Film Blog and other nasty bits of bluster.

- Advertisement -

Next Page  1  |  2

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Google Content Matches:
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Is This the Man Who "Radicalized" Dzhokhar Tsarnaev?

The U.N. Would Never Lie to George Monbiot

The Future Children of Fukushima

Genocide and the Native American Experience

Nuclear Nightmare Worsens

Do I trust Christopher Nolan or his Batman?


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

amazing, what growing being a neighbor of Howard Z... by Rob Kall on Saturday, Aug 10, 2013 at 12:45:11 PM
When I was researching the movie I ran into that j... by Christopher Mandel on Wednesday, Aug 14, 2013 at 4:31:07 PM