Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 13 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 8 (21 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   2 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Pennsylvania: broke, unless you count the $91 billion

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 2 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 5   Well Said 5   News 3  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H4 5/29/12

Become a Fan
  (7 fans)
- Advertisement -

As the NY Times reported, the $26.3 billion Pennsylvania State Employees' Retirement System (PSERS) has more than 46 percent of its assets in what analysts describe as "riskier" alternatives, including  hundreds of private equity, venture capital and real estate funds. PSERS paid about $1.35 billion in management fees in the last five years and reported a five-year annualized return of 3.6 percent.

"That is below the target needed to meet its financing requirements, and it also lags behind a 4.9 percent median return among public pension systems.

"By contrast, Georgia's $14.4 billion municipal retirement system, which is prohibited by state law from investing in the alternative investments favored in Pennsylvania, has earned 5.3 percent annually over the same time frame and paid about $54 million total in fees."

Even adjusting for the size of the respective funds, Pennsylvania retirees paid out thirteen times more in fees than Georgia, for a worse result.

The conservatively managed BND produced a 17 percent return on equity last year, while the PSRS reported in a press release that it had "achieved" a 2.7 percent return for 2011 -- not even meeting the previous and anemic 3.6 percent average return.

That's like boasting about a C- report card.

- Advertisement -

A far more prudent and productive policy would be to rein in risk taking fund managers, reduce their gigantic fees and shift at least twenty percent of investments from their riskier deals into the lower risk, higher return equity of a public bank.

A closer look at Pennsylvania's 2011 CAFR turns up another interesting item. At page 99, there is a discussion of how these off-budget funds manage the risk of investments in thirty-six foreign currencies.

Foreign currencies?  Thirty-six? The high rolling fund managers are shifting billions of dollars out of the Pennsylvania economy, and into foreign economies and job creation, while Pennsylvanians go begging.

Even a modestly capitalized public bank can put billions of dollars of affordable credit to work in Pennsylvania, generate substantial non-tax revenue as a direct return on investment and increase local and state tax revenue in an improving economy.

A public bank has the capacity to turn a tidal wave of economic devastation into a wave of opportunity and prosperity. Pennsylvania needs to catch that wave.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

http://www.publicbankingpa.org

Author of the forthcoming novel "Pursuits of Happiness," a director of the Public Banking Institute and chairman of the Pennsylvania Project. Mike is an international transportation and logisics executive with broad experience in U.S. government (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The crash of 2016: Wall Street gets ready

Pennsylvania: broke, unless you count the $91 billion

Lou Dobbs: Overpopulation threatens all that makes America great

Public Banks: helping workers by helping people

Sleepwalking to Armageddon?

The Money Monopoly

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Krauss nails it. Austerity and deficits are creati... by R A Bows on Wednesday, May 30, 2012 at 12:11:18 AM
Thanks Mike for exposing the truth about the CAFRs... by Scott Baker on Wednesday, May 30, 2012 at 4:29:10 AM