![]() |
4
4
1
View Ratings |
Rate It
By Martha Rosenberg (about the author) Page 2 of 2 page(s)
Of course, the court testimony from Iowa veterinarian Paul Armbrecht that acquitted Wiles--that hanging was an acceptable method of euthanasia-- also made no sense. Aren't veterinarians sworn to alleviate animal suffering?
Nor did the $10,000 the Ohio Pork Producers Council donated to the Wiles' legal defense make sense in light of the National Pork Producers Council statement that the HBO's documentary "shows practices at a hog farm that are not condoned and, in fact, are abhorred by responsible pork producers." Make up your mind folks.
But most confusing is why agribusiness, the press and the eating public continue to view factory farm animal abuse as isolated instead of endemic and definitional.
And how the latter day "hanging judge" could view a sow suspended from a front loader and not see cruelty.
1 | 2
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Contact Author |
Contact Editor |
View Authors' Articles |
| 6 comments |
Want to post your own comment on this Article?
|
||||
Tell a Friend:
|
Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews |