Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   News 1   Supported 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H2) on 11/7/08:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (14 comments)

2008 Presidential Turnout Flat -- How Did That Happen?

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (57 fans)   -- Page 2 of 3 page(s)

opednews.com

All the excitement generated by the campaign, all the efforts, all the controversy generated the very close to the same election figures that we saw in 2004.

Does this make sense?  What about the enthusiasm that the Democrats generated in the primaries.  Primary voters are highly motivated.  They tend to vote in very high numbers in the general election following the primary.

Democratic Primaries:  2008 Primary Turnout More than Doubled 2004 Turnout


The Green Papers:  2008 2004

The 2008 Democratic primaries for 34 states showed 34 million voters, twice as many when compared to 2004.  In fact, the difference between the two years, 17.6 million, is greater than the vote total for the same 2004 primaries, 16.1 million.

This enthusiasm was seen in both large and small states.


The Green Papers:  2008 2004

Both 2004 and 2008 were contested primaries but look at these numbers comparing the two years.  Increases in new primary voters ranged from 0.8 million to 2.0 million.

The same increases are seen in the smaller states.


The Green Papers:  2008 2004

This primary phenomenon was discussed in some detail in Michael Collins: Election 2008 - The Difficulty Stealing It This Time, Oct. 10, 2008

Where Are The Votes?

What happened?  Did the Republicans simply throw in the towel?   Did a big portion of those new Democratic primary voters suddenly forget where the polling place was on Nov. 4?   Or was it something else?

Instead of using the reported vote total as the basis to measure the polls and the observed events, we should ask the question - was the 2008 vote underreported?  Maybe those 34 million primary voters went to the polls and took a friend.  More pertinent, maybe the more than doubling of Democratic primary voters in 2008 was a solid indication that election 2008 would produce another major increase in turnout and total votes?

Moving beyond the political logic and common sense, it's well worth considering the analysis offered by internet poster TruthIsAll. He has modeled and analyzed presidential elections non stop from the 2004 campaign through the present.   By analyzing the assumptions behind adjustments to the exit polls and other data, he's developed a "True Vote" model with which he predicted the following.


2008 Landslide Denied: Uncounted Votes and the
Final National Exit Poll, TruthIsAll Nov. 5, 2008

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

www.themoneyparty.org

Michael Collins is a writer in the DC area who researches and comments on the corruptions of the new millennium. His articles focus on the financial manipulations of The Money Party, the abuse of power by government, and features on elections and (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
14 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Older and wiser have died by Gallaher on Friday, Nov 7, 2008 at 9:27:40 AM
Millions disenfranchised by Joy Keller on Friday, Nov 7, 2008 at 9:35:15 AM
Well, it proves my predictive point: Obama by Double Digits by muservin on Friday, Nov 7, 2008 at 11:10:40 AM
Orange Jump suits by Michael Collins on Friday, Nov 7, 2008 at 11:26:44 AM
Among other things by POdVet on Friday, Nov 7, 2008 at 10:01:30 AM
Education is vital by Michael Collins on Friday, Nov 7, 2008 at 11:40:46 AM
The true record set is the undercount of the vote by Scott Baker on Friday, Nov 7, 2008 at 10:07:04 AM
Yes! by Michael Collins on Friday, Nov 7, 2008 at 11:42:51 AM
There were also those who have been disinfranchised by GLloyd Rowsey on Friday, Nov 7, 2008 at 10:30:16 AM
3.5 million citizens "paid their debt" they thought. by Michael Collins on Friday, Nov 7, 2008 at 11:48:08 AM
Mike. My post reads ambiguously to me now. by GLloyd Rowsey on Friday, Nov 7, 2008 at 3:54:33 PM
Absentee and Early Voters. by weslen1 on Friday, Nov 7, 2008 at 10:46:18 AM
Landslide, yes indeed. Early votes, are in on election day by Michael Collins on Friday, Nov 7, 2008 at 11:45:58 AM
Great work, Michael. Long lines everywhere, but no more by Mark Adams on Friday, Nov 7, 2008 at 6:08:21 PM