Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   News 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 2/8/09:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (61 comments)

Kevorkian: The Right to Die and Other 9th Amendment Freedoms

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (2 fans)   -- Page 2 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

Zaritsky raises the issue of our inalienable right to commit suicide – whether ill or not.  Kevorkian considers laws that ban suicide and iatric euthanasia "worse than immoral.  They are downright illegal."  In Cornucopia, Kevorkian defends the Ninth Amendment as "the twenty-one most important words in the U.S. Constitution."

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Human rights are not limited to those named in the Constitution, and laws that block those rights are unconstitutional.  Just as a woman has a natural born right to abort a fetus, and everyone has a natural right to choose whom to love and marry, all humans have a right to choose the timing and manner of their own demise.  In Cornucopia, Kevorkian details several natural rights that he deems the "hallmark of a truly enlightened democracy."  He prefaces them with:

"The first one listed below subsumes all the others which are mere corollaries, and its emphasized qualifying admonition also pertains to all of them.  Therefore, I have a basic natural right:

  • To do or not to do and to say or not to say anything, anywhere, to anybody, at any time, in any way, so long as anyone else and/or his or her property are not verifiably threatened or harmed, and no personal obligation is imposed on anybody without the latter's consent;
  • To choose with whom and/or what to associate and/or deal, and whom or what to shun;
  • To refuse to cooperate with and/or participate in any coercive endeavor;
  • To choose where, when, and how to live and to die;
  • To express openly anywhere, at any time, in any way, and by any means one's opinion;
  • To possess and/or carry anything on one's person;
  • To create and/or destroy anything of one's own;
  • To eschew public or religious education for one's children to be tutored privately;
  • To operate any vehicle without using helmets or belts;
  • To choose to indulge in mutually voluntary commercial or recreational coitus;
  • To choose whom one will live with, love, and/or marry;
  • To choose to do anything that may affect one's own body externally or internally, including the purchase of another's or the sale of one's own, bodily organ(s) or part(s) thereof for medical purposes;
  • To choose to read and/or write anything, for any purpose, and to create and/or see any visual presentation;
  • To choose to legally procure and to display or to destroy one's private property, or on property for use by the public, any symbols or flags of any group or nation;
  • Etc., etc., etc."

    Dr. Jack Kevorkian's compassionate and common sense approach to ending human suffering is but one facet of his decades-long advocacy of the Ninth Amendment.  Like Henry David Thoreau, Nelson Mandela, and Aung San Suu Kyi, Kevorkian was wrongfully imprisoned for advocating human rights.  He warned the audience, "To be active, you must be committed.  To be committed is dangerous."  That is especially true in a police state with the highest incarceration rate in the world.

    For more information, see this partial international list of right-to-die organizations or this one.  Also recommended is Susan Stern's 2005 award-winning documentary, The Self Made Man.

  • Cited in the Tampa Bay Examiner.

    Next Page  1  |  2

  •  

    In 2004, Rady Ananda joined the growing community of citizen journalists. Initially focused on elections, she investigated the 2004 Ohio election, organizing, training and leading several forays into counties to photograph the 2004 ballots. She officially served at three recounts, including the 2004 recount. She also organized and led the team that audited Franklin County Ohio's 2006 election, proving the number of voter signatures did not match official results. Her work appears in three books.

    Her blogs also address religious, gender, sexual and racial equality, as well as environmental issues; and are sprinkled with book and film reviews on various topics. She spent most of her working life as a researcher or investigator for private lawyers, and five years as an editor.

    She graduated from The Ohio State University's School of Agriculture in December 2003 with a B.S. in Natural Resources.

    All material offered here is the property of Rady Ananda, copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009. Permission is granted to repost, with proper attribution including the original link.

    "In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." Tell the truth anyway.

    The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
    and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

    Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

     

    Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

    Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

    Comments

    The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

    This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

    Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
    61 comments
    To view all comments:
    Expand Comments
    (Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

