Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ;  (less...)
Add to My Group
August 18, 2008 at 22:50:08

View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H2) on 8/18/08:

Are you ready for nuclear war?

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By Paul Craig Roberts (about the author)     Page 2 of 3 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

Today, Reagan is gone. The Republican Establishment is gone. There are no conservative power centers, only neoconservative power centers closely allied with Israel, which uses the billions of dollars funneled into Israeli coffers by US taxpayers to influence US elections and foreign policy.

The Republican candidate for president is a warmonger. There are no checks remaining in the Republican Party on the neocons' proclivity for war.

What Republican constituencies oppose war? Can anyone name one?

The Democrats are not much better, but they have some constituencies that are not enamored of war in order to establish US world hegemony. The Rapture Evangelicals, who fervently desire Armageddon, are not Democrats; nor are the brainwashed Brownshirts desperate to vent their frustrations by striking at someone, somewhere, anywhere.


I get emails from these Brownshirts and attest that their hate-filled ignorance is extraordinary. They are all Republicans, and yet they think they are conservatives. They have no idea who I am, but since I criticize the Bush Regime and America's belligerent foreign policy, they think I am a "liberal commie pinko."

The only literate sentence this legion of imbeciles has ever managed is: "If you hate America so much, why don't you move to Cuba!"

Such is the current state of a Reagan political appointee in today's Republican Party. He is a "liberal commie pinko" who should move to Cuba.

The Republicans will get us into more wars. Indeed, they live for war. McCain is preaching war for 100 years. For these warmongers, it is like cheering for your home team. Win at all costs. They get a vicarious pleasure out of war. If the US has to tell lies in order to attack countries, what's wrong with that? "If we don't kill them over there, they
will kill us over here."

The mindlessness is total.

Nothing real issues from the American media. The media is about demonizing Russia and Iran, about the vice presidential choices as if it matters, about whether Obama being on vacation let McCain score too many points.

The mindlessness of the news reflects the mindlessness of the government, for which it is a spokesperson.

The American media does not serve American democracy or American interests. It serves the few people who exercise power.

When the Soviet Union collapsed, the US and Israel made a run at controlling Russia and the former constituent parts of its empire. For awhile the US and Israel succeeded, but Putin put a stop to it.

Recognizing that the US had no intention of keeping any of the agreements it had made with Gorbachev, Putin directed the Russian military budget to upgrade the Russian nuclear deterrent. Consequently, the Russian army and
air force lack the smart weapons and electronics of the US military.

When the Russian army went into Georgia to rescue the Russians in South Ossetia from the destruction being inflicted upon them by the American puppet Saakashvili, the Russians made it clear that if they were opposed by American troops with smart weapons, they would deal with the threat with tactical nuclear weapons.

The Americans were the first to announce preemptive nuclear attack as their permissible war doctrine. Now the Russians have announced the tactical use of nuclear weapons as their response to American smart weapons.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

Paul Craig Roberts, a former Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury and former associate editor of the Wall Street Journal, has held numerous academic appointments. He has been reporting shocking cases of prosecutorial abuse for two decades. A new (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "Danger"
In Danger's Path: Corps 08
by W. E. B. Griffin

$7.99
Lowest New Price $2.49

Number of pages: 736
Publisher: Jove

Leadership on the Line: Staying Alive Through the Dangers of Leading
by Martin Linsky

$32.95
Lowest New Price $15.00

Number of pages: 252
Publisher: Harvard Business Press

Purity and Danger: An Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo (Routledge Classics)
by Mary Douglas

$19.95
Lowest New Price $11.99

Number of pages: 272
Publisher: TAYLOR

Clear and Present Danger (Jack Ryan)
by Tom Clancy

$7.99
Lowest New Price $2.57

Number of pages: 704
Publisher: Berkley

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
36 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

Indeed, the mindlesslessness of the right wing hoi polloi .. by Jay Foster on Monday, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:51:44 PM
The logical thing is for Russia to strike first. by Harold Smith on Tuesday, Aug 19, 2008 at 12:22:12 AM
Grim but accurate by francine on Tuesday, Aug 19, 2008 at 5:43:44 AM
Ready to be nuked? by Sandy Sand on Tuesday, Aug 19, 2008 at 8:16:00 AM
Ready for nuclear war? by paul roberts on Tuesday, Aug 19, 2008 at 8:55:15 AM
That about says it by Ivan Hentschel on Tuesday, Aug 19, 2008 at 10:28:18 AM
Who Wants to Suffer 1,000,000 Years in Hell? by Jason Paz on Tuesday, Aug 19, 2008 at 12:22:50 PM
WOW! by Levon on Tuesday, Aug 19, 2008 at 12:44:31 PM
Russia is arming their ships with nuclear warheads by CB Brooklyn on Tuesday, Aug 19, 2008 at 1:08:32 PM
War by Willy on Tuesday, Aug 19, 2008 at 2:50:28 PM
Why are the non-Bushies gutless wonders? by Donald MacKay on Tuesday, Aug 19, 2008 at 3:56:36 PM
I had wondered about that. by ScarySquirrel on Wednesday, Aug 20, 2008 at 2:34:18 AM
Nuclear War by jnaday on Tuesday, Aug 19, 2008 at 4:14:53 PM
Russia is getting ready by Mad Jayhawk on Tuesday, Aug 19, 2008 at 5:17:44 PM
You are putting forth a very good reason by Oh on Tuesday, Aug 19, 2008 at 8:33:50 PM
Is this satire? by waldopaper on Tuesday, Aug 19, 2008 at 10:14:16 PM
Squawking Jay! by Bia Winter on Wednesday, Aug 20, 2008 at 8:28:07 AM
Stupidity. by C.Bid on Wednesday, Aug 20, 2008 at 9:10:29 AM
Are you kidding? by John Lorenz on Saturday, Aug 23, 2008 at 12:47:53 AM
Military Power by don bybee on Friday, Aug 29, 2008 at 6:56:35 PM
preperation by robert braunstein on Tuesday, Aug 19, 2008 at 6:31:47 PM
Thank you, Mr. Roberts by Oh on Tuesday, Aug 19, 2008 at 9:14:40 PM
Are you ready for a nuclear war. by vincent passiatore on Wednesday, Aug 20, 2008 at 12:17:12 AM
Yes by ScarySquirrel on Wednesday, Aug 20, 2008 at 2:31:56 AM
Mix Of Punditry by arlen custer on Wednesday, Aug 20, 2008 at 8:19:23 AM
Custer? by Bia Winter on Wednesday, Aug 20, 2008 at 8:31:08 AM
The End Isn't Pretty But Necessary for the Good of Earth by arlen custer on Wednesday, Aug 20, 2008 at 11:27:24 AM
Is there an alternative? by Mark E. Smith on Thursday, Aug 21, 2008 at 2:10:09 AM
Nuclear War by don bybee on Thursday, Aug 21, 2008 at 3:10:25 PM
Hey... by C.Bid on Thursday, Aug 21, 2008 at 6:01:03 PM
Go back to sleep by don bybee on Thursday, Aug 21, 2008 at 6:30:38 PM
God Is Clearly A Sadist by arlen custer on Friday, Aug 22, 2008 at 7:26:43 AM
True by cookie monster on Friday, Aug 22, 2008 at 4:06:04 PM
Sorry your god is dead... by don bybee on Friday, Aug 29, 2008 at 6:40:01 PM
Nuclear war could be a real scenario for them. by nightgaunt on Saturday, Aug 23, 2008 at 2:16:52 PM
To Vote Or Not To Vote by Loren James on Sunday, Aug 24, 2008 at 1:02:35 AM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum