Tag(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Interesting 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (4 comments)

Nuclear Cold Fusion

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (1 fan)   -- Page 2 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

g) Emission of energetic nuclear particles

Investigations of such effects should be publicly supported. A new kind of nuclear phenomena, if real, can lead to unexpected practical applications. The cost of CMNS research, at this stage, is relatively negligible. Most CMNS experts will no longer be available in a decade or two; the time to act is now! “

3) And here is a comment made by Storms:

“As an active researcher in the field of cold fusion for the last 20 years, I can attest to the reality of the effect, its potential as an ideal source of energy, and the difficulty in understanding how the effect can be made to occur. The large amount of accumulated experience demonstrates that the effect is real and is a source of energy resulting from various nuclear reactions. However, the effect is not yet understood at a level that makes a practical device possible or can convince certain skeptics that the effect is actually real. Nevertheless, the critical need for such a clean and sustainable energy source and the need for economic stimulus based on a new technology  makes a  reexamination of this controversial effect essential, regardless of how unlikely it may seem to a few people.  The time for debate is past. We now need to get to work on new energy sources regardless of how unrealistic they may seem to be.”

4) Fortunately, hardware and technical support, needed to replicate experiments described by CMNS researchers, is available in existing National Laboratories. The total cost of replication of one or two selected experiments can probably be as low one million dollars. That kind of money can be generated with the existing scientific budget. Will such sum be allocated to either validate or refute one or two claims made by highly qualified researchers? This remains to be seen. What we do not need is another Department of Energy panel vote; we need a panel of experts ready to perform experiments, together with still available CMNS experts.

5) What I posted yesterday was extracted from my ICCF14 (14th International Conference on Cold Fusion, Washington D.C., Fall 2008. The entire report is at:


< click here >

Next Page  1  |  2

 

http://csam.montclair.edu/~kowalski/life/intro.htm

Ludwik Kowalski is a retired physics teacher (Professor emeritus, Montclair State University, New Jersey, USA). He is the author of two recently-published FREE books:

1) "Hell on Earth: Brutality and violence under the Stalinist regime" (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Support for this work is long overdue! by Mark Goldes on Sunday, Jan 18, 2009 at 8:30:04 PM
HHO gas is over unity by Patrick on Monday, Jan 19, 2009 at 1:24:33 AM
A correction by Ludwik Kowalski on Monday, Jan 19, 2009 at 7:48:50 AM
What a Concept by James Hadstate on Tuesday, Jan 20, 2009 at 1:39:25 PM