Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 2 Share on Facebook 4 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 7 (13 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   15 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Dylan Ratigan: Three Ways Our Government Could Trigger the Creation of Many More Private Sector Jobs in America

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Richard Clark     Permalink
      (Page 2 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 6   Supported 5   Well Said 3  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H4 8/9/11

Author 8235
Become a Fan
  (110 fans)
- Advertisement -

Throwing trillions at the big banks is like pouring water into a bucket with a hole in it.   How so?   Because current banking laws, and for that matter trade laws, both make it more profitable for banks to:

(a)   engage in financial speculation, loan the money right back to our own government, or invest it overseas . . rather than to . .

(b)   focus on domestic lending.

In other words, before the money ever gets to domestic lending, it leaks out the hole in the bucket and ends up either overseas or in the gambling casinos of Wall Street (i.e. the markets for stocks and derivatives).

In order to "reverse the blower," therefore, we need laws that encourage banks to lend, rather than speculate and extract.   That way, money can be spread around to job creators who actually produce ideas and hire workers to produce products and services based on those creative ideas.

Finally, let us realize something that Dylan Ratigan apparently does not, and that is that even if small businesses had all the loaned investment money they needed to expand and hire new employees, they wouldn't do that unless there were sufficient numbers of consumers out there ready and able to buy the services and products of these companies.   And that's not going to happen unless a whole lot more money is put back into the hands of existent workers and consumers.   This means that a whole lot of federal financial help is going to first have to go to the following potential spenders whose then resultant spending is going to be absolutely required:

- Advertisement -

a)     State and local governments so that they can hire back, or give raises to, the state and local government employees who   they   have   either been forced to lay off or reduce the wages of

b)     The unemployed who badly need extensions of their unemployment insurance

c)     People who are on welfare and food stamps and who immediately spend into the economy every penny they receive.

- Advertisement -

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Several years after receiving my M.A. in social science (interdisciplinary studies) I was an instructor at S.F. State University for a year, but then went back to designing automated machinery, and then tech writing, in Silicon Valley. I've (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Was Pat Tillman Murdered by an American Sharpshooter to Shut Him up?

New JFK assassination bombshells

Two U.S. presidents implicated by ex-CIA black-ops assassin

The cholesterol - heart disease scam: How the medical-industrial complex is raking in billions at our expense

Four Ticking Time Bombs That Will Soon Ignite a Revolution

The Ultimate Goal of the Bankster-led Political-economic Warfare Being Waged Against Us Is . . . ?