Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ;  (less...)
Add to My Group
September 25, 2008 at 11:49:30

Must Read 10   Well Said 8   Valuable 7   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H2) on 9/25/08:

Credit Default Swaps: The Insane Problem and the Radical but Sane Solution

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg
Tell A Friend

By Chuck Simpson (about the author)     Page 2 of 5 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

But in today's society, fire is not the only disaster that can be insured against. Of particular interest, default on a home mortgage can be insured against. And possession of an interest in the mortgage or actual risk of financial loss as a result of default is not required in order to purchase the insurance.

In this case also, I can increase my return with an inflated appraisal and decrease my investment by declaring the risk to be minuscule - meaning rated AAA by widely acclaimed rating agencies.

We can now change another assumption. Assume the playing with matches problem is removed and a new problem is substituted. A problem like the husband and wife both having low-paying jobs and no health insurance, coupled with knowledge that many employers refuse to accept illness as a legitimate reason for missing work and have iron-clad policies that require ill workers be fired for failing to report to work.

Or assume both husband and wife have no seniority and work at jobs that may not exist tomorrow because they were shipped overseas last night.

If I knew one or both of them were developing health problems or that one or both were at risk of being laid off, I would see a reasonably good shot at "winning the disaster lottery" so to speak, by buying mortgage default insurance, also known as a credit default swap, on their $400,000 house.

Then I could sit back, relax and wait for the hoped-for and expected misfortune, which will be my good fortune. As could 99 of my gambling buddies.

Back to the neighbor's home that mysteriously burned to the ground. This tragic event is a great deal for me and my 99 gambling buddies. Our biggest risk is that, having paid the insurance premiums, the home stubbornly refuses to burn to the ground.

Being capitalists, we desire to increase the odds that a disastrous fire will occur. My friends and I with fire insurance policies on my neighbor's house have two options for increasing the odds. One, teach the young child the joys and wonders of paying with matches in closets. Two, hire a professional arsonist.

Holders of credit default swaps have similar but more numerous and less risky opportunities to increase their odds of "winning the disaster lottery".

The best way would be use of fine-print, non-understandable escalator clauses that increase the hard-working couple's monthly payments by a factor of two or three. With rampant inflation, confined to core goods that officially "don't count" in Washington, such as $4.00 gasoline, $5.00 milk and $3.00 bread. With rampant if covert support of immigrant labor, legal or otherwise, who are willing to work for less, without any benefits at all, let alone health insurance, thereby increasing the risk of job loss.

We could destroy OSHA, making on-the-job causes of illness and injury more likely. We could buy legislation that benefits pharmaceutical companies while making both medicine and health insurance unaffordable. We could destroy the economy of Main Street, making job loss more likely. The list is extensive, collectively making early default all but inevitable.

That issue addressed, our biggest worry becomes the solvency of the insurance companies. That problem can best be solved by requiring substitution of a "bigger and better" insurance company with deeper pockets.

Purchasing legislation and regulations (or the lack thereof) is the preferred method.

Roughly a quarter-century ago, when I was owner of a new and small consulting engineering firm in a Midwestern state, a law was passed requiring that operators of coal strip mines reclaim the messes they made. To ensure this might actually happen, the new law required coal mine operators to post reclamation performance bonds, payable to the state. So if the operators went bankrupt, the state could call the bonds, thereby obtaining funds for the state to hire and pay remediation contractors.

I never understood at the time why the small independent strip mine operators had so little interest in hiring a consulting engineer to design mining and reclamation operations so as to minimize reclamation expense, or even to provide honest estimates of expected reclamation expenses. Until, in an unguarded moment, one small operator explained Plan B.

At the time, only $250,000 in financial assets were required for formation of an insurance company, and once formed, no limits were placed on the value of insurance written. Same for performance bonds written to the government that granted the license and regulated.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
SOLVING THE CREDIT DEFAULT SWAP PROBLEM

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

The author is a retired professional civil and structural engineer, reformed attorney, fierce Progressive, policy junkie, vociferous reader, lifelong learner, aspiring writer and author of the crime-thriller "The Geronimo Manifesto". He is also a (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "America Bailout Credit Crisis"

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
16 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

banksters in jail yet? by Kent Welton on Thursday, Sep 25, 2008 at 12:39:58 PM
No, but they should be along with the "regulators" and by Mark Adams on Saturday, Sep 27, 2008 at 3:40:11 PM
The other NECESSARY step to take.... by Mark E. Smith on Thursday, Sep 25, 2008 at 4:01:30 PM
Mark's Comment by Chuck Simpson on Thursday, Sep 25, 2008 at 4:16:43 PM
Please do the research, Chuck. by Mark E. Smith on Thursday, Sep 25, 2008 at 7:35:59 PM
Non-Voting by Chuck Simpson on Thursday, Sep 25, 2008 at 9:01:52 PM
Don't candy coat it... by Matthew Peters on Thursday, Sep 25, 2008 at 10:09:19 PM
Outstanding Article by pft on Thursday, Sep 25, 2008 at 6:42:50 PM
I have been by jeff prager on Thursday, Sep 25, 2008 at 8:04:20 PM
Credit Default Swaps by Jean Braun on Thursday, Sep 25, 2008 at 11:13:19 PM
Jean, before Bush appointees.... by Mark E. Smith on Friday, Sep 26, 2008 at 3:10:46 AM
EVERYONE MAJOR ELERT by Mr M on Friday, Sep 26, 2008 at 7:28:14 AM
Excellent article by Bernard on Friday, Sep 26, 2008 at 8:51:17 AM
An Early Example by Chuck Simpson on Friday, Sep 26, 2008 at 9:14:31 AM
Via E-mail by Chuck Simpson on Friday, Sep 26, 2008 at 12:10:54 PM
Innovation so-called by kei kei on Tuesday, Sep 30, 2008 at 10:01:23 PM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum