Tag(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 7/2/08:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (16 comments)

Olbermann Spins His FISA-Flip in True Rovian Fashion

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)
Page 2 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

Then Olbermann sums it up this way...

"Explain that you are standing aside on civil immunity, not just for political expediency, but for a greater and more tangible good, the holding to account, of the most-corrupt, the most dangerous, and the most anti-democracy presidential administration in our long history."
The civil cases are being fought tooth and nail in court, not because of money, but because the system is demanding to see the evidence; they have to know exactly who was spied on, when they were spied on, and what information was gathered in the process in order to move forward with the trials.

That is why this is out in the public costing the telecoms millions of dollars in PR and legal fees and greasing the palms of politicians. If they could have settled for money, don't you think they would have done it long ago? It's about knowing what this illegal program was all about. That is why it is so important.

And Olbermann knows that.

After this legislation passes, there is no way to "hold this administration accountable" on this issue. And Olbermann is not so stupid that he doesn't know that as well.

In the end, this is what happens when you defend an indefensible position; you lose credibility. You start to sound like Bill O on Fox News.

I can't wait to read Glenn Greenwald's response to this.

In the end, what is most important here, is not giving away pieces of the constitution for the "promise" of change. That is a gamble, and one I might add, that I feel I have shown, is not worth the risk because there is no way to win it. But even if there was a way, retroactive immunity for illegally spying on American citizens is too high a price to pay for any elected office. Rigged elections or not.

No, Keith, you are dead wrong on this and you should have just left it alone. Greenwald was absolutely right in his first article about your revised position on the FISA bill and you have shown a desperation here today with this "special comment" that looks more like Rovian Spin than it does channeling Edward R. Murrow.

Your stock just fell again, Keith. Bad call.

Editors's note:

I'll be interviewing John Dean on my radio show tonight and we'll be talking about FISA. Rob Kall Radio Show: John Dean, Paul Craig Roberts, with Ray McGovern Co-hosting

Next Page  1  |  2

 

http://willyloman.wordpress.com/

Attended J.M.U. and V.C.U. in the '80s and '90's. Worked as a builder and installer of film, stage, and theme park sets and attractions. Currently works as a designer and draftsman for residential and commercial projects. Wrote "Prescription for a (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Editor

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
16 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Greenwald did write a response to Olbermann's Comment... by scott creighton on Wednesday, Jul 2, 2008 at 10:03:33 AM
It'll be criminal prosecution, not civil by Raymond McInnis on Wednesday, Jul 2, 2008 at 10:35:10 AM
i would gladly agree... by scott creighton on Wednesday, Jul 2, 2008 at 10:48:36 AM
We need to Take it to a New Level by Jason Paz on Wednesday, Jul 2, 2008 at 11:15:14 AM
I watch Keith every evening by Susan Nelsen on Wednesday, Jul 2, 2008 at 12:28:19 PM
Sorry, the "big words" are so difficult... by scott creighton on Wednesday, Jul 2, 2008 at 12:44:00 PM
The Communications Theory behind Laft-Gatekeeping by Nathaniel Heidenheimer on Wednesday, Jul 2, 2008 at 12:37:32 PM
Yep... by scott creighton on Wednesday, Jul 2, 2008 at 12:55:12 PM
Watergate and Bush a NECESSARY COMPARISON! by Nathaniel Heidenheimer on Wednesday, Jul 2, 2008 at 6:37:53 PM
sad but possibly true by jersey girl on Wednesday, Jul 2, 2008 at 7:22:46 PM
People please ... stop ... by Mr M on Wednesday, Jul 2, 2008 at 10:56:23 PM
Some Eyes Still Wide Open... by scott creighton on Wednesday, Jul 2, 2008 at 11:13:02 PM
Agreed on the OH PLEASE, Mr M by steve scheetz on Wednesday, Jul 2, 2008 at 11:27:33 PM
Keith O and the final betrayal by jersey girl on Thursday, Jul 3, 2008 at 6:09:43 AM
Jay Bird Street by richard on Thursday, Jul 3, 2008 at 7:59:01 AM
Thanks for catching that ... by Mr M on Thursday, Jul 3, 2008 at 8:17:44 AM