Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 5 (7 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   18 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

A simplified explanation of America's banking crisis and how it might be fixed

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 2 of 8 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 4   Must Read 1   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 1/15/11

Become a Fan
  (109 fans)

Along comes Caitlin, who says:   "I need to borrow 100 bucks, to buy a doll house."

Banker Bobby quickly replies:    I'll give you the 100 bucks in my bank, but on one condition.   You have to pay me back at a higher interest rate than what I'm paying Alex.   That way I can make some money.   So, let's say you pay 6% interest.

Caitlin agrees and the 100 changes hands.

Banker Bobby marvels to himself, "I'm in business.   This is great.   I'm getting 6% from Caitlin.   I pay 3% to Alex, and I get to keep the difference.   Now let me get some more depositors and some more borrowers."

At a fundamental level, banking is really this simple.   You pay your depositors a low rate, and then you lend out money at a higher rate, and you keep the difference.  

So with that preparation, let's now look at the world's simplest bank balance sheet.  

Picture a piece of paper with a line drawn down the middle.   On the right side is Banker Bobby's ten dollars, the ten bucks that he started the bank with, plus the 90 bucks he got from Alex.   On the left side ...   is the 100 bucks he gave to Caitlin.   If you notice, both sides are equal.   Ninety plus ten on the right side, equals a hundred on the left side.   And that's why they call it a balance sheet.   Both sides have to balance.

Ok, now some jargon, to prepare us for real banking.   Banker Bobby's ten dollars?   That's called the bank's capital.   The people that own the bank own that.   And when Banker Bobby makes his profit every year -- you know the difference between what he's getting from Caitlin, and what he's giving to depositor Alex, that profit is added to the capital on the right side of the sheet, that the bank owns.

So year over year, if the bank is well run, the capital gets bigger and Banker Bobby gets richer.   But now the jargon gets completely confusing and backwards because most of us aren't used to thinking like a bank:   The 90 bucks that Alex deposited in Banker Bobby's bank, also has a name, and it's called liabilities."   To Alex of course, it's not liability, it's a deposit, it's his savings, but to Banker Bobby it's a liability.   Why?   Because he owes Alex that 90 bucks, he's liable to Alex for that money.   Alex can withdraw it at any time and Banker Bobby needs to pay Alex interest on it.   To Banker Bobby, it's like a loan Alex gave him.

So now let's gently introduce another piece of jargon... That 100 bucks that Banker Bobby gave to Caitlin?   That's called an "asset."   Caitlin has to pay Banker Bobby some money every month and within 3 years has to pay the entire 100 bucks back, plus 6% interest every year on the amount of the loan that remains outstanding, i.e. on the amount of the loan she hasn't yet paid back, which is referred to as "the principal."  

So, when Banker Bobby thinks of Caitlin's dollhouse mortgage, he thinks of it like an investment.   He gave Caitlin 100 bucks up front, and she's supposed to pay him back 6% on the principal each year for 3 years, or for however long the dollhouse mortgage is agreed to last.   That is Banker Bobby's asset, because Caitlin is legally and financially obliged to pay him that nice return.   And if he wants to, he, Banker Bobby, can sell that asset to someone else, who then has the legal right to collect those agreed upon payments from Caitlin, for the life of the loan.   This is known as selling a debt instrument or just selling debt, or selling a mortgage.

The point to be understood here is that every bank balance sheet looks this way.   On the left side you have assets, and on the right side you have liabilities plus capital.   And they always balance out. And this is true from this very simple hypothetical children's bank in a world with one depositor and one dollhouse, right up to the largest and most complicated bank that has ever existed, Citibank whose balance sheet we will now take a look at.

First it says what they have in the way of assets.   Instead of 100 dollars in assets, they have 1.95 trillion dollars in assets.      

On the other side of the balance sheet, liabilities, 1.8 trillion and capital of 150 billion.   Notice that these two sums equal 1.95 trillion.   Once again, it all adds up.   Assets equal liabilities plus capital.   Both sides of the balance sheet are in balance.

So, here's where things get interesting.   And here's why we had to make sure you understood bank balance sheets first.

Caitlin comes to Banker Bob and says,   "I can't pay my mortgage.   I lost my job.   So that money I owe you, it's not coming."

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Replace the big banks with state banks

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

Several years after receiving my M.A. in social science (interdisciplinary studies) I was an instructor at S.F. State University for a year, but then went back to designing automated machinery, and then tech writing, in Silicon Valley. I've (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

New JFK assassination bombshells

Was Pat Tillman Murdered by an American Sharpshooter to Shut Him up?

The cholesterol - heart disease scam: How the medical-industrial complex is raking in billions at our expense

Two U.S. presidents implicated by ex-CIA black-ops assassin

Four Ticking Time Bombs That Will Soon Ignite a Revolution

The Ultimate Goal of the Bankster-led Political-economic Warfare Being Waged Against Us Is . . . ?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
10 people are discussing this page, with 18 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Legal Liability for Toxic Mortgages BofA is alrea... by Richard Clark on Saturday, Jan 15, 2011 at 8:54:51 PM
...Why the hell should Wikileaks have to do anythi... by Taylor on Sunday, Jan 16, 2011 at 11:18:47 AM
Thanks for this Mr. Clark. A wonderful piece. I ... by Chaz Valenza on Saturday, Jan 15, 2011 at 9:49:45 PM
. . "thirty years of inequality between the 'have-... by Richard Clark on Saturday, Jan 15, 2011 at 10:54:34 PM
Thanks. You are such a great writer and make thing... by Elizabeth Hanson on Sunday, Jan 16, 2011 at 10:16:23 AM
All anyone reading this needs to understand is tha... by Progessive 1 on Sunday, Jan 16, 2011 at 7:28:32 AM
And let me rewrite it in a way that allows me to a... by Richard Clark on Sunday, Jan 16, 2011 at 3:31:35 PM
American corporations are sitting on tons of cash ... by Richard Clark on Sunday, Jan 16, 2011 at 3:34:33 PM
The amount of payroll tax employers need to pay fo... by Laura Stein on Monday, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:26:49 PM
What would happen if all the banks had to own up t... by Taylor on Sunday, Jan 16, 2011 at 11:13:28 AM
I really appreciated the introductory analogy of B... by Taylor on Sunday, Jan 16, 2011 at 11:25:10 AM
and I have no criticisms of it. I would just like... by Paul Rye on Sunday, Jan 16, 2011 at 2:31:43 PM
Where do derivatives enter the picture ? Houses h... by Matthew Peters on Sunday, Jan 16, 2011 at 9:13:45 PM
One correction (keeping it simple means you need t... by M. Umbrete on Monday, Jan 17, 2011 at 1:19:32 AM
I went back into the article and corrected that mi... by Richard Clark on Monday, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:23:00 AM
This is a wonderful piece. Thank you for compiling... by Laura Stein on Monday, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:44:52 AM
I agree with Taylor: we should have just let the b... by Jeffrey Slotnikoff on Monday, Jan 17, 2011 at 5:35:06 PM
. . we would need something in their place to imme... by Richard Clark on Monday, Jan 17, 2011 at 7:40:57 PM