Tag(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats

Interview with Jarek Kupsc, Director, Writer and Star of "The Reflecting Pool" – Part III

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (7 fans)   -- Page 2 of 3 page(s)

opednews.com

 

It depends on who you are, what you do and what your status is. 

 

If you had someone like…let’s just drop this celebrity…it’s just not going anywhere.

 

Bonanno: All right.

 

Kupsc: I fully understand.  I did send Charlie Sheen and Martin Sheen a copy of the movie.  I tried to get a hold of Sean Penn, not in terms of performing in the film.  We need the support of these people with credibility or credentials, if you will, to speak out on 9/11.

 

I was hoping I would hear back from Charlie or I could get through to Sean to see what they think about it or see if they could support our movie and I never heard anything back.

 

What we really need, not just for the movie, but for the 9/11 Truth Movement, is for one respected journalist such as Seymour Hirsch of The New Yorker to do an investigative piece connecting all the dots, all the loose ends, wrapping it up in a story.

 

They did a great job in The New Yorker with the Abu Ghraib prison scandal.  They broke the story in The New Yorker.  Why couldn’t they do something similar with 9/11?

 

Mother Jones or Harper’s…it’s a moot point, really, to say this because the answer is obvious.  They can not put their ass on the line.

 

All it would take for people’s opinion to turn on a dime is for one journalist such as Si Hirsch to write about it.

 

Bonanno: There’s a scene in the movie in which Prokop is on a beach or near a dock – there’s water.  There’s a guy that Prokop meets there.  Prokop says, “You’re the only one who’s written about Building 7.”

 

According to what McGuire, Prokop’s editor, says in the beginning of the movie, the movie takes place 5 years after the events of 9/11.

 

We all know that people like Thierry Meyssan and David Ray Griffin had written about 9/11 before 2006. 

 

Yet, the story line seems to indicate that the possibility of an alternative explanation for what happened on 9/11 was coming to light in 2006.

 

Was this intentional?  Did you mean to imply that 9/11 hadn’t been researched prior to the time frame in the movie?

 

Kupsc: What you’re leading to is why didn’t I bring out any of the 9/11 research?

 

Bonanno: Was it your intention to make it appear that research had just begun?

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

Michael Bonanno is an associate editor for OpEdNews.

He is also a published poet, essayist and musician who lives in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Bonanno is a political progressive, not a Democratic Party apologist. He believes it's (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments