Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
January 6, 2009 at 01:33:30

Must Read 9   Well Said 5   Valuable 5   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 1/6/09:

Ad Hominem Attacks

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By Rady Ananda (about the author)     Page 2 of 3 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

San Jose State University characterizes the most frequent ad hominem appeals as attacks on:

  • personality, traits, or identity:
    • "Are you going to agree with what that racist pig is saying?"
    • "Of course she's in favor of affirmative action. What do you expect from a black woman?
  • affiliation, profession, or situation:
    • "What's the point of asking students whether they support raising tuition? They're always against any increase."
    • "Oh yeah, prison reform sounds great--until you realize that the man proposing it is himself an ex-con."
  • inconsistent actions, statements, or beliefs:
    • "How can you follow a doctor's advice if she doesn't follow it herself?"
    • "Sure, he says that today, but yesterday he said just the opposite."
  • source or association for ideas or support:
    • "Don't vote for that new initiative--it was written by the insurance lobby!"
    • "You can't possibly accept the findings of that study on smoking--it was paid for by the tobacco industry."

"The point is that each argument must be evaluated in its own right.  Information or suspicions about vested interests, hidden agendas, predilections, or prejudices should, at most, make you more vigilant in your scrutiny of that argument--but they should not be allowed to influence its evaluation.  

"Only in the case of opinions, expert and otherwise, where you must rely not on the argument or evidence being presented but on the judgment of someone else, may personal or background information be used to evaluate the ideas expressed.

"If, for example, a used car vendor tries to prove to you that the car in question is being offered at lower than the average or 'blue book' price, you must ignore the fact that the vendor will profit from the sale, and evaluate the proof. If, on the other hand, that used car vendor says, 'Trust me, this is a good deal,' without further proofs or arguments, you are entitled to take into account the profit motive, the shady reputation of the profession, and anything else you deem to be relevant as a condition of 'trust.'" 9  

OpEdNews is filled with people of great intelligence and creativity.  The tough thing for those with a brain (or any talent, really) is to recognize how incredibly hurtful we can be when we show impatience with others who aren't as smart or talented, or who simply don't think the way we do.  All of us have different worldviews.

We need to think and write critically.  We need to use diplomacy, tact and grace.  Keep our judgments about other people's ideas off the table.  Stick to the facts and conclusions.  Debate the facts and/or conclusions.  Keep our emotions out of it.  

We're not sitting around in some bar or in our private homes having these discussions.  We're writing this stuff in public, on a popular website that gets over 700,000 unique visitors a month.  We are diplomats of progressive ideals and Leftist thought.  We have to act accordingly.     



1 Glen Whitman. Logical Fallacies and the Art of Debate. California State University Northridge, 2001.

3 Richard Nordquist, ad hominem.

4 N.S. Gill, Ad Hominem.

5 T. Edward Damer, Attacking Faulty Reasoning, 4th ed., Wadsworth, 2001, as cited by Richard Nordquist, ibid.

6 Whitman, ibid.

7 mathew, ibid.

8 mathew, ibid.

9 San Jose State University, Mission: Critical. 

 

Also see Ad Hominem Fallacies of Relevance.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

In 2004, Rady Ananda joined the growing community of (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "Community Creativity"
Community, Economic Creativity, and Organization

$45.00
Lowest New Price $24.94

Number of pages: 320
Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA

Artists Communities: A Directory of Residencies that Offer time and Space for Creativity (Artists Communities: A Directory of Residences That Offer Time
by Alliance of Artists' Communities

$24.95
Lowest New Price $13.47

Number of pages: 336
Publisher: Allworth Press

Coming Home: Community, Creativity and Consciousness
by Cheryl Charles

$22.95
Lowest New Price $1.49

Number of pages: 250
Publisher: Personhood Press

Convergence: Integrating your Career, Community, Creativity and Calling
by Brett Johnson

$19.95

Number of pages: 299
Publisher: Indaba Publishing

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
156 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

Sad that so many need to hear this by editnetwork on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 4:56:33 AM
it's a daily phenom by Rady Ananda on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 7:51:17 AM
Historic Record by William White on Wednesday, Jan 7, 2009 at 8:04:17 AM
thanks for the heads up by Rady Ananda on Wednesday, Jan 7, 2009 at 12:29:45 PM
Be Aware Of This, However.... by Richard Volaar on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 6:33:57 AM
you're on the right target by Rady Ananda on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 7:55:01 AM
I wish it were possible to make this a conservative by Linn Cohen-Cole on Thursday, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:18:08 PM
enlightening article on kindness & compassion by Rady Ananda on Saturday, Jan 10, 2009 at 12:54:46 AM
thanks for the reminder Rady by jersey girl on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 7:00:38 AM
good suggestion, Jersey Girl by Rady Ananda on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 8:03:01 AM
Curious by Anthony Wade on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 3:49:08 PM
I don't know why I should listen to some women with short .. by Mr M on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 7:18:30 AM
thanks for your help, Mr M by Rady Ananda on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 7:58:49 AM
you'll be missed ... by Mr M on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 8:50:02 AM
i always thought by Meryl Ann Butler on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 3:57:37 PM
meryl by jersey girl on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 4:35:41 PM
whatever it is by Meryl Ann Butler on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 5:36:35 PM
don't be silly ... by Mr M on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 5:04:09 PM
you and your iron-clad scientific reasoning... by Meryl Ann Butler on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 5:35:59 PM
you're all so silly by Rady Ananda on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 6:01:13 PM
Mice don't live as long as five years. by Brett Paatsch on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 6:59:30 PM
lovely by Meryl Ann Butler on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 8:09:25 PM
Where'd You Get Your Nails Done?? by Richard Volaar on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 8:25:29 PM
ROFLMAO by Rady Ananda on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 8:45:15 PM
Well at least your ears are still the same ... by Mr M on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 9:36:12 PM
hee by Jennifer Hathaway on Wednesday, Jan 7, 2009 at 12:25:33 PM
thanx Rady by Suzana Megles on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 8:30:05 AM
you have a gift for writing, Suzana by Rady Ananda on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 10:15:57 AM
Sincere beliefs by Darren Wolfe on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 8:36:28 AM
spooks, goons and guerrillas by Rady Ananda on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:21:52 AM
EXCUSE ME by WML on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 2:06:55 PM
YOU'RE EXCUSED by Darren Wolfe on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 8:52:49 PM
The new debating paradign by Steve Windisch (jibbguy) on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 8:45:09 AM
excellent; points well taken by Rady Ananda on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 10:35:06 AM
I agree by Steven Leser on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 8:55:42 AM
interesting ideas by Rady Ananda on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 1:37:35 PM
Great Post by James Hadstate on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 9:09:54 AM
from a veteran-contributor by Mark Sashine on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 9:19:59 AM
Mark, I may agree with your remark about the "clintonians" by jersey girl on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 10:00:37 AM
Mea culpa by Mark Sashine on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 10:07:20 AM
thanks for clearing that up mark :) by jersey girl on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 10:21:12 AM
cereal rapists? by Rob Kall on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 2:29:54 PM
REALLY? by Paula Sayles on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 4:01:54 PM
Just the tip of the rhetorical iceberg by Jim Eldon on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 9:30:23 AM
thanks for the book recommendation by Rady Ananda on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:09:19 AM
You can read my diary entry by Mark Sashine on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 10:00:57 AM
I like Cheerios ... by Mr M on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 3:00:00 PM
Opednews relies on unpaid editors which are not all equally by Brett Paatsch on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 10:16:59 AM
Interesting, I exercise editorial powers so rarely... by Steven Leser on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 4:05:14 PM
I have to agree with you ... doh! by Paul Rye on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 7:19:16 PM
Interesting Observation by Paula Sayles on Wednesday, Jan 7, 2009 at 7:58:38 AM
