On May 27, 2014, the Supreme Court mailed to Rotem a copy of the March 3, 2008 "Judgment" in his case. The purportedly certified record of High Court of Justice March 3, 2008 "Judgment" is not signed by the judges, bears only half a stamp of the seal of the court, bears a false certification statement ("Copying is True to the Original" instead of "True Copy of the Original"), the name and authority of the person who signed the certification are not shown, in the footnote it bears the disclaimer, "Subject to editing and phrasing changes", and the record was received with no accompanying letter from the office of the clerk of the court (no authentication).
A reasonable person would conclude that the Israeli Supreme Court issued in 2008 a simulated (bluff) "Judgment" record on Rafi Rotem's petition, but effectively denied Rafi Rotem access to the court and equal protection under the law. Likewise, a reasonable person would conclude that the purportedly certified copy of the March 3, 2008 "Judgment" record is fraud and/or forgery.
Denial of access to the court and denial of equal protection for war hero Moti Ashkenazi and other victims of corruption in the Debtors' Courts [v]
Moti Ashkenazi, commander of the only bunker on the Bar-Lev line that survived the Egyptian assault in the 1973 war. His petition, Ashkenazi+76 others v Minister of Justice et al (2300/11), seeking protection against corruption in the Debtors' Courts, has been subjected to simulated "preliminary proceedings" with no basis in the law of the State of Israel for over 3 years.
___
In the petition Ashkenazi+76 others v Minister of Justice et al (2300/11), war hero Moti Ashkenazi and others sought equal protection against corruption of the Israel Debtors' Courts. The records of the Debtors' Court show enormous fraud being perpetrated by banks and large corporations against the debtors as a routine. However, the petition was limited to one aberration: The Debtors' Courts arbitrarily stopped several years ago the service of its decisions, longer than 17 lines, on the debtors. The debt holders continue to receive service of such decisions by email. The authorities do not deny the facts in this petition. Instead, they alternatively claim that the service of the decisions is not possible due to computer-software problems, or due to paper-envelope size...
The Israeli Supreme Court has conducted in this case "preliminary proceedings" with no basis in the law of the State of Israel for over three years, issued numerous decision records, and held three hearings on the matter, still in progress.
Review of the court file record in this case reveals numerous critical defects. First and foremost among them - summonses are missing in this case.
The office of the clerk of the Supreme Court claims that the summonses are "self-eliminating electronic records", which destroy themselves after the date of appearance. [vi]
The Supreme Court also refuses to certify its own decisions in this case, served unsigned, uncertified, with the disclaimer "subject to editing and phrasing changes", and with no accompanying letter by the Clerk of the Court.
A reasonable person would conclude that the Israeli Supreme Court is conducting simulated (bluff) proceedings in this case as well.
Corrupt records in the case of violent, convicted former policeman, who engaged in repeat violence in the OccupyTLV camp under patronage of the Israel police [vii]
Complaints filed with the Israeli Attorney General and Department of Police Investigations document that former policeman Uriel Benveniste, who had been convicted on serious violent crimes and served a prison sentence, engages in repeat serious violence in the OccupyTLV camp under patronage of the Israel police. The records of his Supreme Court case in his case are corrupted, with a docket failing to show any records, except for one decision, and the case fails to appear in default index search.
Next Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
