Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 5 Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (5 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   1 comment

General News

Jeremiah Goulka: Playing the ID Card

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 2 of 4 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to None 10/15/12

Become a Fan
  (23 fans)
- Advertisement -

I must admit that I did occasionally wonder whether there were any Republican machines out there, and the more I heard about the dominating one in neighboring DuPage County, the less I wanted to know.  (Ditto Florida in 2000.)  Still, I knew -- I knew -- that the Dems would use any crooked tool in the box to steal elections.  Therefore America needed cleaner elections, and cleaner elections meant voter ID laws.

Doesn't Everyone Have an ID?

Every once in a while I'd hear the complaint -- usually from a Democrat -- that such laws were "racist."  Racist?  How could they be when they were so commonsensical?  The complainers, I figured, were talking nonsense, just another instance of the tiresome PC brigade slapping the race card on the table for partisan advantage.  If only they would scrap their tedious, tendentious identity and victim politics and come join the rest of us in the business of America.

All this held until one night in 2006.  At the time, my roommate worked at a local bank branch, and that evening when we got into a conversation, he mentioned to me that the bank required two forms of identification to open an account.  Of course, who wouldn't?  But then he told me this crazy thing: customers would show up with only one ID or none at all -- and it wasn't like they had left them at home.

"Really ?" I said, blown away by the thought of it.

"Yeah, really."

And here was the kicker: every single one of them was black and poor.  As I've written elsewhere, this was one of the moments that opened my eyes to a broader reality which, in the end, caused me to quit the Republican Party.

I had no idea.  I had naturally assumed -- to the extent that I even gave it a thought -- that every adult had to have at least one ID.  Like most everyone in my world, I've had two or three at any given time since the day I turned 16 and begged my parents to take me to the DMV.

- Advertisement -

Until then, I couldn't imagine how voter ID laws might be about anything but fraud.  That no longer held up for the simple reason that, in the minds of Republican operators and voters alike, there is a pretty simple equation: Black + Poor = Democrat.  And if that was the case, and the poor and black were more likely to lack IDs, then how could those laws not be aimed at them?

Whenever I tell people this story, most Republicans and some Democrats are shocked.  Like me, they had no idea that there are significant numbers of adults out there who don't have IDs.

Of course, had I bothered to look, the information about this was hiding in plain sight.  According to the respected Brennan Center for Justice at the New York University School of Law, 7% of the general voting public doesn't have an adequate photo ID, but those figures rise precipitously when you hit certain groups: 15% of voting age citizens making less than $35,000 a year, 18% of Americans over 65, and a full quarter of African Americans.

A recent study by other researchers focusing on the swing-state of Pennsylvania found that one in seven voters there lack an ID -- one in three in Philadelphia -- with minorities far more likely than whites to fall into this category.  In fact, every study around notes this disparate demographic trend, even the low-number outlier study preferred by Hans van Spakovsky, the conservative Heritage Foundation's voter "integrity" activist: its authors still found that "registered voters without photo IDs tended to be female, African-American, and Democrat."

The "R" Bomb

- Advertisement -

The more I thought about it, the more I understood why Democrats claim that these laws are racist.  By definition, a law that intentionally imposes more burdens on minorities than on whites is racist, even if that imposition is indirect.  Seeing these laws as distant relatives of literacy tests and poll taxes no longer seemed so outrageous to me.

After I became a Democrat, I tried explaining this to some of the Republicans in my life, but I quickly saw that I had crossed an invisible tripwire.  You see, if you ever want to get a Republican to stop listening to you, just say the "R" word: racism.  In my Republican days, any time a Democrat started talking about how some Republican policy or act was racist, I rolled my eyes and thought Reagan-esquely, there they go again"

We loathed identity politics, which we viewed as invidious -- as well as harmful to minorities.  And the "race card" was so simplistic, so partisan, so boring.  Besides, what about all that reverse discrimination?  Now that was racist.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

 

Tom Engelhardt, who runs the Nation Institute's Tomdispatch.com ("a regular antidote to the mainstream media"), is the co-founder of the American Empire Project and, most recently, the author of Mission Unaccomplished: Tomdispatch (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Tomgram: Nick Turse, Uncovering the Military's Secret Military

Christian Parenti: Big Storms Require Big Government

Andy Kroll: Flat-Lining the Middle Class

Noam Chomsky: A Rebellious World or a New Dark Age?

Noam Chomsky, Who Owns the World?

Rebecca Solnit: Why the Media Loves the Violence of Protestors and Not of Banks

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

What about college students who claim to be reside... by Joel Keller on Monday, Oct 15, 2012 at 12:53:56 PM