Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
10 comments, In Series: Election fraud

OpEdNews Op Eds

Part II - Rigged Elections for Romney?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 2 of 5 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 3   News 3   Valuable 3  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H2 10/31/12
Become a Fan
  (103 fans)

opednews.com

In addition the intermediate data between the precinct machines and the central tabulators is stored in a proprietary obfuscated binary format unavailable to even the county registrar of voters.  That represents a loss of the "electronic chain of custody" of the votes.

Their evidence from Francois et al. is straightforward and powerful.

The researchers asked two questions:  Did a county vote distribution violate the laws of probability in terms of increased vote totals for one or more candidates based on precinct size (an amazing anomaly)?  And was the county using a central tabulator or not?  The answer the second question moves us in the direction of isolating a locus for the process.

Fortunately, Wisconsin has a number of counties that do not use central tabulators.  One of those counties, Outagamie, is the sixth largest county in the state.

Tabulator versus No-Tabulator Counties in Wisconsin - Milwaukee Compared to Outagamie

The entire state of Wisconsin displayed the amazing anomaly of Romney gains as precinct size increased.  Central tabulator counties make up the vast majority of votes and voting precincts in the state.  This graph below, from Part I, displays that phenomenon. It is worth reviewing briefly.  The slope of Romney's line is an amazing anomaly. As you can see with the red oval, the anomaly produces a trend that leads to victory for Romney.  Without the amazing anomaly, Romney would have lost Wisconsin by 53,991 votes: Romney 34.29%, Santorum 41.14%.

 

The graphs below show candidate vote accumulations from the smallest to largest precincts in the county. The graphic representation of the vote accumulation in Outagamie (left) is well within the realm of statistical probability. The graph of Milwaukee County, below right, shows the amazing anomaly for Romney, as seen above, for the entire state. These two graphs represent the same election, same day, same state.

(Note:  An outside volunteer independently downloaded the data from Wisconsin's counties and came up with the exact same results.  (Click for larger images)
(Click here for Excel of Wisconsin by precinct with amazing anomaly calculations)

In Outagamie County, WI Santorum won with 10,673 votes to Romney's 9,750.  Romney won Milwaukee County 48,424 to Santorum's 28,491. Several other no-tabulator counties in Wisconsin fail to show an amazing anomaly increase for any candidate from smallest to largest precincts.

Milwaukee County, on the other hand, used ES&S electronic voting machines and an ES&S Unity Server central tabulator as part of the county elections division.  In Milwaukee County Romney's vote totals and percentage for precincts increased at a highly improbable rate from the largest to the smallest precincts.

In non-central-tabulator counties, precinct workers report the election data to county elections officials, who then enter the data on an Excel spreadsheet and display directly on their county website. They also transmit that data to the state elections officials. As a result, there is no opportunity for private parties to manipulate the vote count in a central tabulator.

Voting in Outagamie County is done on a mix of paper ballots and optical scan voting machines, which have a real paper trail, the optical scan forms that voters fill out.  There is no observable amazing anomaly occurring in precincts using either paper ballots (with some optical scan machines) or optical scan machines only. (See pdf from volunteer for all Wisconsin counties by paper ballot versus voting machine results for the amazing anomaly.)

Iowa and New Hampshire

The Iowa caucuses and the New Hampshire primary also display the amazing anomaly.  Each showed signs of suspected vote flipping.

The Iowa Caucuses are run by the Republican Party.  After meeting in precinct areas for debate, Iowa Republicans cast their ballots for candidates on paper ballots.  These are counted at the caucus site and transmitted to the Republican Party, which then tabulates the vote.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5

 

http://www.opednews.com/author/author3863.html

Researcher, writer DC Area Attack on Syria - Struggle for Turkey - Attack on Libya - The Money Party = Survival - End Times - Obama Administration - Politics and Policy - Election fraud - Pennsylvania Sexual Abuse Scandal - (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Worst President Ever - Barack H. Obama

It's official! You're on your own

Ukraine President Once Agent for U.S. State Department

Rigged Elections for Romney?

Real Unemployment at 23% - Dampening the Excitement

The Pennsylvania Sexual Assault Scandal, the Second Mile Foundation, and Penn State

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
7 people are discussing this page, with 10 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Its seems the height of insanity that electronic v... by Poor old Dirt farmer on Thursday, Nov 1, 2012 at 9:39:33 AM
This should get a response from the tech crowd:cli... by Francois Choquette on Thursday, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:06:00 PM
It is my understanding from a MoveOn.org article t... by Lynn Maldonado on Thursday, Nov 1, 2012 at 6:15:56 PM
Part II of Rigged Elections for Romney expands on ... by Michael Collins on Friday, Nov 2, 2012 at 1:32:29 AM
precinct level in the big races with occasional ha... by Mark Adams JD/MBA on Friday, Nov 2, 2012 at 11:24:14 AM
This is real! I'm looking at an amazing, "come fro... by Dante DeNavarre on Friday, Nov 2, 2012 at 6:32:55 PM
Ex NSA agent discusses the various way the Pima co... by Francois Choquette on Saturday, Nov 3, 2012 at 12:05:05 AM
Elections Specialist Jim March Testifies About Bla... by Francois Choquette on Saturday, Nov 3, 2012 at 12:06:50 AM
... by Scott L on Sunday, Nov 4, 2012 at 12:16:37 PM
Hi Scott,We have some Mass data. Write me at: fran... by Francois Choquette on Sunday, Nov 4, 2012 at 5:17:41 PM