52 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 21 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

If we Turn Our Backs on god, god (and war) Will be in big Trouble

By       (Page 2 of 3 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   2 comments
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Michael Bonanno
Become a Fan
  (7 fans)

Of course, there was the flood.   God obviously based this action upon a poll he had ordered of all of humanity, even those who lived in places that those in today's Middle East wouldn't hear about for millennia.   Of all of the people living upon the earth, god's poll must have shown that fewer than 50% of all human beings weren't behaving themselves.   So, instead of saving the 49% that were, god ordered a great rain which turned into a great flood which wiped out all but one family and, supposedly, two of every kind of creature which inhabited the earth.   Noah, his family and some animals got to float atop god's great flood while innocent men, women and children, even infants, and helpless animals, were drowned to death, one of the slowest and most frightening forms of death.  

There's no amount of good in the rest of the entire Judeo/Christian Bible that can make up for the very few instances to which I've referenced here.   No sermon on a mount, no helping his favorites, The Israelites, no amount of good resides in those wicked books that should make those who are enamored of the death penalty feel that god shouldn't be injected with the most hideous of fatal drugs or hung from the neck until dead.

So, the question, again, is this the god on whom we've turned our backs?   Is this what's going to get America into trouble?   I might believe it if I believed that this particular being, as anthropomorphized in those sick publications, really existed.   I would believe it because this sick mother can cause some trouble, even for those who don't deserve it.

I don't believe my colleague was referring to Allah, the Muslim god, birthed, by the way, from the same Abrahamic rubbish.

Here's the catch 22 as I see it.

No one in his or her right mind would prefer to be in a state of war as opposed to a state of peace.

However, most of us in our right minds are, like it or not, in a state of war.   Those who are playing with this state are perpetuating it as part of their games.

The leaders of The FUSA lie and rile up people who, subsequently, revert to pre-civilized instinctive behavior.   However, the so called holy books were written after the dawn of civilization and they contain descriptions of acts which today's human beings should look upon as pre-civilized acts.   Not only are these acts supported by the various gods of the books, but, in many cases, they're committed by the so called creator(s) of civilization him (them) selves.

Religion is looked upon as very civilized.   In order to belong to the leadership of the most populous organized religions, one has to attend many years of university and seminary study.   Yet, once the leadership of many of these religions graduate and become ordained leaders, they begin to support some of the most horrendous and horrific acts visited upon the human race.

They also support the books' content that those who do not believe in the books' messages aren't worthy of life.   Some of it is in reference to some kind of afterlife, but much of it deals directly with our earthly existence.   The words "heathen" and "infidel" thread their way through these books of faith and people who have spent life times studying and learning exhort their followers to believe that these books hold the reality of a successful existence.   The existence, again, will not only successfully bring you eternal happiness after death, but guidelines tell the followers what is and is not a successful earthly existence.

In The Torah, The Christian Bible and The Quran, having enemies is as natural as breathing.   Warnings against those who don't believe are constantly issued.   Mass murder or genocide is shown to be a legitimate way to solve problems.

Governments tell lies and not only rile up people who revert to pre-civilized instinctive behavior, but rile up people who use these horrible, hate and violence filled books to justify tossing away civilized behavior, allowing pre-civilized instinct to motivate them.

Supporters of the holy books say that they can be interpreted however one wishes to interpret them.   They all point to sections of their books which call for love and tolerance.   They don't deny that the books encourage their followers to destroy those with whom they disagree; they merely say that, along with the unthinkable, there is good.

Let's see what happens if we use this logic in the case of an abused wife.   Say to her, "Sure, he becomes violent at times and beats you.   Yes, he's broken your limbs as well as your spirit.   But let's not forget who drives you to the emergency room and kisses your forehead, telling you that everything will be all right.   It's he, for he is a kind and loving husband."

We're at war now.   We were in a state of war for the greater part of the twentieth century and we're not starting the twenty-first century much better.

Although they didn't get the attention that antiwar protestors received during the Vietnam War or are receiving today, people did march against World War I, World War II and Korea.   There were marches and arrests.   Protestors didn't join the violence.   They protested peacefully and the wars ended when the game players were damn well ready to end them.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Michael Bonanno Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Michael Bonanno is an associate editor for OpEdNews.

He is also a published poet, essayist and musician who lives in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Bonanno is a political progressive, not a Democratic Party apologist. He believes it's (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Teabaggers; Children of the Sixties?

It's OK to say "Merry Christmas"

Is The Constitution Really That Unfair?

Will "Americans Elect" Their President in 2012?

Why Anarchism, Communism and Libertarianism are Pipe Dreams

LA Socialist Party Local Holds Organizing Meeting (Discussion with Mimi Soltysik, Local Chair)

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend