Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (1 comment)

On Liberalism, American Conservatism and Reactionary neo-Conservatism: exploiting ambiguous nomenclature

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan   -- Page 2 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

So, today in 2008, you have tens of millions of deceived and unsophisticated Americans who are liberals and don’t know it, and who are decrying liberalism and chanting for a society free of liberalism. They themselves are liberal just for believing, unlike the Neocons, in freedom, equality and democracy. They have no grasp of the fact that the liberal-free state that they champion resembles Gitmo or the Tower of London, where freedom and rights are nonexistent. And they cannot at this time be made to see otherwise by any means known to me. They are programmed to distrust us self-avowed liberals however cogent our arguments, and I’m afraid that the corporatists have already succeeded in their quest to capture our government. They could drop the charade tomorrow and just declare martial law, which would also be acceptable to the deceived for a time. But a brutal and oppressive regime a la the Nazis would finally lead to resistance even from the ditto head contingent. None of that is necessary. A gradual transformation and consolidation of the remainder of our government functions and economy can be effected stealthily allowing these plutocratic corporatists to go about their business with a minimum of resistance, police or prisons.

Just as a final thought, self-described conservative Americans, also known as the classical, laissez-faire liberals are just beginning to realize that there is something very wrong with the Republican Party. Like we liberals who have mostly disavowed the Democratic Party, they are beginning to distance themselves from the Republicans. This was manifest as an unusually robust Ron Paul candidacy, the man who for many on the right served the same charismatic, even messianic role for conservatives that the Obama candidacy has thus far provided for the left. As a result, the classical liberals, formerly self-described Republicans, are beginning to call themselves Libertarians in order to distinguish and distance themselves from the Bush type of politicians and operatives, a change which will further muddy the waters of political nomenclature.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

The author is a fifty-something year old physician soon to be expatriated.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

....exploiting ambiguous nomenclature by im4unity on Monday, Jul 28, 2008 at 4:01:58 PM