Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   1 comment

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

George Romney for President

By       Message John Basel     Permalink
      (Page 2 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Author 7981
Become a Fan
  (6 fans)
- Advertisement -

Why the turnaround? As a businessman he has had to roll with the punches to be competitive. He has brought this ability to change and adapt to the environment to his political life.   But is this the kind of politician that voters want? Or do they want someone who is a known quantity and can be trusted to not change his mind on important issues after he is put into the White House?   The latter seems to be true.

Romney's main weakness has been his propensity to change his mind on key issues. Nobody has earned the label of flip-flopper more than Mitt Romney. Most of the above referenced issues are the kinds of issues that some call the "civil rights" issues of the day. What would his father say about Mitt turning his back on these civil rights issues.?

Where is the pressure coming from for Mitt to shift so far to the right from where he was ten and twenty years ago? In his 2008 bid for the White House he was influenced by the fact that the middle was crowded with McCain and Giuliani. There was room on the right. Now, the Tea Party is the major influence on GOP politics. It is no mistake that Mitt has chosen a Tea Party favorite for a running mate and that he has shifted his opinions based on Tea Party stances. In spite of that he is still generally considered not conservative enough for most Tea Partiers who have been labeled "extremists" by many on the left.

So you could say that while Mitt's father, George, embraced civil rights and shunned extremists Mitt has shunned civil rights and embraced extremists. But to say that Mitt has embraced Tea Party ideals is a bit of a stretch. He seems to want to straddle the fence keeping one foot on the side of centrists and trying to please all. Ask Barack Obama how that's worked out for him. Trying to please everybody usually ends up pleasing nobody.

So with Mitt, he's like a box of chocolates, you never know what you're going to get.

George Romney said this in 1964 after the GOP convention, "Dogmatic ideological parties tend to splinter the political and social fabric of a nation, lead to governmental crises and deadlocks, and stymie the compromises so often necessary." Source: The Real Romney, by Kranish & Helman, p. 25 , Jan 17, 2012  

- Advertisement -

Those words ring so true today it is amazing how prophetic George Romney was. Now that's a Romney I could vote for.

- Advertisement -

Next Page  1  |  2


A graduate of the State University of New York at Buffalo with an MBA in 1980, John went into the banking business from 1981-1991. John went into the gymnastics business with his wife, with whom he has two children, in 1992 and grew it enough by (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -
Google Content Matches:

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

What is a Socialist Anyway?

Healthcare Forum a Big Success, But Reveals Divisions

The Civil Rights Act of 2010?

Two opposing viewpoints of Obama's speech in light of the Israeli/Palestinian Conflict