Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...)  (less...)
Add to My Group
November 12, 2008 at 12:29:57

View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H2) on 11/12/08:

Radio Treason: Hannity Continues Radical Anti-Obama Fearmongering

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By Gustav Wynn (about the author)     Page 2 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

Are not call-in talk shows better for their controversy and difference of opinion? Not on The Sean Hannity Show, where the guests are predominantly on the same page as the host, the make-up of aired calls doesn't approach real-world diversity, and the news items cited exclude altogether events like the filing of Articles of Impeachment in Congress against the President and Vice President, the removal of Alberto Gonzales as Attorney General, or the polls showing national disapproval of continuing the Iraq War.

Instead, Sean's discussion focuses on the evil intentions of liberals to create cradle-to-grave government dependency and the bias of of the left-wing "Obama-mania media". Hannity bemoans what he says is tilted reporting, but at the same time feels there should be no regulation to encourage fairness, that America is supposed to be a see-saw of deception and distortion. Facing the reality that he seems to be fighting against the majority sentiment of his country, Hannity searches for scapegoats and enemies to blame, seeking to cram-fit cherrypicked facts and news of the day into his existing neocon precepts.

For instance, Hannity has been defending General Motors, a long-time sponsor. The company is truly in dire straits with sales plunging alongside the economy and available credit. But GM management refuses to make more fuel-efficient cars in order to compete. Hannity, an unabashed Escalade driver, fails to cite stats that show fuel efficiency and profitability have dovetailed for market leading automakers. Hannity continues to assert that GM makes the best cars in the world and is failing because of crushing external government regulation, leaving out the important counter-argument that Toyota and Honda adhere to the same domestic regulations in assembling 85% of their fleets here in the U.S.

Hannity is a major cheerleader for domestic drilling, claiming the short-term relief of our energy problem lie in immediate exploration and extraction of offshore oil, but lies by omission in not telling you the major commercial and environmental studies see no significant relief in domestic drilling unless the U.S. first reduces its oil-guzzling ways.



During the closing weeks of the election, Hannity implied many times that the crash of the financial markets resulted from Obama's work as a Chicago community organizer who helped steer unqualified minorities into Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac-held mortgages. He also magnified the role of an Obama advisor with ties to the firms, but neglected the even more damning news item that McCain's chief strategist, Campaign Director Rick Davis was on Fannie/Freddie's payroll during most of the election.

In short, Hannity's greatest ethical failure is intellectual cowardice. Instead of debating today's most pressing issues against the most qualified opponents, he censors them, refusing to show how his logic and theories fare in the face of all relevant facts and the "rest of the story". This in turn, makes us question his faith in his own arguments.

The biggest, most glaring example of this is the collapse of every major financial institution on Wall Street just in the last few months. Hannity has theorized for years that free market deregulation is key to prosperity in America, cutting taxes and reducing government spending, monitoring and interference to allow businesses to grow, innovate and create jobs. This is exactly what the Bush administration enacted, relaxing rules for reporting or verifying the viability of speculative financial instruments.

The result? Bear Stearns, Lehman Bros., Merrill Lynch, AIG and others oversold credit default swap policies for trillions more then could be covered. The risky sub-prime mortgages, hidden within much larger mortgage-backed securities triggered mammoth implosion of the unregulated CDS markets and when called, busted the firms for trillions. This is a clear-cut case in which government deregulation led to an urgent and widespread economic crisis which will now affect all Americans and perhaps everyone in the civilized world. 

Hannity continues unrepentant however, claiming that Reagan's trickle-down economics are still what we need. This is after the middle class has given Bush's rich-skewed tax cuts every chance to work, but as a result has seen their quality of life go downhill. This is after Bush allowed rampant government spending with ballooning annual and federal deficits. This is after the preventable collapse of Wall Street. This is after the majority of Americans chose Obama's economic proposals to spread the tax cuts more widely across the middle-class.

Hannity was called out on Veteran's Day by a listener named Lisa from Georgia who tried to explain to him that the people had spoken and his negativity is palpable. Hannity simply couldn't relate to the woman because he has made $100 million by sticking to his script, putting him in the top one-tenth of 1% of taxpayers who would continue to save hundreds of thousands per year under Bush's tax cuts.

This is why Hannity is fighting hard to continue Bush's economic and military policies - he has such a large personal financial stake in trickle-down and receives such acclaim and rewards from military-industrial profiteers, he has become an opponent of the average American taxpayers who have clearly exercised their rights and voted for a change.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

rock-prog.org

(OpEdNews Editor) GW is a proud New Yorker, concerned about media manipulation and overconsumption. He believes in fiscal responsibility, small government and strict ethics. He recently changed careers to become an inner city schoolteacher. A firm (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Book Recommendations for "Economy US Ethics"
Business and Society: Ethics, Government and the World Economy
by Alfred A. Marcus

$45.00

Number of pages: 704
Publisher: McGraw-Hill Inc.,US

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
34 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

This is a JOKE, right? by steve scheetz on Wednesday, Nov 12, 2008 at 4:02:26 PM
No Joke, this is the #1 radio show in the country by Gustav Wynn on Wednesday, Nov 12, 2008 at 4:17:39 PM
All I am saying is simply this by steve scheetz on Wednesday, Nov 12, 2008 at 4:30:09 PM
I happen to agree with Gustav on this. by Nick van Nes on Wednesday, Nov 12, 2008 at 7:32:05 PM
In this, he's telling you the truth by Dana Pico on Wednesday, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:37:33 PM
True by Gallaher on Wednesday, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:11:44 PM
Not the full truth... by Gustav Wynn on Wednesday, Nov 12, 2008 at 11:16:27 PM
Oh, please! by Dana Pico on Thursday, Nov 13, 2008 at 5:46:37 AM
Showbiz by Jennifer Hathaway on Wednesday, Nov 12, 2008 at 4:28:08 PM
Jennifer, you nailed it. by Richmond Shreve on Wednesday, Nov 12, 2008 at 4:42:07 PM
Freedom Of Speech by melpol on Wednesday, Nov 12, 2008 at 4:50:28 PM
Hannity should be locked up... by Daniel Geery on Wednesday, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:06:39 PM
Locked up? by Dana Pico on Wednesday, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:31:13 PM
There are limits to freedom of speech... by Daniel Geery on Thursday, Nov 13, 2008 at 7:55:14 AM
if he did... by steve scheetz on Thursday, Nov 13, 2008 at 11:31:34 AM
So, Mr Geery, why shouldn't we limit YOUR speech? by Dana Pico on Thursday, Nov 13, 2008 at 1:29:50 PM
Hannity's purpose is to serve by richard on Wednesday, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:22:47 PM
Guess you haven't heard about by fou on Wednesday, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:27:20 PM
Did you follow your own advice? by Dana Pico on Wednesday, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:28:51 PM
Hannity is just another moronic rightwing gasbag by chariotdrvr14 on Wednesday, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:45:53 PM
But seriously, folks by Scott on Wednesday, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:52:33 PM
I don't know who KGO's talk show host was . . . by Dana Pico on Thursday, Nov 13, 2008 at 5:50:45 AM
THE QUESTION IS by WML on Thursday, Nov 13, 2008 at 5:29:00 AM
The left has long wanted . . . by Dana Pico on Thursday, Nov 13, 2008 at 6:01:18 AM
NO by WML on Thursday, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:55:58 PM
Your false assumption by Dana Pico on Thursday, Nov 13, 2008 at 1:40:24 PM
THUS by WML on Thursday, Nov 13, 2008 at 9:01:06 PM
Um, by fou on Thursday, Nov 13, 2008 at 1:48:12 PM
Thank you! by Oh on Friday, Nov 14, 2008 at 9:24:29 AM
Hear, Hear! by Han on Thursday, Nov 13, 2008 at 5:30:23 AM
Why is Hannity important by virginius "gin" arnold on Thursday, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:57:24 AM
It doesn't matter by Dana Pico on Friday, Nov 14, 2008 at 5:40:27 AM
THE FREE EXCHANGE OF IDEAS by WML on Friday, Nov 14, 2008 at 12:17:55 PM
Regulating content is not the free exchange of ideas by Dana Pico on Sunday, Nov 16, 2008 at 6:24:04 PM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum