Special mention needs to be made about the Taliban as justification for increased military activity on the part of the U.S. in Afghanistan. The Taliban and Al Queada are certainly a repressive menace to the people of that region (and around the world). However, if removing them from power militarily will increase the level of civilian suffering and produces more anger against the west, wouldn't that defeat the purpose? This is a delicate situation and a subject which will continue to require much scrutiny when Obama moves into the Oval Office. As stated before, the Taliban could be rendered far less influential if their drug trade was disrupted and bankrupted by wholesale decriminalization of drugs in the west. It sounds extreme in the context of puritanical right-wing prohibitons and anti-drug propaganda, but any domestic problems caused by decriminalization would be offset by the benefits to national (and world) security.
Finally... my greatest fear is that the progressives and radicals will be placated and pacified because they have tied themselves politically and psychologically to Obama and his cult of personality. It is very important that we do not allow this to happen to ourselves or the larger progressive/radical community. If Obama institutes harmful environmental policies he needs to be called on it. If he expands the police state, he needs to be held accountable. If he fails to deliver on his promises of military withdrawal and/or if he seriously escalates the conflict elsewhere in the region... he needs to be recognized as a warmonger. Serious issues are not going to disappear just because Obama has been elected and we need to make sure that we continue to struggle for justice and environmental sustainability -- whether Obama proves to be working for the same things or not. Optimism and hope concerning Obama is understandable, but let's try not to let it blind us.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).