Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   13 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

If Increased Sanction Resolution, 362, Could Give Bush License for a Naval Blockade Why Support It?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 2 of 4 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 6/30/08

Become a Fan
  (8 fans)

When pressed by Rob that comments coming in to him were pointing to a Naval blockade, Rep. Wexler dismissed it by saying there is no language in the resolution that calls for a Naval blockade. Again, the word "blockade" is not used. But, any effort to prevent supplies from reaching a country - which this resolution calls for - is after all a blockade.

Ultimately, the congressman conceded that he understood the "concern that the mechanism of enforcement in theory might be a Naval blockade." "But," he explained, "that’s the use of a military confrontation act and that is not something that I would support unless there was prior congressional approval. I understand the concern particularly in that it’s President Bush that we are talking about, but I don’t think reasonably that there is any language in 362 that authorizes a Naval blockade. If there is, I would not have signed it."

I asked, "What then would imposing stringent inspection requirements on persons, vehicles, ships - what would that look like then?" Rep. Wexler replied, "It’s a good question." So pleased was I that I asked a "good question," I failed to recognize that the conversation drifted into a discussion over the concern of a "nuclearization" of the Middle East and the question was never addressed. Lesson learned.

Often times what is not written into legislation or little things that are inserted such as "inter alia" can be far more damaging than what is actually written.

What lessons have we learned from the Bush administration? 1. If the President and Vice President are given a blank check, for example the 2001 "Authorization for Use of Military Force," they will surely take full advantage of it. 2. If the President and Vice President are not given permission by Congress to wreak havoc - they will anyway.

Follow-Through

One attribute, among others, that separates Rep. Wexler from many of his colleagues on the Hill is his willingness to engage in dialogue beyond the perfunctory sound bite. One thing about Rob Kall, editor and publisher of OpEdNews.com is his drive to go the extra mile. Not a common practice these days in the corporate-owned mainstream media. Rob, looking to clarify some issues regarding 362, reached out the following day to Congressman Wexler who readily agreed to continue the conversation. Read Rob’s article about the media aspect of this here.

The dominant theme presented to Rep. Wexler in follow-up was the question of what really is going to keep President Bush, who already unilaterally and preemptively attacked a sovereign nation with no repercussions from a Democratic majority, from repeating the scenario with Iran.

Rep. Wexler, in his reply, held fast to his belief that H. Con. Res. 362 would not open the door to any military action by the U.S. against Iran. He explained, "First and foremost H. Con. Res. 362 is a non-binding resolution which is only a statement/expression of Congress without any force of law."

While it is true that the resolution is non-binding. It is ironic that a non-binding resolution would "demand" the President take a specific action. Even more ironic is the fact that what is being asked seems to be right up the Bush administration’s alley.

Mr. Wexler again reiterated that "nothing in this resolution shall be construed as an authorization of the use of force against Iran."

But, if the President takes the direction to, for example, prohibit export of refined petroleum products to Iran or restrict movement of Iranian officials who are not involved in negotiating the suspension of Iran’s "pursuit of nuclear weapons," and it triggers a military conflict which in all likelihood Bush will not back away from, Congress can wash their hands and say, "Hey, we said there was nothing in our resolution that authorized that."

Congressman Wexler, in his follow-up with Rob Kall, emphasized again the call for all this to happen with the support of the international community.

The issue of an international context was reinforced in a dismissive reply on June 25 by Ackerman and Pence who claim criticism of the resolution is "utter nonsense."

The resolution does demand that the President "initiate an international effort." Is it enough for the President to place a few calls to "initiate" an international effort and then call it a day? I don’t know. The resolution doesn’t say. What it also doesn’t say is that the actions demanded within the resolution require UN approval.

Many believe the fact that the U.S. unilaterally attacked Iraq was not the overriding problem in 2003. Would support of the international community have made our venture into Iraq acceptable and legitimate? I think not.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Say No to H. Con. Res. 362

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

http://bit.ly/birenpics

Cheryl Biren is a Philadelphia-based researcher, writer, editor and photographer with a focus on social justice. From 2007-2011, she served on the editorial board of Opednews.com.

Cheryl has also consulted for the Rob Kall Radio Show with (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Breaking Camp: Veterans Occupy National Archives Building

Nancy Pelosi Book Signing: Know Your Power, Just Don't Speak Truth to It

Animal Rights Activists Confront Parents at Ringling Bros. Circus

Meet the Protester Who 'May Have Received a Minor Injury' at the Hofstra Debate

Veterans Want YOU for Civil Resistance!

NJ Congressman: Bush Admin. Will 'Gulf of Tonkinize' Iran

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
9 people are discussing this page, with 13 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
This is a shameful resolution and you are right to... by Country M on Tuesday, Jul 1, 2008 at 8:44:35 AM
Thought I had included some of this in m... by Cheryl Biren on Tuesday, Jul 1, 2008 at 1:47:41 PM
I'm very aware of how much time, sweat and hea... by Rob Kall on Tuesday, Jul 1, 2008 at 11:14:24 AM
I too believe that the wording could easily lead s... by Leon on Wednesday, Jul 2, 2008 at 12:43:54 AM
I have a hard time understanding why Wexler would ... by Jim Freeman on Tuesday, Jul 1, 2008 at 2:24:15 PM
thank you jim for your generous comment. ah yes, m... by Cheryl Biren on Wednesday, Jul 2, 2008 at 1:16:14 AM
So you’re confused about this resolution and... by Robert McElroy on Tuesday, Jul 1, 2008 at 7:06:04 PM
for your comments. actually, i'm not feeling a... by Cheryl Biren on Tuesday, Jul 1, 2008 at 7:25:53 PM
In international law a naval blockade is considere... by Johnny E on Tuesday, Jul 1, 2008 at 10:31:19 PM
oppose this? There is nothing on their website. Th... by Jim Harris on Wednesday, Jul 2, 2008 at 1:22:06 AM
Good question. I haven't heard anything about ... by Cheryl Biren on Wednesday, Jul 2, 2008 at 7:01:48 AM
You know the old saying, "if it quacks like a... by Sam Adams on Wednesday, Jul 2, 2008 at 5:08:46 AM
You're pretty much on the mark, Sam. I'd a... by Robert McElroy on Wednesday, Jul 2, 2008 at 8:43:43 AM