Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (3 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   16 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

More Second Amendment Madness

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 2 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Funny 1  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H2 1/14/13

Become a Fan
  (54 fans)
- Advertisement -

In another letter on Nov. 7, 1786, Washington questioned Gen. Lincoln about the unrest: "What is the cause of all these commotions? When and how will they end?" Washington was especially concerned about the possibility of a hidden British hand.

Lincoln responded: "Many of them [the rebels] appear to be absolutely so [mad] if an attempt to annihilate our present constitution and dissolve the present government can be considered as evidence of insanity."

However, the U.S. government -- under the Articles of Confederation -- lacked the means to restore order. So wealthy Bostonians financed their own force under Gen. Lincoln to crush the uprising in February 1787. Afterwards, Washington remained concerned the rebellion might be a sign that European predictions about American chaos were coming true.

"If three years ago [at the end of the American Revolution] any person had told me that at this day, I should see such a formidable rebellion against the laws & constitutions of our own making as now appears I should have thought him a bedlamite -- a fit subject for a mad house," Washington wrote to Knox on Feb. 3, 1787, adding that if the government "shrinks, or is unable to enforce its laws ... anarchy & confusion must prevail."

Just weeks later, Washington's alarm about Shays' Rebellion was a key factor in his decision to take part in -- and preside over -- the Constitutional Convention, which was supposed to offer revisions to the Articles of Confederation but instead threw out the old structure entirely and replaced it with the U.S. Constitution. The Constitution shifted national sovereignty from the 13 states to "We the People" and dramatically enhanced the power of the central government.

The key point of the Constitution was to create a peaceful means for the United States to implement policies favored by the people but within a structure of checks and balances to prevent radical changes deemed too disruptive to the established order. For instance, the two-year terms of the House of Representatives were meant to reflect the popular will but the six-year terms of the Senate were designed to temper the passions of the moment (and senators were initially chosen by state legislatures, not the people).

Within this framework of a democratic Republic -- where peaceful change was possible though intentionally gradual -- the Framers criminalized taking up arms against the government. But it was the Constitution's drastic expansion of federal power that prompted strong opposition from some Revolutionary War figures, such as Virginia's Patrick Henry who spearheaded the Anti-Federalist movement.

Prospects for the Constitution's ratification were in such doubt that its principal architect James Madison joined in a sales campaign known as the Federalist Papers in which he tried to play down how radical his changes actually were. To win over other skeptics, Madison agreed to support a Bill of Rights, which would be proposed as the first ten amendments to the Constitution. The Bill of Rights was a mix of concessions, some substantive and some rhetorical, to both individual citizens and the states.

- Advertisement -

The Second Amendment was primarily a right granted to the states. It read: "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

Madison's political maneuvering narrowly secured approval of the Constitution in key states, such as Virginia, New York and Massachusetts. The First Congress then approved the Bill of Rights, which were ratified in 1791. [For more details on the Constitution, see Robert Parry's America's Stolen Narrative.]

Behind the Second Amendment

As the preface to the Second Amendment makes clear, the concern was about enabling states to organize militias that could maintain "security," which fit with the Constitution's goal of "domestic Tranquility" within the framework of a Republic.

This concept was amplified by the actions of the Second Congress amid another uprising which erupted in 1791 in western Pennsylvania. This anti-tax revolt, known as the Whiskey Rebellion, prompted Congress in 1792 to expand on the idea of "a well-regulated militia" by passing the Militia Acts which required all military-age white males to obtain their own muskets and equipment for service in militias.

- Advertisement -

At the time, Madison was in the U.S. Congress and Washington was in the presidency -- with both supporting the new laws -- so the "original intent" of the Framers could not be easily misunderstood.

The right "to keep and bear arms" was always within the context of participating in militias -- or today the National Guard -- not as the right of individuals to possess devastating weapons that could be used to violently overthrow the U.S. government or to kill its officials. (The recognition of a collective -- rather than individual right -- was only reversed in 2008 when right-wing ideologues had gained control of the U.S. Supreme Court and then overturned more than two centuries of legal precedents.)

But if there was any doubt about how the actual Framers saw the Second Amendment, it was answered in 1794 when President Washington led a combined force of state militias against the Whiskey rebels in Pennsylvania. The revolt soon collapsed; many leaders fled; and two participants were convicted of high treason and sentenced to hanging, though Washington later pardoned them.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

Robert Parry broke many of the Iran-Contra stories in the 1980s for the Associated Press and Newsweek. His latest book, Secrecy & Privilege: Rise of the Bush Dynasty from Watergate to Iraq, can be ordered at It's also available at

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -
Google Content Matches:

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The CIA/Likud Sinking of Jimmy Carter

What Did US Spy Satellites See in Ukraine?

Ron Paul's Appalling World View

Ronald Reagan: Worst President Ever?

A Perjurer on the US Supreme Court

The Disappearance of Keith Olbermann


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
8 people are discussing this page, with 16 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

The 2nd Amendment, Batman Shooting & High Fruc... by Sara Servalis on Monday, Jan 14, 2013 at 8:12:21 PM
Sorry, but we have an outlaw government that break... by Alan 8 on Tuesday, Jan 15, 2013 at 9:56:16 AM
The author of this article constantly refers 2... by George Hug on Tuesday, Jan 15, 2013 at 11:51:14 AM
This is in reply to the article's author, not Alan... by George Hug on Tuesday, Jan 15, 2013 at 11:56:03 AM
From the framers and forefathers. Patrick Henry: ... by Kansas Bright on Tuesday, Jan 15, 2013 at 12:32:28 PM
Thomas Jefferson : "The greatest danger to... by Kansas Bright on Tuesday, Jan 15, 2013 at 12:42:42 PM
"The strongest reason for the people to reta... by Kansas Bright on Tuesday, Jan 15, 2013 at 12:49:02 PM
"The Constitution shall never be by Kansas Bright on Tuesday, Jan 15, 2013 at 12:53:21 PM
It would be DEFENDING our legitimate government, t... by Kansas Bright on Tuesday, Jan 15, 2013 at 12:59:25 PM
The requirement for all Federal and State Civil o... by Kansas Bright on Tuesday, Jan 15, 2013 at 1:04:42 PM
Federal law regulating oath of office by go... by Kansas Bright on Tuesday, Jan 15, 2013 at 1:07:17 PM
Will you please stop using these gun threads as an... by J. Edward Tremlett on Tuesday, Jan 15, 2013 at 3:46:51 PM
The historical fact is that the Second Amendment w... by E. J. N. on Tuesday, Jan 15, 2013 at 2:33:14 PM
If we can get the States to do it, while replacing... by Michael Dewey on Wednesday, Jan 16, 2013 at 3:43:41 PM
A large part of the reason for the mess we have no... by Michael Dewey on Tuesday, Jan 15, 2013 at 3:59:14 PM
"The Right's powerful propaganda apparatus has sol... by Paul Rye on Wednesday, Jan 16, 2013 at 12:06:36 AM