Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 2/10/09:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (3 comments)

Geithner's Federal Bank of Chernobyl

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (7 fans)   -- Page 2 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

Consumers also need to change their mindset. Over the last three decades credit became a commodity. Credit is NOT a commodity, it's a financial tool. Homebuyers borrow to buy a house in their price range. Then they –  (are you sitting down for this?) they repay the loan.

And equity in a home is NOT a commodity either.  It's part of a family's estate. You don't eat it as it as fast at it appears, you bank it, and later you live off it in retirement. And, if you're heirs are lucky, you pass on what's left to the next generation as seed money so they can repeat the process. That's not only good personal financial hygiene but forms the basis of a sustainable economy.

Now, don't get me wrong,  there are government guarantees that serve a useful purpose. Deposit insurance, for example, is a good thing as it protects the modest fortunes of average folks. In fact, it should probably be increased from $100,000 to $250,000.

But federal deposit insurance (FDIC) is a risk taxpayers know about as it's an explicit government guarantee financed largely by insurance fees paid by banks themselves. But what we are learning now is that in reality taxpayers underwrite the entire private banking system in the US. Because when it goes sideways in a big way, as it has now, we end up covering their loses.

We did NOT sign up for that. There is not a single piece of legislation that designates institutions “too big to fail.” Not one word. (And by the way, “too big to fail almost also always translates into “too big to jail. I'd change that too. In fact, that would be my very first change.)

Any bank that requires significant federal assistance just to survive, should be put under federal conservatorship until such time it can be repaired and sold to the private sector, or liquidated.



Then, rather than dumping all our sand into the vaults of failed banks, we should use it to create more jobs in the privates sector. Those workers will, in turn, spend some of that money stimulating the economy and save some of that money bolstering the asset base of the remaining banks.

Holy Adam Smith, Bat Man! Is that REALLY so hard to figure out?

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Stephen Pizzo has been published everywhere from The New York Times to Mother Jones magazine. His book, Inside Job: The Looting of America's Savings and Loans, was nominated for a (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Just wait until they monetize the debt by Roger Thomas on Wednesday, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:27:44 AM
Debt slaves by Davaru on Wednesday, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:07:50 PM
simply slaves by William Whitten on Thursday, Feb 12, 2009 at 2:06:36 AM

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend


Copyright © 2002-2012, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum