Share on Google Plus 1 Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   1 comment

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Party Opposition is Not Civil War

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 2 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Become a Fan
  (6 fans)

Today many individuals conceptualize and thereby practice the politics of fracture.   They either explicitly or implicitly use the rhetoric of destruction and annihilation:   whether reflected in efforts to "secede" from the union or merely suggesting a "gun-sight" be placed on a website over a particular opposing candidate's photo.

Roles have altered over time.   But in our day, arguably, it would be fair to describe the Republican party as the party seeking to uphold the ideal of freedom.   And the Democratic party as the party seeking to uphold the ideal of unity or community.

There are two different ways to view party roles.   One way is the way of fracture and annihilation:   that freedom is the only way and that community is socialism and wrong and must be destroyed at all costs or the result is the apocalypse, and vice versa.  

The other method is the way of balancing or complementarity.   This view recognizes that each party has a purpose.   It recognizes that the purpose of each party rests in advancing its particular ideal:   freedom or unity.   It recognizes that freedom and unity are pairs of opposites that need each other in order to create meaning--that there can be no conception of freedom without a conception of community.   This view maintains that practices of fracture and annihilation destroy our whole society, not just the intended hated other.  

Complementarity understands that it is extremely difficult to try and hold as your goal both ideals at the same time.   One must have priority over the other.   But complemetarity also understands that this "prioritization" is not evil.   In fact, it is necessary.   And, this is the very role of political parties, to hold sacred and advance the core ideal of its group.   However, complementarity understands that in any given epoch -- sometimes freedom must lead, but sometimes unity must lead also.   It understands that this is why we have elections: to decide which priority should lead given the needs of the time.

Put an End to Civil War Thinking

We must put an end to Civil War thinking.

There are multiple valid purposes, all inspired by a given ideal.   Men and women; Parent and Child, white and black, Republican and Democrat, the list goes on and on.     

In our lives we can treat these differences as contradictions and reasons to try and annihilate one another, or we can see them as the complements they are in reality.   If we accept reality, we accept a dynamic life that demands and requires balancing.   We understand that this is the thrill of living. For the work is never done.   We adjust our purpose in the great symphony of life and thereby advance all other forms of purpose.   This can only happen if we accept the importance and purpose of the other and not seek their annihilation.   When every person is important and has significance, the result is peace: a dynamic peace in living.   Annihilation will achieve peace also. But it will be the static peace of death.   Choose life.

Next Page  1  |  2

Eric Z. Lucas is an alumnus of Stanford University (Creative Writing Major: 1972-1975), the University of Washington (1981: BA English Literature and Elementary Education) and Harvard Law School, J.D. 1986. Since law school he has been a public (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Redefining Citizenship Can End the War on Drugs

Incognito versus Wooden: The Mythology of Ruthlessness

Create the Compassionate Society

Richard Sherman:"...A Little Further Than Football"

True Service

A Culture of Work: A Social Justice Response


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

The technique of fracture has been used before in ... by Eric Lucas on Sunday, Nov 18, 2012 at 1:41:40 PM