Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
10 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Our Political System Threatens Humanity

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 2 of 4 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 3   Well Said 1   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H3 3/1/09

opednews.com

Mr. President, you have advocated transparency in our government. We need a political system that operates in plain view of the American people, one that provides a level playing field where all ideas can compete openly and fairly.

In short, we need a political system that enforces intellectual honesty, instead of one that rewards deceit by providing a plethora of policies and procedures that can be easily exploited to evade careful scrutiny and open debate.

Money and intellectual dishonesty

The driving force of our political system is money and intellectual dishonesty. Like the chicken and the egg, money and intellectual dishonesty create each other. Like the chicken and the egg, both are manifestations of the same process. Money provides the incentive and intellectual dishonesty provides the means (in the form of built-in, dishonest policies and procedures), which then provides more money, and so on.

Mr. President, there wouldn’t be thousands of highly paid special interest lobbyists if our political system didn’t provide the means to their ends. Our political system is essentially entrenched intellectual dishonesty. Here are just a few examples:

-----So-called logrolling (where politicians trade favors) allows unjust special interest legislation to flourish, “If you vote for my wasteful earmark, I’ll vote for yours”.

-----Punishing politicians who resist coercion and put conscience above party loyalty.

-----Forcing a yes or no vote on bills containing unjust special interest amendments attached to worthwhile legislation.

-----The especially egregious standing committee system that provides powerful means to push unjust special interest legislation and to thwart worthwhile legislation.

An intellectually honest political system would encourage politicians to always put conscience above party loyalty; it would require all provisions of a bill and all markups (amendments) to be related to a single issue; it would make it easier to bypass committee chairs or to circumvent the semi-autonomous standing committee system altogether when a committee withholds bills from open debate and majority decision.

Considering our blatantly dishonest political system, why should anyone be surprised by the rampant waste in our government, or by the disastrous wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, or by the current financial and economic meltdown, or by the perpetual violence in the Middle East? A blatantly dishonest political system is bound to produce blatantly disastrous results.

Mr. President, you are well aware that our political system’s entrenched mechanisms are regularly exploited by skilled politicians to evade rational argument and open debate. By tolerating these evasive tactics, our political system often passes bad legislation, often prevents good legislation and effectively precludes any real reform. Why should anyone expect any real change until we radically reform our intellectually dishonest political system?

If these dishonest mechanisms were replaced with rational policies and procedures that enforce intellectual honesty, it would be much more difficult to pass unjust special-interest legislation and to prevent reform. An intellectually honest political system would require opposing positions to openly compete using rational argument and open debate and would provide a fair, level playing field to accomplish this.

An intellectually honest political system would no longer be a magnet for nefarious special-interest money. Thousands of lobbyists pushing unjust special-interest legislation would have much less incentive to offer mounds of money to politicians who no longer had easy means to evade the truth. The chicken and egg cycle of money and intellectual dishonesty would be broken.

Under a political system that enforces intellectual honesty, truth would trump political expediency. Reason would rule. Evasion would not be tolerated. Politicians who try to evade rational argument and open debate would no longer be taken seriously by the American people. Our political system would take a giant step toward fairness and sanity.

Intellectual dishonesty produces an insane political system

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Our Political System Threatens Humanity

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

Carmen Yarrusso, a software engineer for 35 years, designed and modified computer operating systems (including Internet software). He has a BS in physics and studied game theory and formal logic during his years with the math department at (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Wikiarguments: A practical plan to get big money out of politics

Why single-payer is the ONLY sensible health care reform (explained in plain English)

A Manifesto for the Impending Second American Revolution

Why a peaceful, people's revolution is the only way to take back our government

Top Ten Reasons to Legalize Marijuana Now

WikiArguments: a Simple, Efficient, and Effective Way to Completely Eliminate Deceit in Congress

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
7 people are discussing this page, with 10 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

The "Right/Left" republican vs democrat ... by Michael McCoy on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:39:34 AM
The "Right/Left" republican vs democrat ... by Michael McCoy on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:45:50 AM
by one or another "special interest group&quo... by Starla Immak on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 9:26:28 AM
No question about it. But one alternative was writ... by Roopa Placid on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 9:27:07 AM
And you're obviously asking the wrong man to c... by Mr M on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 10:14:40 AM
MR M I agree , read this article,, and next comes ... by MARGARET BASET on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 2:11:31 PM
The US was established as a republic. Those who ex... by William Whitten on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 6:47:07 PM
The assessment given by the author, Ms. Yarrusso, ... by William Whitten on Tuesday, Mar 3, 2009 at 12:29:17 AM
LETS GO BACK IN TIME AT THE LAST DEM PRESIDENT HOR... by MARGARET BASET on Tuesday, Mar 3, 2009 at 3:07:58 AM
A deligently compiled article, which is relevant t... by Vijayaraghavan Padmanabhan on Tuesday, Mar 3, 2009 at 11:12:09 AM