Baloney Detector by DC Rapier on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 10:40:34 AM
another good link(s) by Rady Ananda on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 12:33:46 PM
the umbrella is too wide by Mikhail Lyubansky on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 10:50:15 AM
I disagree... by Steven Leser on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 5:14:14 PM
The messenger is part of the message by Mikhail Lyubansky on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 8:27:08 PM
Give this idea some more thought, Mikhail by Rady Ananda on Wednesday, Jan 7, 2009 at 6:36:58 AM
umbrella is logically as wide as it needs to be by Rady Ananda on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 8:06:51 PM
no argument here by Mikhail Lyubansky on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 8:30:06 PM
mea culpa by Rob Kall on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:08:05 AM
As Rady suggests in Steven's related thread why not by Brett Paatsch on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:37:37 AM
big bear by Rady Ananda on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 1:57:01 PM
Hey!!! Who you calling "common folk"!!! by Mr M on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 3:12:50 PM
who wants to be normal? by Rob Kall on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 7:30:46 PM
I haven't read this closely, but I almost feel by GLloyd Rowsey on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:43:54 AM
I imagine I'm a Richard Noggin myself... by Daniel Geery on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:50:52 AM
Nothing wrong with attacking by Kevin Gosztola on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:57:17 AM
"The individual is not the problem." Sometimes they ARE by Brett Paatsch on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 12:13:35 PM
Agree but by Kevin Gosztola on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 12:49:27 PM
"to personally attack may not yield the results one wants" by Brett Paatsch on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 1:20:31 PM
Alt. views require GREATER adherence to rules of civility by Rady Ananda on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 1:00:51 PM
I think you personally have been doing an excellent job by Brett Paatsch on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 1:36:54 PM
of course there are times ... by Mr M on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 3:24:10 PM
Rady, I hope this doesn't sound ad hominem, by GLloyd Rowsey on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 2:09:35 PM
your suggestions: by Rob Kall on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 2:39:19 PM
Thanx for this responsiveness, Rob. by GLloyd Rowsey on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 3:59:32 PM
lloyd.... on censorship by Rob Kall on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 7:37:09 PM
"Keep the complaints, observations and suggestions coming". by Brett Paatsch on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 6:52:53 PM
Really? by Chas on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 1:04:47 PM
Yes, really by Mikhail Lyubansky on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 1:24:38 PM
Exactly the point. by Chas on Thursday, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:58:33 PM
Okay, I'll Bite... by Richard Volaar on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 9:23:51 PM
You have the right... by Chas on Thursday, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:06:28 PM
Rady, what would I/We do without you by Linda Milazzo on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 1:06:43 PM
thanks, sister by Rady Ananda on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 1:36:30 PM
Agreeing on how to argue by Gustav Wynn on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 1:27:22 PM
Guilty as charged by virginius "gin" arnold on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 2:57:49 PM
I agree by Adam Bessie on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 4:03:52 PM
well by Anthony Wade on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 4:04:08 PM
As much as I loathe ad hominem attacks, I hate lectures more by Melody Clark on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 4:22:27 PM
Ad Hominem for dummies by Debbie Scally on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 4:28:29 PM
the queue's yours! by Rady Ananda on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 8:11:48 PM
Great reminder - thank you! by Jim Finley on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 4:42:41 PM
Excellent by Mad Jayhawk on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 4:53:06 PM
I disagree on one point by Steven Leser on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 5:19:31 PM
For an example, see the following: by Steven Leser on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 5:34:30 PM
Damn by virginius "gin" arnold on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 6:07:21 PM
yeah, it can get pretty snarky in here... by Rady Ananda on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 5:56:36 PM
I am sure you have a point by Paula Sayles on Wednesday, Jan 7, 2009 at 9:08:07 AM
