To calculate a nation's total rents, we must first establish the amount people pay as "taxes".
- In the US in 2013, tax revenue was $5.3tn (GDP: $16.2tn). Using the ATCOR formula, we conclude that, if America was a tax-free zone, this revenue would revert back to rent.
About one-third of US income is converted from rent into "wages" and "profits" through anti-democratic political and bureaucratic channels .
But if revenue collected by government is ultimately out of rent, why argue for the need to collect that revenue directly? One answer: this would raise the productive capacity of the population. Why? Because taxes inflict "deadweight losses" on society.
If rent revenue is collected in a direct way, productivity is raised by a significant margin.
Rents in Private Pockets
The next question is about the proportion of a nation's revenue that is visible as rent. This is rent that is not collected by government. Economists have no idea of how much rent is circulating in the modern economy.
For current practical purposes, the prudent estimate is that rents in private pockets amount to about 20% of national income.- In the UK, researchers found that rent was 22% of national income in 1985, rising to 29% in 1989. But 1989 was a peak year in the property cycle, just before the recession of 1992. Allowing for the distortions caused by land speculation, the "normal" year estimate for the UK would be for 1987: 21.8%.
- In Australia, researchers -- armed with one of the best official data sets in the world -- calculated that rent in private hands in 2012 was 26% of GDP. Rents in that year were inflated by abnormally high urban and commodity prices (one of the ripple effects of trade with China).
Adding up the "Rents"
If we take a random selection of 10 rich nations, ranging from Australia through the US to Sweden, Germany and Japan, the average tax-take as a percent of GDP is 37%. In ATCOR terms, most of this is rent in its disguised form (collected as if they were "wages" and "profits"). If we add to this the rent that is not collected by government, of around 20%, we find that rent exceeds 50% of national income. This first approximation of rent needs to be adjusted for several reasons.
1. Taxes distort total income. They encourage the
- Under-use of urban land (which artificially raises rents). and they
- motivate behavior that damages the environment, as when polluters do not have to pay for dumping waste into the atmosphere (which artificially reduces rents).
2. A small part of tax revenue may actually fall on wage earners, rather than being shifted (ultimately) onto rent. People with no bargaining power are particularly vulnerable.
Such considerations add to, and subtract from, rent. Further assessment is required, but the outcome would not significantly modify the conservative estimate that rent is about 50% of total income. This is more than sufficient to cover existing government financial commitments.