    Thanks for this article, Rady. by GLloyd Rowsey on Sunday, Feb 8, 2009 at 7:52:16 PM
    a hero to me, too by Rady Ananda on Sunday, Feb 8, 2009 at 8:35:36 PM
    Great article, Rady. by Darren Wolfe on Sunday, Feb 8, 2009 at 9:26:37 PM
    now about legalizing marijuana by Rady Ananda on Sunday, Feb 8, 2009 at 9:39:56 PM
    Bushites by Laurie Mitchell on Wednesday, Feb 11, 2009 at 2:03:16 PM
    there's little to commend the Bush-Cheney coup by Rady Ananda on Wednesday, Feb 11, 2009 at 9:28:09 PM
    Don't bother with the christianity argument? by Katrin R. on Friday, Feb 13, 2009 at 2:39:55 AM
    comparison by Katrin R. on Friday, Feb 13, 2009 at 3:02:01 AM
    PS by Katrin R. on Friday, Feb 13, 2009 at 3:15:41 AM
    NOT TRUE, FALSE, IN ERROR by tabonsell on Monday, Feb 9, 2009 at 2:57:11 PM
    Quotes: by Darren Wolfe on Monday, Feb 9, 2009 at 8:17:14 PM
    wow - nice research, Darren by Rady Ananda on Monday, Feb 9, 2009 at 9:21:22 PM
    ON THE FEDERALIST PAPERS by tabonsell on Tuesday, Feb 10, 2009 at 2:10:28 PM
    Clarence Thomas' take on the subject: by Darren Wolfe on Tuesday, Feb 10, 2009 at 7:43:50 PM
    PS by tabonsell on Tuesday, Feb 10, 2009 at 3:52:58 PM
    RIP by Darren Wolfe on Tuesday, Feb 10, 2009 at 7:28:31 PM
    Thx, Rady, glad you're inspired by Darren Wolfe on Tuesday, Feb 10, 2009 at 7:54:38 PM
    What was Patrick Henry's alternative? by Rady Ananda on Wednesday, Feb 11, 2009 at 9:24:12 PM
    Patrick Henry's alternative by Darren Wolfe on Thursday, Feb 12, 2009 at 9:53:31 AM
    damn - this is total news to me by Rady Ananda on Thursday, Feb 12, 2009 at 9:50:35 PM
    Do you have a link to the articles of that alternative? by Brett Paatsch on Thursday, Feb 12, 2009 at 11:16:30 PM
    Art of Confed by Rady Ananda on Friday, Feb 13, 2009 at 6:55:26 PM
    Thanks for the links Rady by Brett Paatsch on Friday, Feb 13, 2009 at 9:05:19 PM
    sorry to dip by Rady Ananda on Saturday, Feb 14, 2009 at 8:07:31 PM
    Yes, thanks Rady, you made me want to look up the ninth by Brett Paatsch on Sunday, Feb 8, 2009 at 9:40:38 PM
    I LOVE 100-word sentences by Rady Ananda on Sunday, Feb 8, 2009 at 11:02:36 PM
    Yes. by Brett Paatsch on Sunday, Feb 8, 2009 at 11:25:01 PM
    Rady by Katrin R. on Sunday, Feb 8, 2009 at 11:10:17 PM
    Challenge/question for Rady - if you choose to accept it ;-) by Brett Paatsch on Sunday, Feb 8, 2009 at 11:21:50 PM
    want to add something by Katrin R. on Sunday, Feb 8, 2009 at 11:41:17 PM
    A matter of compassion by Rady Ananda on Sunday, Feb 8, 2009 at 11:54:13 PM
    Rights for one.... by Doc "Old Codger" McCoy on Monday, Feb 9, 2009 at 12:41:40 AM
    very good comment, Codger. by Katrin R. on Monday, Feb 9, 2009 at 1:52:55 AM
    But Katrin, by GLloyd Rowsey on Monday, Feb 9, 2009 at 7:34:45 AM
    Thanks by Katrin R. on Monday, Feb 9, 2009 at 9:45:34 AM
    Right On by GLloyd Rowsey on Monday, Feb 9, 2009 at 7:24:58 AM
    agree with old codger by Rady Ananda on Monday, Feb 9, 2009 at 1:09:46 PM
    'Death with Dignity' by Katrin R. on Monday, Feb 9, 2009 at 3:04:55 AM
    PS by Katrin R. on Monday, Feb 9, 2009 at 3:40:17 AM
    That's a heap of Reality, by GLloyd Rowsey on Monday, Feb 9, 2009 at 10:24:13 AM
    yes, it's a heap...there is so much to this by Katrin R. on Monday, Feb 9, 2009 at 10:48:00 AM
    Doctor K is working at a different level. by GLloyd Rowsey on Monday, Feb 9, 2009 at 12:17:46 PM
    The Ninth Amendment by Michael Richardson on Monday, Feb 9, 2009 at 10:18:53 AM
    Rady! Help. by GLloyd Rowsey on Monday, Feb 9, 2009 at 12:32:26 PM
    Reply to Brett by Rady Ananda on Monday, Feb 9, 2009 at 12:57:21 PM
    thanks, Michael by Rady Ananda on Monday, Feb 9, 2009 at 1:12:02 PM
    A Question I Have by Dennis Kaiser on Monday, Feb 9, 2009 at 3:10:57 PM
    BILL OF RIGHTS by tabonsell on Monday, Feb 9, 2009 at 3:31:11 PM
    ERROR ALERT, ERROR ALERT by tabonsell on Tuesday, Feb 10, 2009 at 1:13:18 PM
    TA Bonsell by Brett Paatsch on Tuesday, Feb 10, 2009 at 8:51:53 PM
    yep, let's keep this civil by Rady Ananda on Wednesday, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:29:04 AM
    I'm reading too or rereading some stuff I've read before by Brett Paatsch on Wednesday, Feb 11, 2009 at 7:16:46 AM
    rights as a human construct by Rady Ananda on Wednesday, Feb 11, 2009 at 9:20:12 PM
    Think of it rather as rights as social construct where by Brett Paatsch on Thursday, Feb 12, 2009 at 8:19:00 PM
    we do agree on all points of substance by Rady Ananda on Friday, Feb 13, 2009 at 7:09:16 PM
    Kevorkians caveats aren't being respected by world leaders by Brett Paatsch on Friday, Feb 13, 2009 at 9:27:48 PM
    This is key: by GLloyd Rowsey on Saturday, Feb 14, 2009 at 6:54:26 AM
    I think its key or core too by Brett Paatsch on Saturday, Feb 14, 2009 at 7:16:56 PM
    God, it's hard to keep up with these comments! by Katrin R. on Saturday, Feb 14, 2009 at 9:31:55 PM
    Let's see what Article I, Section 8, paragraph 16 says by Brett Paatsch on Tuesday, Feb 10, 2009 at 10:16:17 PM
    TA Bonsell changed his mind he meant and corrected by Brett Paatsch on Tuesday, Feb 10, 2009 at 10:28:54 PM

     

    Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend


    Copyright © 2002-2012, OpEdNews

    Powered by Populum