the power of logic and rhetoric by mary sunshine on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 5:15:13 PM
Mary, if it wasn't obvious that, that comment was ... by Mr M on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:36:41 PM
Thanks for a great article, Rady! by Meryl Ann Butler on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 5:26:45 PM
people will disagree with a writer's theme/premise by Rady Ananda on Friday, Jan 9, 2009 at 1:01:16 PM
and thank you! by Meryl Ann Butler on Friday, Jan 9, 2009 at 9:46:42 PM
A sword that cuts both ways by Rady Ananda on Saturday, Jan 10, 2009 at 9:17:27 AM
language by William Whitten on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 5:56:49 PM
battle of words by Rady Ananda on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 6:26:56 PM
I've been banned... by Steve Consilvio on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 6:22:21 PM
sweet! by Rady Ananda on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 8:19:59 PM
..ban him ... by Mr M on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 9:43:11 PM
An ad hominem attack should be seen as bait. by John Hanks on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 6:25:10 PM
Please read the article again John by Rob Kall on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 7:44:54 PM
I don't know ... by Mr M on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 9:33:05 PM
Many Thanks by Kenneth Barr on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 7:18:55 PM
Thanks John...Phew! it was getting so warm and fuzzy I by Patrick Lafferty on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 7:55:20 PM
modest modification by Joy Sabl on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 7:57:47 PM
fabulous illustration by Mikhail Lyubansky on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 8:39:58 PM
debate is not just about logic by Rady Ananda on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 8:35:47 PM
Apples n Oranges by Nick Lento on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 9:23:15 PM
Let's Dig A Litle Deeper... by Nick Lento on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 8:59:02 PM
(Insert Ad Hominem Comment Here) by Theresa "Darklady" Reed on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 9:13:39 PM
Jesus H Christ ... why aren't WE running this country?! by Mr M on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 9:27:47 PM
Wait for me by virginius "gin" arnold on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 10:12:12 PM
Does this mean that I will no longer be called mentally ill by daveys on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:53:01 PM
ummm no davey by jersey girl on Wednesday, Jan 7, 2009 at 5:55:23 AM
No sorry... pal by Patrick Lafferty on Wednesday, Jan 7, 2009 at 1:24:19 PM
Your new job by Dave Kisor on Wednesday, Jan 7, 2009 at 12:23:35 AM
Rady - TREMENDOUS by Michael Collins on Wednesday, Jan 7, 2009 at 12:53:23 AM
I love your bias by Rady Ananda on Wednesday, Jan 7, 2009 at 7:11:21 AM
Learned somehing new by Susanna Astarte on Wednesday, Jan 7, 2009 at 2:03:48 AM
Well, words like rape and whore have many more meanings by Alexis Knapp on Wednesday, Jan 7, 2009 at 9:43:06 AM
Ad hominem by Andrew Fletcher on Wednesday, Jan 7, 2009 at 10:02:38 AM
Hmmm... by Tom Murphy on Wednesday, Jan 7, 2009 at 10:49:44 AM
Amen by Chas on Thursday, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:24:42 PM
This Article is Right On Time by Paula Sayles on Wednesday, Jan 7, 2009 at 12:52:05 PM
thanks paula by Rady Ananda on Wednesday, Jan 14, 2009 at 6:45:40 PM
My Compliments to this Noble Thread by Lover of Truth on Wednesday, Jan 7, 2009 at 1:40:31 PM
What can I say about Karl Rove? by Patrick Lafferty on Wednesday, Jan 7, 2009 at 7:52:18 PM
a new way of discussing--two parts by MJ Creech on Wednesday, Jan 7, 2009 at 2:50:06 PM
Sometimes logic, or logic alone, is overrated by Brett Paatsch on Friday, Jan 9, 2009 at 9:02:03 PM
dealing with the emotional and spiritual-based by MJ Creech on Wednesday, Jan 7, 2009 at 2:59:39 PM
Tom said: by daveys on Thursday, Jan 8, 2009 at 1:00:41 AM
*sighs* by Tom Murphy on Friday, Jan 9, 2009 at 9:33:51 AM
no guise here by Rady Ananda on Friday, Jan 9, 2009 at 2:44:41 PM
Ad hominem is only one impediment Tom, to concentrate on it by Brett Paatsch on Friday, Jan 9, 2009 at 9:16:34 PM
the latest mammal to chime in by Rady Ananda on Thursday, Jan 8, 2009 at 1:03:58 AM
there are so many bad ways to argue by kenshin on Thursday, Jan 8, 2009 at 1:06:56 AM
Back off, man. I'm a Mastermind... by Tom Murphy on Friday, Jan 9, 2009 at 2:03:27 PM
Another Mastermind by Rady Ananda on Friday, Jan 9, 2009 at 2:29:47 PM
by the time one moves onto the internet and into a thread by Brett Paatsch on Friday, Jan 9, 2009 at 8:53:52 PM
ah, the clarification makes sense by Rady Ananda on Saturday, Jan 10, 2009 at 12:21:56 AM
Its not a big personality shift if one is near the centre by Brett Paatsch on Saturday, Jan 10, 2009 at 9:03:10 PM
Pfeh, Masterminds by Jennifer Hathaway on Friday, Jan 9, 2009 at 9:38:57 PM
snarky in a funny way by Rady Ananda on Saturday, Jan 10, 2009 at 12:36:17 AM
disagreement by Chester Marzolf on Monday, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:20:58 PM
Re: Okay I'll bite by Chester Marzolf on Tuesday, Jan 13, 2009 at 5:50:39 PM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum