Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 5   Well Said 2   News 2   View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (52 comments)

Change for the Worse

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (260 fans)   -- Page 2 of 3 page(s)

opednews.com

In the midst of the greatest economic crisis in US history when trillions of dollars are being added to US national debt, Obama’s budget spends more on two pointless wars  than the total military spending of China and Russia combined.  Obama’s wars serve only the profits of the military/security complex and the promotion rate of military officers. The longer the wars continue, the larger the number of officers who can retire at higher ranks, thus further swelling future annual deficits and the national debt.

Moreover, as is becoming apparent, the Bush/Obama war in Afghanistan cannot be fought without fighting a war in Pakistan. 

As if this isn’t enough war, Obama parrots Dick Cheney’s charge, totally unsupported by any evidence, that Iran is making nuclear weapons.  The chances are high that the new White House Moron will have us at war in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran, and Iraq.  As Obama’s wars expand, the $205 billion for war in Iraq and Afghanistan will become $400 billion annually and then $600 billion annually. 

Obama’s “troop withdrawal” from Iraq has proved to be just another con job.  Obama has announced that the withdrawal doesn’t include the 50,000 US soldiers who will remain in Iraq indefinitely--like the US troops that have been kept in Japan and Germany for 64 years and in Korea since the early 1950s. 

Health Care

Meanwhile Medicare is on the ropes. The latest Medicare trustees report says that Medicare’s funds for hospital payments will be exhausted in 10 years.  To make ends meet, Obama proposes cutting payments to Medicare providers.

Obama’s plan is to make doctors and patients pay for Medicare. One way to get National Health is to make it uneconomic for private health care to service Medicare patients. Already many doctors will not accept Medicare patients because of the low payments, endless paperwork, and risk of prosecution for “over-billing.”  Looking at one recent Medicare patient medical bill, Medicare and supplemental insurance paid 29 percent of the billed amount, requiring the doctor to eat 58.5 percent of his charges and the patient to pay 12.5 percent.  The doctor was paid $93.16 on a $320.89 bill.  And Obama wants to reduce payments to providers?

What is Obama thinking? A country that can’t afford Medicare can’t afford National Health. Medicare provides only for the elderly, and it provides very little.  A person pays the Medicare tax as long as he earns and on the totality of earnings.  For the rich the Medicare tax can exceed the cost of a gold-plated private insurance policy. 

Basic Medicare leaves a person unprotected.  To provide better coverage, it is necessary to enroll in Medicare Part B for which the premium is $308.30 per month or $3,699.60 per year.  On top of this, a person needs a privately supplied supplemental policy to complete Medicare coverage.  AARP’s policy, which, after deductibles are met, covers half of drug costs, cost the “Medicare protected” elderly  $273.50 per month or $3,282 per year.  The drug prescription plan passed by Congress costs the individual yet more.

The two supplements to Medicare cost the Medicare patient $6,981.60 per year. In addition, if the Medicare patient has much retirement income besides Social Security, he pays income tax on 85% of the $3,699.60 Medicare Part B premium as it is part of taxable Social Security, which for someone in the 25% bracket is another $925 dollars.

In the late 1970s, Democratic Senator Russell Long, Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, told me that as Social Security was collected as a tax on wages and salaries, the US government had promised never to tax the benefits.  So much for any commitment that the US government makes to the American people.

A top Social Security income, net of Medicare Part B premium, is $23,220 per year. Deduct the AARP policy, and the elderly who have paid in maximum Social Security taxes, get $20,000 per year.  Of course, few Social Security retirees receive the maximum payment.  AARP’s Public Policy Institute reports that in 2006 the average annual Social Security benefit for a retired worker was $12,372.  Such a worker would have little left after paying the Medicare Part B premium and an additional premium for a supplement.

Offshoring and “free trade” have destroyed employer-provided health coverage for millions of employees.  Private health care coverage can cost as much as one-third and even one-half of a person’s earned income, and some people are not insurable.  National Health seems to be in the cards--only there is no money for it.  All the money is being spent in pointless wars and on bailouts of financial fraud.  The Obama budget puts bankster bailouts and pointless wars ahead of the health of the American people.

National Health advocates emphasize that a single-payer system is less expensive because it eliminates layers of profits.  It is also less expensive for a less promising reason.  Unless there is a parallel private health care system, National Health systems limit health spending to what is provided in the government budget.  Over time, health care has to compete with everything else in the budget. Every part of the budget has its partisans and special interests.  It is fantasy to assume that National Health will always be well funded.  Just look at the state of the National Health Service in the UK.

Who’s Rich?

Obama’s plan to tax the rich is another con job.  Obama’s budget defines the rich as a person with a $250,000 before tax income.  This is a rotten joke.  The rich are the banksters, such as Hank Paulson with his $160 million annual bonus, and heads of hedge funds with their $1,000 million annual incomes.  To confuse the struggling middle class with the real rich is criminal.  A person with a $250,000 income before tax does not come close to being rich.  Obama’s “tax the rich” scheme will devastate the upper middle class and leave the super rich undamaged.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/

Paul Craig Roberts was an editor of the Wall Street Journal and an Assistant Secretary of the U.S. Treasury. His latest book, HOW THE ECONOMY WAS LOST, has just been published by CounterPunch/AK Press. He was awarded the Treasury Department's (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
52 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

yes, yes, yes by Rady Ananda on Sunday, Mar 1, 2009 at 9:19:01 PM
Bananas are good fruit by Allan Wayne on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 12:20:40 AM
Inflation is a tax on everyone ... by Mr M on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 6:05:28 AM
What's your definition of "Government" by GLloyd Rowsey on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 8:11:21 AM
One that we started with was as good as one we could have by Mr M on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 11:22:02 AM
The very first "real change" by joe r on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 1:56:41 PM
Read Barrington Moore, Jr. my friend. by GLloyd Rowsey on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 4:34:47 PM
Some were, some weren't ... by Mr M on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 8:21:30 PM
It's true what you say, Mr. M, but is it enough? by GLloyd Rowsey on Wednesday, Mar 4, 2009 at 7:40:29 AM
THEY HAD IT RIGHT by MARGARET BASET on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 2:59:21 PM
That's a wonderful quotation, M. Basset. by GLloyd Rowsey on Wednesday, Mar 4, 2009 at 7:46:34 AM
thanks for the thoughtful reply, Mr. M. by GLloyd Rowsey on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 4:09:00 PM
Thank you for your suggestion ... by Mr M on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 9:07:32 PM
What middle class? by Nick van Nes on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 9:52:33 AM
more like 500 billionaires in the US by Rady Ananda on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 10:31:06 AM
Whistling Through the Graveyard of Liberty by Jason Paz on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 12:46:14 AM
powerful arguments by Elizabeth Molchany on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:34:21 AM
YELLING "FIRE!" by William Whitten on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 4:01:49 PM
point taken by Rady Ananda on Tuesday, Mar 3, 2009 at 12:34:47 PM
"President Obama has presented the most irresponsible budget by Daniel Geery on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 6:19:52 AM
time is needed by Rady Ananda on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 2:34:52 PM
Two years Rady? by Mr M on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 9:30:01 PM
Bill Maher, Gavin Newsome & PJ O'Rourke like Obama by Rady Ananda on Tuesday, Mar 3, 2009 at 2:55:46 PM
THERE PLAN IS WORKING by MARGARET BASET on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 6:45:23 AM
CHANGE FOR THE WORSE by MARGARET BASET on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 7:14:08 AM
Is this article supposed to make us by GLloyd Rowsey on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 8:13:34 AM
about voting period by Rady Ananda on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 10:41:45 AM
See MY by GLloyd Rowsey on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 4:14:23 PM
my reading list exceeds my life span by Rady Ananda on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 6:32:47 PM
I read in it 30 years ago, by GLloyd Rowsey on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 7:19:33 PM
Whats Next? by Deborah Bradley on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 9:31:31 AM
I refer you to the articles by richard on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 11:15:16 AM
Despite some unfair comparisons, a generally accurate view. by Richard Mynick on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 11:52:14 AM
PCR is right on by jersey girl on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 12:27:24 PM
A very salient point there JG by CasaZaza on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 1:50:54 PM
Some change, CZ by joe r on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 2:07:25 PM
First they ignore you ... by Mr M on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 2:49:41 PM
ya Mr. M., the question is how by richard on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:12:14 PM
It's a race Richard, between how many become aware, and ... by Mr M on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 4:32:24 PM
CRISIS CIRCUS by William Whitten on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:55:32 PM
yes WW by jersey girl on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 4:17:51 PM
Rockefeller by William Whitten on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 5:10:20 PM
lol.. thanks WW by jersey girl on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 6:32:26 PM
Hey Wait! There's Something Else to Consider! by Marty Didier on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 4:24:58 PM
yes Marty.. I've seen your post before by jersey girl on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 4:46:25 PM
Thanks for the response. by Marty Didier on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 5:17:37 PM
Woh by William Whitten on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 5:44:26 PM
actually WW by jersey girl on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 6:26:17 PM
Marty by jersey girl on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 6:27:31 PM
My Life has been a Living Nightmare! by Marty Didier on Tuesday, Mar 3, 2009 at 4:42:11 PM
Jersey by William Whitten on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 5:18:45 PM
Another Roberts "Barn Burner" by Michael Collins on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 10:37:53 PM