90 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 34 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Nuclear Experimentation: Year 67.

By       (Page 2 of 2 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   1 comment
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Ethan Indigo Smith
Become a Fan
  (21 fans)

 

 

The question marks are above because not even supposed nuclear scientists know exactly what is occurring in these places.   Over 2,000 experimental nuclear detonations have battered the most amazing place in the solar system, Mother Earth.   Aside from the major nuclear experimentation accidents and detonations which have occurred, which we are aware of, there has been countless leaks and lost materials during the last 67 years of nuclear experimentation mainly in the fields of power generation and martial detonation experimentation.   Some releases were less notable as far as the amount radioactive particles released and some have been kept secret.   Omitting information and keeping secrets is typical for the nuclear experimentation industry, it was incepted in secret and because of its close ties to the global military industrial complex, and because of how insanely dangerous it is, it operates secretively to this day.  

    There are mad scientists among us.   They have opened Pandora's Box.   Nuclear experimentation is mad.   I am not a scientist, nor does one need to be to know enough about the history of nuclear experimentation and human behavior to understand its instability and unsustainability.   Nuclear experimentation is Pandora's Box, we have literally ignited fires that cannot be put out, opened what cannot be closed.   We, the human collective, have released fire which was once only allegory.   And in a world where everything is controlled by the institutions with the biggest sticks, nuclear experimentation being the biggest stick in the universe, provides martial balance in mutual assured destruction.   Not only are we, as a human collective, igniting more fires, we're never going to put the current fires out as long as those with the biggest sticks are allowed to rule over us, as a global collective, threatening mutual assured destruction.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_assured_destruction

      The governments of the world are as mad as MAD.   I don't care what scientists say about the potential efficiency of nuclear experimentation as a power source because I'm an empirical observer.   As a self-proclaimed and unaccredited political scientist it's obvious to me nuclear experimentation scientists cannot be trusted.   It's obvious the experiment began in secret among lies and was originally implemented to kill large numbers of people.   It's obvious to me that nuclear experimentation is instable and unsustainable.   And no matter how learned one is and no matter if one believes in the prophecy of the seventh generation the detriment of nuclear experimentation should be obvious.   If you believe in god or if you consider yourself spiritual or simply identify with Nietzsche one should do all one can to standup against nuclear experimentation as violating earth.   It is death the destroyer of worlds.

http://www.indianlegend.com/mohawk/mohawk_001.htm

    You cannot debate the scientific supporters of nuclear experimentation, you cannot present alternative perspective with them like you can more rational scientists, less influenced by politics, whom appreciate alternative information.   Nuclear scientists are zealots.   Credentialed scientists who support nuclear experimentation in year 67 and beyond are not scientists, in the true sense of the word, they are Pandorans.   A true scientist would consider the reality of nuclear experimentation and come to the conclusion that it is instable and unsustainable and must be discontinued.   The nuclear experimentation conundrum is not scientific.   The nuclear experimentation conundrum is political and even behavioral.  

   Just like medical doctors use science, but are not scientists and just like statistics uses math, but is not math, nuclear experimentation is not scientifically endorsable unless the intention is to kill people.   Nuclear experimentation is not science, it is jingoist war culture, and it is maddening logic; mutual assured destruction.   The nuclear experimentation conundrum provides a window into the four types of political mentality, the four reactions to information.

    As proposed in the Complete Patriot's Guide to Oligarchical Collectivism, there are four basic reactions to information.   There are the zealous, who like mad scientists, ignore all relevant information counter to their opinion and direction.   Then there are the idiots, who would rather not know anything about any serious subject, let alone nuclear experimentation.   Thirdly there are the elitists who know about it and choose to benefit from it and profit off it at the expense of everyone else, and by everyone, I mean everyone alive and potentially everyone who might be alive in the future.   And finally the fourth reaction is that of the patriots.   Patriots question the subject and then act out of concern for locals, land, and liberty and the only inhabitable rock around, Mother Earth.

    I don't care what nuclear scientists say anymore or how factually they illustrate their point or with what certainty they speak.   I don't care because I'm human and deep down I believe that all quality invention and progression begins as intuition and insight, not from institutionalized zealots hyped up on Pandora juice and invention of killing machines.   I don't trust scientists or anyone who supports nuclear experimentation, whether power generation or martial detonations for they are either idiots and just don't know or their zealots who just won't let go or elitists who reap from the status quo.   Anyone with any sense of humanity left in them, with any knowledge of the nuclear experimentation at all, would demand nuclear experimentation be ceased.  

    Scientists are taught to be Pandoran and to practice hubris to the degree, that not only are people going hungry while experiments are taking place, but the experiments could kill us all.   Questioning patriots --people who love locals, land and liberty, not the GOP or the DNC- cannot trust or endorse nuclear experimentation as a legitimate science for they hide the truth and refuse to consider the history and the totality of the situation.   It is almost as if they, the nuclear experimentation industry and the military industrial complex, are holding onto their perspective steadfastly trying to prove that the experiment can work, when it is obvious it cannot, when it obviously it is out of control.   If the nuclear experimentation industry was based on science rather than politics it would be terminated immediately.  

    You are either an ignorant idiot, a mad zealot or a secretive elitist if you support nuclear experimentation.   Supporting nuclear experimentation requires a monkey mind.   One has to resort to a considering it exactly as depicted by the three wise monkeys to support it.   You either make yourself blind to it all, deaf to alternative perspective or secretively benefit from it so as to have nice quarters on a sinking ship.   Be the fourth monkey Do/Fear No Evil and discontinue support of nuclear experimentation.   Further we should all criticize the so called scientists who zealously pick and choose what they consider of the last 67 years of history and support the industry.

 

"Look not at what is contrary to propriety; listen not to what is contrary to propriety; speak not what is contrary to propriety; make no movement which is contrary to propriety." ~Confucius

 

 

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Ethan Indigo Smith Social Media Pages: Facebook Page       Twitter Page       Linked In Page       Instagram Page

Ethan was raised in Maine, Manhattan, and Mendocino, California. Ethan has traveled the world and has been employed as a Private Detective, a dishwasher, a valet, a snowboard instructor and always a poet. Ethan Indigo Smith (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

1984 And The Allegory of the Cave

Nuclear Experimentation Killed Free Power

Is Graffiti Art? Squaw Valley Audi FIS

The Failed Politics and Faulty Science of Climate Change

The Metaphysics of Monotheism

Swine Flu May Be Renamed; How about Fecal Flu?

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend