Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   3 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

China is eating our lunch. What might we do about it?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 2 of 5 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 2   Interesting 2   Must Read 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 1/23/11

Become a Fan
  (109 fans)

Americans are proud of dreaming big and taking big chances, and as far as individual feats go, it may still be true.

But the larger truth is that, foreign military adventurism aside, the American government hasn't really acted boldly since the days of Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal and Lyndon Johnson's Great Society.   Americans talk a lot about change during elections, but they recoil from action once the election is over.     In this article from the L.A. Times, Neal Gabler provides examples:

  • An economic stimulus?   Make sure it is a small one.  
  • Health care reform?   Be happy with half measures.
  • Climate change legislation?   No action at all.

We blame politics, deficits and bad leadership, when we should be blaming our cowardice and complacency.

A bit of history

When the United States was founded, its leadership class was more or less equally divided between Federalists who believed in a vigorous national government and Republicans who emphasized decentralization.   The former looked toward shaping an expanding nation in a changing world.   The latter looked toward conserving a pastoral way of life that the changing world threatened.   Thus action and inaction, change and conservation were posited as two sides of the American enterprise.

Throughout the 19th century, during America's adolescence, the country vacillated between these poles.   The Whigs and their successors, the Republicans, were the proponents of boldness -- forming a national bank, a national university, a national rail system, a homestead act -- chiefly as a way to facilitate mercantile interests.   The Democrats, descended from Thomas Jefferson's old Republicans, remained wary, and focused more on the pastoral and agrarian life.

By the early 20th century, the roles had largely reversed, at least at the national level.   It was the Democrats, infused with energy from populism, progressivism and a general mistrust of big business, who proposed new initiatives.   The Republicans -- with the exception that proves the rule, Teddy Roosevelt -- advocated maintaining the status quo.   Eventually there emerged a governing pattern -- forward, stand pat, forward, stand pat -- with Democrats generally doing the moving forward and Republicans standing pat, immobile.

But even this overstates the case for governmental boldness.

Republicans became America's default party as early as the 1890s.   Since then, Democrats have been elected to the presidency only when Republicans screwed up:   Taft by dividing his party, Hoover with his Depression, Eisenhower with his recession, Nixon with Watergate, George H.W. Bush with his recession and George W. Bush with practically everything.  

Democrats are tapped to ride to the rescue, but this has largely been more a matter of throwing out the rascals than of empowering action.

The two 20th century exceptions have been FDR and LBJ.   The New Deal and the Great Society were bold, progressive movements, but they were achieved only as a result of disaster -- in the first case, a convulsive Depression; in the second, the assassination of JFK.

So why hasn't our great recession, another deep convulsion, created an equally effective cry for government activism?  

The need for the Democratic cavalry to clean up the Republican mess could hardly seem clearer.   And that was precisely why Barack Obama was elected:   to act boldly.   But no sooner did he enter office than the old chants of fearfulness reverberated across the country:   An economic rescue would only ratchet up the deficit;   the regulation of Wall Street would destroy Wall Street;   health care reform would result in socialism.   Or so people feared.

What happened to our resolve?   Nothing really.   Americans just reverted to form.

It's easy to blame Republicans and their long, relentless campaign asserting that any action besides cutting taxes is dangerous, and one wouldn't be entirely wrong to do so.   Rank-and-file Democrats, after all, still tell pollsters they would opt for a bolder stimulus package and more extensive health care reform.   "It's just those damn Republicans (and Bluedog Dems) who wouldn't let these two things happen."

But the Republicans' and the tea partyers' successes only underscore how much of the nation is terrified by any action whatsoever.   For better or worse, Americans are a timorous bunch who, rather sadly, only press their government to act when they think national security is at stake.   That's how Eisenhower sold the interstate highway system, how LBJ sold Vietnam and how George W. Bush sold the Iraq war.   When we aren't defending ourselves, American government just can't seem to muster a consensus to do much of anything.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
China has a national economic strategy. Why not the US?

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

Several years after receiving my M.A. in social science (interdisciplinary studies) I was an instructor at S.F. State University for a year, but then went back to designing automated machinery, and then tech writing, in Silicon Valley. I've (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

New JFK assassination bombshells

Was Pat Tillman Murdered by an American Sharpshooter to Shut Him up?

The cholesterol - heart disease scam: How the medical-industrial complex is raking in billions at our expense

Two U.S. presidents implicated by ex-CIA black-ops assassin

Four Ticking Time Bombs That Will Soon Ignite a Revolution

The Ultimate Goal of the Bankster-led Political-economic Warfare Being Waged Against Us Is . . . ?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

A recent article in the Wall Street Journal showed... by Richard Clark on Sunday, Jan 23, 2011 at 12:18:12 PM
Say what you want about the Chinese government, bu... by Bruce Morgan on Sunday, Jan 23, 2011 at 12:52:22 PM
But for the time being I keep hoping that if enoug... by Richard Clark on Sunday, Jan 23, 2011 at 1:07:20 PM