Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 3 Share on StumbleUpon 1 Tell A Friend 4 (9 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   5 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Going Rogue: The Audacity of Assassination

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 2 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 3   Must Read 2   Supported 2  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H2 6/4/12

Become a Fan
  (28 fans)
- Advertisement -

How many '08 Obama fans imagined their critic of overwrought militarism would 1) refuse to dispute militarism as universal strategy, or 2) outdo Bush, Cheney and perhaps McCain? If massive civilian drone deaths ever get recorded with the precision of drone strikes, won't historians indict this program as state-sanctioned terrorism?   

Whatever a president does . . .

If running top-down, private wars sum up Obama's critique of the military over-reach that elected him, then he's either a phony, a hypocrite, or lacks all memory. Do not unlegislated drone strikes evoke Nixon's heinous dictum that whatever a president does must be legal? And absent Congressional outrage by still nuttier zealots, no legal challenges will matter until long after Obama has moved on.  

Nothing driving American Pragmatism blindly elevates "whatever works," as in "whatever you can get away with," even "whatever looks good to befuddled masses."   If any more, like-minded "pragmatists" (read: ruthless neo-cons) slink into power, a valuable American philosophy, not unlike evolution that's rejected by 46% of us, will be dumped on the ash heap.

If drones gratuitously wipe out suspects listed by some warlord, why not also hunt up terrorist ghouls, gremlins, and trolls? Now we're talking hideous creatures that distill what alien, foreign and dangerous mean. If a former liberal-critic of indefensible militarism readily goes to the dark side, so far with modest electoral payoffs, the mind reels: what will the "severely conservative," hardhearted, Etch-a-Sketch Mitt Romney deliver?  

Romney certainly knows bare-knuckled "pragmatism" first hand, "what works" according to his predator drone capitalism. Does he not assail Obama for insufficient pragmatism, as well-meaning boob unable to make hard decisions? Well, Mitt now contends with a pro-active, pre-emptive unflinching warrior who tragically gets all too many missions accomplished. As millions of sacrificed Iraqis made W. a re-electable "war president," why not a neo-liberal who insists on running his own wars, executing what is, without doubt, devoutly ideological pragmatism. Whatever works, if it works. 

- Advertisement -

- Advertisement -

Next Page  1  |  2


Educated at Rutgers College (BA) and UC Berkeley (Ph.D, English) Becker left university teaching (Northwestern, U. Chicago) for business, founding and heading SOTA Industries, high end audio company from '80 to '92. From '92-02 he did marketing (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Summer in the GOP Asylum: "Who are these guys?"

Trickle-down Gulf Wreck-onomics

"Apocalypse Now' Vogue Engulfs Chicken Littles

Moses Kaput -- Rightwing Ten Commandments To Serve Looming Theocracy

"God Particle' Refudiates the Religious Right

Deadline Looms To Fund Critical Ocean Plastic-Trash Film


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 people are discussing this page, with 5 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

no Senate approval needed. Nope, the commander-in-... by Robert S. Becker on Monday, Jun 4, 2012 at 5:44:29 PM
This sets a wonderful precedent for the future pow... by Paul Repstock on Monday, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:24:35 PM
Let's not give McCain credit where it is not due. ... by Ed Dingilian on Tuesday, Jun 5, 2012 at 6:34:46 AM
of the money power national security state. No can... by intotheabyss on Tuesday, Jun 5, 2012 at 4:34:27 PM
I'm a bit surprised at the outrage.  Presiden... by Joan Kelly on Wednesday, Jun 6, 2012 at 1:37:09 PM