Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats

Paxil Study 329 All Over Again?

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan   -- Page 2 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

  • Is your son 2D6 deficient?
  • Does your son have predominant Axis I disorder other than MDD (e.g. dysthymic disorder, eating disorders, Specific phobia, PTSD, OCD, Panic disorder, etc?
  • Has your son ever had any history of a psychotic episode or psychotic disorder (including schizophrenia ), or complication of these diseases?
  • Does your son have a history of a bipolar disorder, or complication of these diseases?
  • Does he have Attention-Deficit, or Hyperactivity Disorder?
  • Does he have Mental Retardation or Pervasive Development Disorder?
  • Has your son ever taken any drugs that have led to Substance Abuse or Dependence?
  • Has he ever been treated with Paxil before?
  • Has he, in the past 12 weeks been treated with electroconvulsive therapy?
  • Does he have a past history of serotonin syndrome and neuroleptic malignant syndrome?
  • Does he have a CDRS-R score of "suicidal ideation" of 3 or greater. Or did his C-SSRS assessment suggest that they he has been a significant risk for harming himself or has actually harmed himself?
  • Does he have a past history of suicide attempt, self harm(excluding "no suicidal intent " ), or an intentional overdose (excluding obviously unintentional overdose)?
  • Does he have glaucoma?
  • Does he have convulsive disorders such as epilepsy or past history of these diseases?
  • Is he using drugs (e.g. NSAIDs) that would increase the risk of hemorrhage, or has he had bleeding tendency or hemorrhagic diathesis?
  • Does he have severe renal and hepatic disorder?
  • Does he have a serious organic disorder in the brain?
  • Does he have chronic hepatitis type B and/or C which is positive of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and/or hepatitis C antibody?
  • Does he have a current history of carcinoma or malignant tumor, or complication of these diseases?
  • Does he have clinical significant co morbid impulsivity symptoms.(e.g. Personality Disorder, Conduct Disorder)?
  • Finally, one question the doctor WILL NOT be able to ask this mother would be
  • Has he, in the opinion of a 'specialist', been judged as not appropriate for Paxil?

A huge list of questions for any doctor but ones that should be asked if Paxil is granted a license for use in children in Japan. If it's good enough for GlaxoSmithKline to exclude subjects from the trial because they don't meet the criteria then it's fair to say that doctors should be concerned and ask the patient or the patient's parents the above questions.

Two questions I have put to GlaxoSmithKline in an email are thus:

1- What exactly does the exclusion criterion "Patients in the opinion of the chief investigator (subinvestigator) judged as not eligible for the study" mean? What other criteria might this include not already listed. Could it possibly mean that children & adolescents will be pre-screened, by genetic testing to be sure that they are not deficient in the CYP450-2D6 enzyme that Paxil desperately needs to be safely cleared from a persons system. Will these kids not be included in the study?

2- Does the long list of exclusion criteria really represent the real world of kids that will be prescribed this drug in Japan, if it is approved. Will doctors use this same list of criteria when deciding to prescribe Paxil to their young Japanese patients?

----

You have to ask yourselves if GlaxoSmithKline used the same criteria in other trials for Paxil other than trials for children. Whatever or whomever they excluded in all of the Paxil trials should be made abundantly clear to all.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) - The FDA's equivalent in the UK - need a thorough impartial investigation. Their own Chief Executive refuses to budge on his stance that Seroxat (Paxil) is safe.

See (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments