Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ;  (less...)
Add to My Group
August 16, 2008 at 11:17:44

View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H2) on 8/16/08:

Breaking: Conyers Calls Committee Back from Summer Recess to Investigate Suskind Allegations

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg
Tell A Friend

By Ralph Lopez (about the author)     Page 2 of 3 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

There is nothing partisan about impeachment. Just as politics should stop at the water's edge (except for John McCain, who injected himself into the Georgia crisis in a manner which would have earned Obama a withering barrage,) it stops when the very process by which we govern ourselves is in peril.

This is why someone like Bruce Fein, a former Reagan deputy attorney general who "trashed the Roe v. Wade abortion decision, stating that it required a "hallucinogenic intellectual flight" on the part of Justice Harry Blackmun to draft the opinion," according to CommonDreams.org, has come out as one of the most effective spokemen for a Bush impeachment. Why? CommonDreams goes on:
This is what did it: The disclosure that the National Security Agency (NSA) is engaged in the domestic wiretapping of American citizens in the United States without first obtaining warrants. The Bush Administration had crossed the line. Within twenty-four hours, Fein went into constitutional combat mode. And he hasn't stopped since.

For Fein, there is nothing really to debate; the law is settled. In 1978, Congress passed the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, or FISA, permitting the government to conduct electronic surveillance on citizens in the United States if it first gets a warrant from the FISA court, which exists for that reason only. The FISA court rarely has denied such a request.
Fein says:
"The President could pick and choose which statutes to obey in gathering foreign intelligence and employing battlefield tactics on the sidewalks of the United States."



Please do three things:



1) Call Judiciary Committee members, give a message saying we know the difference between a show, and impeachment. This is fast.

2) Participate in the campaign to reach Judiciary members' campaign contributors, to ask them as one citizen to another to withhold contributions until the member does this clearest of patriotic duties. Why this route? Because congressmen have shown themselves to be impervious to any amount of constituent pressure. Rep. John Olver (D-MA) even said, at a town meeting "Spare me, I know full well the overwhelming majority of my constituency is in favor of impeachment" as he told the packed room he would not co-sponsor any resolutions against either Bush or Cheney. We used to think that representatives were there to represent us. We have learned better. But we're not done with them.

3) Start now to prevail on the media to cover important hearings when they happen. Participate in the advertiser boycott.

There will be naysayers, and the Pelosians who seems to think that a super-majority of Pelosians is the answer. These are the same people who betrayed Americans by failing to stop the Iraq War, when they were given a majority to do just that. Better the Pelosians understand that doing their duty to impeach will be seen as a down-payment on regaining the trust of the rank-and-file, and the American people. Otherwise all promises are empty. Any national healthcare will be written by big pharma and the insurance companies. Presidents will continue to get their blank checks for war. As for the naysayers on impeachment, as the saying goes, either lead, follow, or get out of the way.

From Impeachment Left to Right

Thanks to MediaMatters.org for the following.  Each one of these statements has been debunked:

  * From Bush's September 28, 2002, radio address to the nation:

      The danger to our country is grave and it is growing. The Iraqi regime possesses biological and chemical weapons, is rebuilding the facilities to make more and, according to the British government, could launch a biological or chemical attack in as little as 45 minutes after the order is given. The regime has long-standing and continuing ties to terrorist groups, and there are Al Qaeda terrorists inside Iraq. This regime is seeking a nuclear bomb, and with fissile material could build one within a year.

  * From Bush's October 7, 2002, speech:

      We know that Iraq and Al Qaeda have had high-level contacts that go back a decade.

  * From Bush's January 28, 2003, State of the Union address:

      Evidence from intelligence sources, secret communications, and statements by people now in custody reveal that Saddam Hussein aids and protects terrorists, including members of Al Qaeda.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
impeach bush

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

http://ralphlopezworld.com

Ralph is the author of a new book "Truth in the Age of Bushism."

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "Bush Reasons To"
Inside the Mind of George W. Bush: 119 Reasons to Vote Barack Obama in 2008
by Molasses Jones

$19.99

Number of pages: 244
Publisher: BookSurge Publishing

50 Reasons Not to Vote for Bush
by Robert Sterling

$3.95

Number of pages: 201
Publisher: Robert Sterling/Feral House

50 Reasons Not to Vote for Bush
by Robert Sterling

$9.95
Lowest New Price $2.41

Number of pages: 201
Publisher: Feral House

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
23 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

Good news by Rob Kall on Saturday, Aug 16, 2008 at 12:46:01 PM
I would LOVE to see something come of this - but - by Mr M on Saturday, Aug 16, 2008 at 2:17:29 PM
Well Said, Well-Stocked.... by muservin on Tuesday, Aug 19, 2008 at 4:16:56 AM
Thanks, Ralph by Margaret Bassett on Saturday, Aug 16, 2008 at 3:27:37 PM
I wouldn't want to hang by Jim Freeman on Saturday, Aug 16, 2008 at 3:47:14 PM
Zzzzzzzzz - How many times have we been through this? by Phred42 on Saturday, Aug 16, 2008 at 4:40:06 PM
http://www.djrserv.com/images/penutsfootball.gif by Phred42 on Saturday, Aug 16, 2008 at 4:41:10 PM
Kucinich still making sense .. common sense by Victoria on Saturday, Aug 16, 2008 at 5:01:51 PM
It's one more step but HOPE needs a shove by sometimes blinded on Saturday, Aug 16, 2008 at 6:45:34 PM
Is the House Speaker above the law? by Aurora on Saturday, Aug 16, 2008 at 6:47:58 PM
Not So Fast by Robert Arend on Saturday, Aug 16, 2008 at 7:59:15 PM
OOPs by Robert Arend on Saturday, Aug 16, 2008 at 8:06:38 PM
One More Time! by Robert Arend on Saturday, Aug 16, 2008 at 8:12:06 PM
If it's Conyers, it is just going through the motions! by Hayesml47 on Saturday, Aug 16, 2008 at 9:03:49 PM
Amen to that! by Raphael Sidelman on Saturday, Aug 16, 2008 at 11:43:51 PM
Hope leaps skyhigh. Memory says Conyers fooled us once by meremark on Sunday, Aug 17, 2008 at 11:49:21 AM
Suskind Interview on Democracy Now by Daniel Latrimurti on Sunday, Aug 17, 2008 at 12:00:01 PM
thanks by Ralph Lopez on Monday, Aug 18, 2008 at 2:25:44 PM
Add one big tactic to your calls and emails by alan k on Sunday, Aug 17, 2008 at 1:15:25 PM
Nancy and Conyers are Aiding and Abetting by ronheri on Sunday, Aug 17, 2008 at 9:58:19 PM
It sounds hopeful by Sleeper on Wednesday, Aug 20, 2008 at 1:50:54 PM
It sounds hopeful by Sleeper on Wednesday, Aug 20, 2008 at 1:52:35 PM
Conyers: Before and After by Warren Pease on Wednesday, Aug 20, 2008 at 3:31:29 PM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum