Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Valuable 2   Well Said 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 2/3/09:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (64 comments)

Leading Counter-Terrorism Expert and Former High-Level Official Slams War on Terror and Questions 9/11

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (3 fans)   -- Page 2 of 5 page(s)

opednews.com

GW: While there are certainly some bad guys in the world who are out to kill Americans and hurt our country, I believe that the whole Al Qaeda threat has been blown out of proportion to justify certain ulterior motives. Do you agree or disagree?

Terry Arnold: They overstated the danger ... did it from a view that justified the "war on terror". Mostly terrorists the world over are not interested in doing harm to the United States. [They are only interested in harming the U.S.] to the extent we support people who harm them.

We can defeat Al Qaeda or any other group by depriving them of their cause and by engaging them [rather than solely using a policy of blunt force].

GW: What would you tell people working at the CIA, NSA, other intelligence services, military services, special operations, etc. who sincerely believe what they've been told . . . that the war on terror is an all-out, all-or-nothing war between the good guys and the bad guys and that we have to go "kick their butt"?

Terry Arnold: We're wasting our time and money. And not doing anything useful for our reputation.

Torture


GW: Do you believe that torture decreases or increases the risk of terrorism?

Terry Arnold: It increases the risk. There is a school of thought that it is deterrence. But I do not believe that. If people's grievances multiply, you will have more terrorism. For example, military attacks in Iraq increase terrorism. If you ameliorate people's grievances, you will decrease terrorism.

GW: A high-level Special Ops interrogator said that torture by Americans of innocent Iraqis is the main reason that foreign fighters started fighting against Americans in Iraq in the first place. Do you agree?

Terry Arnold: I agree with that. What went on at Abu Gharaib was on the street before it was in the [American] media.

9/11

GW: You write:
"Washington leadership [has] brought us no closer than we were on September 12, 2001 to resolving how [9/11] was executed and by what enemy.
Let's focus on the how question first.

What facts or observations make you doubt that the official government story does not fully explain how 9/11 was carried out?

Terry Arnold: The nature of events in New York. The buildings falling down. I'm not satisfied by the notion that planes hitting buildings would have caused them to collapse. The last building to fall was not even attacked.

GW: Now let's address the question of who carried out the attacks. You write:
"They tell us repeatedly that it [9/11] was the work of al Qaida, but they have yet to show us the proofs."
As a counter-terrorism expert, what sort of proofs would you expect the government to show if al Qaeda had carried out the 9/11 attacks - at least without the help of any state?

Terry Arnold: The case has not been fully made. The official story is not too persuasive.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5

 

George Washington


As a political activist for decades, I have rejoiced in victories for the people and mourned in defeats. I chose the pen name "George Washington" because - as (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
64 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Thank you George by William Whitten on Tuesday, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:37:19 PM
Nice Work GW, by Mike Baldwin on Tuesday, Feb 3, 2009 at 7:45:15 PM
A thought for non-conspiracy folks by Perry Logan on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 6:13:05 AM
Dear Mr. Troll ... your logic again is as vapid as all your by Mr M on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 8:28:18 AM
Logan, Logan, Logan by Anti Vigilante on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 2:10:45 PM
When did Bush by albury smith on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 4:06:16 PM
Thanks for the link, Perry by albury smith on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 3:29:01 PM
Alburry by William Whitten on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 3:40:10 PM
Military Intel assets must be well paid for their time. by Richard Lee on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 8:53:13 PM
There's no law against ignorance, by albury smith on Thursday, Feb 5, 2009 at 7:08:14 AM
Obama's a political realist and opportunist. (Kucinich and by Richard Lee on Thursday, Feb 5, 2009 at 9:29:16 PM
Your worst enemy by albury smith on Thursday, Feb 5, 2009 at 10:10:02 PM
Great Theory by David Ryan on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 10:09:33 PM
Thanks for the link Perry... by David Ryan on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 10:29:19 PM
no is yes no? by William Whitten on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 3:29:16 PM
Lets Not Get Too Rational by arlen custer on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 1:58:49 PM
No Faked Evidence? by George Washington on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 2:03:43 PM
Nice job of mangling the truth, by albury smith on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 4:37:16 PM
So you're saying by George Washington on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 4:42:00 PM
No, "George," by albury smith on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 5:16:34 PM
Question by George Washington on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 5:57:47 PM
Your "experts" by albury smith on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 7:09:53 PM
Your link by David Ryan on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 10:26:17 PM
Great Point Albury by David Ryan on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 10:32:41 PM
Experts in their fields... by William Whitten on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 4:00:41 PM
Aircraft Accident Investigator for US Air force by William Whitten on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 4:05:45 PM
Lt. Col. US Marine Corps Fighter Pilot by William Whitten on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 4:16:26 PM
Lt Col. US Air Force Fighter Pilot Aerospace Engineer by William Whitten on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 4:28:58 PM
Nice spamfest, by albury smith on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 4:46:11 PM
Heres the situation hat shot: by William Whitten on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 5:17:31 PM
Reality check, "hat shot" by albury smith on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 5:34:48 PM
Pilot who actually flew two of the actual planes by William Whitten on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 5:11:17 PM
Former NORAD Officer by William Whitten on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 5:15:11 PM
Military Historian, US Army War College by William Whitten on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 5:23:57 PM
Able Danger by William Whitten on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 5:28:23 PM
So all bury you chew on these awhile... by William Whitten on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 5:37:28 PM
You are Failing your quiz all bury.......... by William Whitten on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 5:44:49 PM
Civil Engineer & Fire Protection Engineer by William Whitten on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 5:52:56 PM
all bury by William Whitten on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 6:29:04 PM
"inadequaite [sic] and irrelivant [sic]" by albury smith on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 7:26:45 PM
Actually it does sound rational by David Ryan on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 10:37:57 PM
You mean no government paycheck this month? by Richard Lee on Thursday, Feb 5, 2009 at 9:42:45 PM
No, I don't recall that memo, by albury smith on Friday, Feb 6, 2009 at 6:23:46 AM
all bury, you are not keeping up! by William Whitten on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 6:01:42 PM
Live TV Coverage by William Whitten on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 6:12:02 PM
Which building? by albury smith on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 7:34:56 PM
No explosives in the WTC? by David Ryan on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 10:55:00 PM
Why are you asking William? by David Ryan on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 10:58:44 PM
jet fuel/kerosene by William Whitten on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 6:23:40 PM
What a bunch of crap by albury smith on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 7:57:43 PM
Demolitions Expert by William Whitten on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 6:37:43 PM
LOL by albury smith on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 6:59:01 PM
Nice talking to ya... by William Whitten on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 8:06:49 PM
albury by arlen custer on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 9:09:34 PM
Here are some legitimate questions for you, by albury smith on Thursday, Feb 5, 2009 at 1:06:29 PM
albury you are truly something. But what? by arlen custer on Friday, Feb 6, 2009 at 9:14:36 AM
The last place you want to go by albury smith on Friday, Feb 6, 2009 at 10:42:29 AM
How much time will I waste on You? by arlen custer on Friday, Feb 6, 2009 at 6:10:12 PM
It never ceases to amaze me by albury smith on Friday, Feb 6, 2009 at 9:23:47 PM
My Last Word To All You Official Theororists by arlen custer on Saturday, Feb 7, 2009 at 12:22:04 PM
Frank A. DeMartini by Aurora on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 7:15:54 PM
Leslie E. Robertson by albury smith on Friday, Feb 6, 2009 at 12:31:23 PM
More than 660 Engineers and Architects by Aurora on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 7:24:22 PM
Apparently so... by David Ryan on Wednesday, Feb 4, 2009 at 11:03:46 PM