Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (1 comment)

A Call for No More Amnesty for Criminals

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan   -- Page 2 of 3 page(s)

opednews.com

Trust but verify. That's what President Ronald Reagan advised. It also happens to be accurate.

Hearing criminals account for themselves is in the public interest, because it enables the public to react appropriately and to more skillfully protect itself from similar criminal acts in the future.

We demand justice be sought through our justice system. Anything other than the American justice system is not justice in America. Anything other than the American justice system is not in the public interest of Americans.

Furthermore, enough of the damned amnesty already.

I say, no more amnesty for likely terrorists, who we have good reason to believe killed Americans.

I say, no more amnesty for likely criminal telecoms, who we have good reason to believe have spied on many Americans.

Who is promoting all this amnesty? Who is promoting all this secrecy? It is not the public from what I can see. If they have done nothing wrong, then they have nothing to worry about. Give them full and fair trials. Do it the best way we know how. Don't we deserve it?

It is far overdue to compel all these criminals to appear in a court, a real, honest to goodness American court, with no filtering by military personnel. I love the military, but ya don't belong in my court system, and ya don't have any business filtering people's words in my court system.

Whatever else may be true, too many assumptions continue to exist until the truth comes out in a real American court, an imperfect system, yes, but by far the best justice system on the planet as far as I'm concerned.

The US military is not a neutral party regarding the crimes committed on the day of September 11. The military itself suffered the loss of the Pentagon that day. The Pentagon building is the symbolic and actual headquarters of the US military. It is unreasonable to expect a victim to have the ability to preside neutrally over a trial. Members of the military may still be suffering from the personal loss of that day.

The public must directly hear about these crimes from the criminals themselves. “Keeping the telecoms quiet is for our own good” sounds like BS. “Keeping the terrorist KSM quiet is for our own good” sounds like BS.

I am forced to take a drastic measure: I am calling BS. President Reagan would have called BS. He might have been more diplomatic about it. Not me. Enough already. We are in a state of high-level, official, BS. BS Alert Level Orange, verging on Red.

We should let the chips fall where they may, depending on what the accused say for themselves in front of a real and unconstrained American court system. It is well past the time for the chips to fall, and to fall exactly where they belong. No more assumptions. No more filters. May justice be served. It is time.

No more secrecy for terrorists and telecoms.

No more amnesty for terrorists and telecoms.

It is time to allow the US justice system a chance to work. And please, Department of Justice, do not get busy on citizens like me for talking. Please get busy on the years-old cases of the terrorists and the telecoms.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Reject amnesty for criminals including terrorists and telecoms

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

WARNING: If anybody thinks software and music and movies are the only things protected to the fullest extent of the law, check this: This citizen is protected by domestic law, international treaties, and constitutions. This citizen, and all (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Equal Justice Under the Law by JC Garrett on Sunday, Jun 8, 2008 at 5:28:19 PM