Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 3   Supported 3   Valuable 2   View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (14 comments)

Israel and Iran: one spark could ignite a Middle East inferno

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (51 fans)   -- Page 2 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

If Israel finally goes off the deep end and initiates an attack, then all hell will break loose. What will Saudi Arabia, Syria, Egypt, Turkey and other surrounding nations do? Will they sit by and watch Israel bring the region to a boiling point, or will they immediately take sides and retaliate in any number of destructive ways?

What would Russia and China do? Both of these very powerful nations have direct interests in Iran that largely involve natural resources. Both have supplied Iran with sophisticated missiles. Will they just let the Middle East go in flames? I think not! What they would do is uncertain but to think that they will not enter the conflict in some way is wishful thinking. This could turn into a world nightmare of untold proportions, a scenario that we do not want to witness.

In a recent speech before the United Nations Security Council, President Obama called for a nuclear weapons-free world and a strengthening of the NNPT. The Security Council unanimously passed a U.S.-drafted resolution that endorses the eventual goal of "a world without nuclear weapons." It lays out steps for nuclear powers to trim their arsenals, while making it harder for other nations to convert civilian nuclear programs to military ones.

Hopefully, this program will get underway soon. But we know how slowly the wheels of the UN turn. So, in order to lay the groundwork for its eventual implementation, I would urge President Obama to start discussions with Israel that will result in opening up their nuclear program to UN inspection and to pressure them to join the NNPT. That, most likely, will probably be a near impossible outcome given Israel's rigid stance and agenda.

In the event that they should adamantly refuse to become a partner in the pursuit to eliminate nuclear weapons, then it will be time for the nations of the world to institute a comprehensive boycott that would put severe restrictions on their exports as well as their imports. That is not a radical idea since more and more nations seem to be coming to this conclusion. And any number of influential writers are suggesting the same.

Refusing to ship them needed products and materials, and ceasing major imports from Israel, is entirely feasible and relatively easy to implement. Taking such action would have an immediate, serious impact on Israel's economy and would make it clear to them that the world community of nations will no longer tolerate their belligerent attitude toward other nations. It could be the best way to force them to change their behavior and, best of all, it would involve no dangerous military actions.

The world cannot continue to look away and give a free pass to Israel any longer. It cannot allow that nation to escalate this dangerous situation into a Middle East inferno.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Michael Payne is an independent progressive activist. His articles concentrate on social, economic and political matters as well as American foreign policy. He is a U.S. Army veteran and a graduate of Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois. His (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
14 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

What Business Is It of Yours? by Jason Paz on Tuesday, Oct 13, 2009 at 9:53:20 AM
none of my business? by michael payne on Tuesday, Oct 13, 2009 at 12:10:47 PM
What business is it of yours? by Nick van Nes on Tuesday, Oct 13, 2009 at 1:38:33 PM
What business is it of yours? by michael payne on Tuesday, Oct 13, 2009 at 5:50:27 PM
Amen to this by Nick van Nes on Tuesday, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:18:49 AM
Absolutely right, Nick! by Robert Hoogenboom on Tuesday, Oct 13, 2009 at 5:05:13 PM
A little recent history for you Mr. Winslow, there was a by Stanimal on Tuesday, Oct 13, 2009 at 7:49:31 PM
That link should be by Robert Hoogenboom on Wednesday, Oct 14, 2009 at 8:10:16 AM
To Smoke us: That's the plan by Patrick on Tuesday, Oct 13, 2009 at 12:04:31 PM
To this I would argue by Nick van Nes on Tuesday, Oct 13, 2009 at 7:07:06 PM
Hurray for Michael Payne! by GLloyd Rowsey on Tuesday, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:18:43 PM
The Australian Light Horse Took Beer Sheva by Jason Paz on Wednesday, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:31:20 AM
You frequently refer to your place of residence, Jase, by GLloyd Rowsey on Wednesday, Oct 14, 2009 at 8:16:31 AM
Far out! by Robert Hoogenboom on Wednesday, Oct 14, 2009 at 8:43:36 AM