Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 3 Share on Facebook 3 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 3 (9 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   2 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Obama's Willing Executioners of the Fourth Amendment

By       Message Norman Solomon     Permalink
      (Page 2 of 2 pages) Become a premium member to see this article as one long page.
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 5   Well Said 4   Valuable 3  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H2 7/25/13

Author 38935
Become a Fan
  (12 fans)
- Advertisement -

Franken is now saying he'll introduce a bill for "transparency" because the public will support the current surveillance programs if they grasp what's really involved: " I think that if there were greater transparency, Americans would have a better understanding of these programs."  Count on transparency to be a buzzword cloak for more of the same.

Another Democratic senator, Ron Wyden, has been vastly more candid. At a forum the day before the Amash amendment vote, Wyden said that for surveillance, as far as the Obama administration is concerned, "the authority is essentially limitless."

An ACLU staff attorney,  Alexander Abdo , was driving at the same point when he wrote days ago: " Perhaps the most fundamental problem with the NSA's constitutional theory is that it has no limit. If the constitution is blind to the collection of our data and limits only the NSA's later uses of it, then the NSA truly can "collect it all' now and ask questions later. Our emails, phone calls and internet activities would all be very simple for the NSA to collect under the NSA's theory. But it could go much further. It could put video cameras on every street corner, it could install microphones in every home and it could even remotely copy the contents of every computer hard drive."

All three branches of the U.S. government are now largely under the control of forces with stunning contempt for basic legal processes required by the Bill of Rights. Mere words and mild reforms from members of Congress may mollify the gullible, but only a direct challenge to the Obama administration's policies can rise to the level of the current historic imperative to restore civil liberties in the United States.

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

Next Page  1  |  2


- Advertisement -

Must Read 5   Well Said 4   Valuable 3  
View Ratings | Rate It

Norman Solomon, national coordinator of the Bernie Delegates Network, is co-founder of the online activist group His books include "War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death." He is the executive director (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Growing Campaign to Revoke Obama's Nobel Peace Prize

Clinton's Transition Team: A Corporate Presidency Foretold

Obama's Speech, Translated into Candor

Obama's Escalating War on Freedom of the Press

Is MoveOn Less Progressive Than the New York Times Editorial Board?

What The Assault On Whistleblowers Has to Do With War on Syria