![]() |
By Darol Dickinson, Posted by Linn Cohen-Cole (about the submitter) Page 2 of 2 page(s)
The Fourth Component is Enforcements It can be disastrously expensive. The majority of US livestock producers don’t like the thought of imprisonment and exorbitant fines. NAIS, when mandatory, as proposed by USDA, will require 100% computer movement documentation at the full expense of livestock owners. In a three year period the total NAIS computer movement numbers in the USA will more than eclipse the number of all people living on the entire planet earth. The whopping magnitude of this federal numbering burden will require a giant increase in USDA employees, facilities, and, of course IES will explode with new “clients.” Every livestock producer is encouraged to study the many intricate details of NAIS. The large majority of livestock producers refuse to enroll their premises in NAIS. Oppose NAIS now, rather than when it becomes scurrilously mandatory. There is a small amount of time remaining to politically react. For more information www.naisSTINKS.com or www.NONAIS.org or www.LibertyArk.net. Australian ear tag case:
Http://www.agmates.com/blog/2008/06/30/
Cornell Agriculture Law:
Http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/7/usc_sec_07_00008313----000-.html
APHIS’ Investigative and Enforcement Services
Http://www.aphis.usda.gov/ies
1 | 2
Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Stop NAIS entirely. Demand an investigation of filthy corporate feedlots and slaughter houses, the MEGA merger of JBS Swift, the corruption of the FDA and USDA which still allows known MAD COW material in chicken, fish, pig feed and pet food.
Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Contact Editor |
| 4 comments |
Want to post your own comment on this Article?
|
||||
Tell a Friend:
|
Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews |