Tag(s): ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (11 comments)

Global Warming

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)
Page 2 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

Our dismay and bewilderment welcomes those who reject the responsibility we assign them. Scorn greets those perceived as being "in denial". Today's do-gooders are content to dismiss this considerable chunk of citizenry as conservative crackpots, and religious relics.

But, what do we see if we ask the ghost of filth past to draw us a picture of New Yorkers circa 1963? No city in America was as liberal as New York, nor as disconnected from fundamentalism. The fashion capitol of America, no city was more conscious of la mode. These were not rubes or hicks, but the avant-garde. Yet, these dapper doyens of sophistication never realized that they were as responsible for the unsanitary situation as if they had pulled down their trendy trousers and gone on the sidewalks themselves.

Just as New Yorkers couldn't hear what the do-gooding ladies of society were saying then, those today that deny they are causing global warming simply can't hear what is being said. It's a case of kill the messenger.

In today's society, so pettied by partisan perversion, the source is the message. The medium for disseminating the facts about global warming is one on which substantial segments of our society have long since pushed the "mute" button. For those of our brothers and sisters living within the "story", the Great Satan is credentialed elitism. Any argument which betrays that a stream of thought has its headwaters there is worse than useless.

To begin with, lose the term "global"; it simply reeks of foreign and internationalist conspiracies. Then, crypto-scientific jargon has to go. "Pollution" is bad enough; do you actually think anyone knows what "anthropogenic" means? Ten thousand Al Gores describing the Van Der Wals effect will not gain a single convert. Forget about "greenhouse gases" and don't mention hydroflurocarbons or perflourocarbons. These are the words of baby-faced grads fresh from the academy, speaking to the tanned and grizzled people who live on the land (Or imagine they do), and barely have time to snicker after they perceive that they are being lectured by someone that "doesn't even shave everyday". If you have something to say to these folks, you have to tell it like it is in everyday language that everyone understands.

Just tell them that they're dirty people. Tell them that they're just as piggy as New Yorkers. That's outside their "story", and will definitely get their attention.

After all, what really is the problem? In plain language it's us: We're Filthy. What is in the air is just litter, just like any other litter- even if we can't "see" it. Its trash and excrement; the same plain old garbage that has plagued our settlements since before history began.

Surely, you say, the millenniums of progress have improved the species, we have left living in our own mess behind. Those piggy dog-walkers of the twentieth century, and the Neolithic primitives they evolved from, are ancient history. Science and technology distinguish us from them and the other lower forms.

Pish! Taw! These are human attributes; they simply enhance our nature, they do not alter it. Yes, we bask in our contemporary marvels, but all our advanced capabilities have simply allowed us to elevate our collective anus and splatter Heaven. Yup, we're superior to Murphy all right.

He couldn't crap in the sky.

I like to think Murphy is very happy up there, and he is at peace now with all the other doggies(not having to protect us). He would dope out what so many of the beasts below don't. Dogs have a nose for these things. They can sniff out the mystery in the truth which we elude. Want the skinny on global warming? Crave an angle? Murphy understands the inside story that we simply refuse to see.

The invisible poop.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

shopkeeper 1976-2001

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Editor

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
11 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Your article makes a good point by G J Lau on Sunday, Oct 18, 2009 at 7:09:31 AM
We need action by Philip Pease on Sunday, Oct 18, 2009 at 10:02:16 AM
It's STILL up to us. by Richmond Shreve on Sunday, Oct 18, 2009 at 8:28:04 PM
Action against what? by Michael Lee on Sunday, Oct 18, 2009 at 12:05:26 PM
"sun causes cooling" by Clark on Sunday, Oct 18, 2009 at 3:21:23 PM
NASA - Sun causing global warming!!! by Michael Lee on Sunday, Oct 18, 2009 at 9:51:52 PM
Nonsense article..... by richard on Sunday, Oct 18, 2009 at 4:48:13 PM
Did I miss something? by Dick Thomson on Sunday, Oct 18, 2009 at 4:59:29 PM
Globble Warning by Mad Jayhawk on Sunday, Oct 18, 2009 at 5:49:22 PM
Nay Sayers by Richmond Shreve on Sunday, Oct 18, 2009 at 8:50:42 PM
31,478 scientist DENY man-made global warming!!!! by Michael Lee on Sunday, Oct 18, 2009 at 9:39:23 PM