Anderson's
investigations and exposes ended in Nifong being disbarred as a common
criminal, which is what he was. (Anderson) is currently writing about
the attempted frame-up of another woman on a false child abuse charge
which is a pay-back from an enemy of long ago, who has brought false
charges. He's exposing that, and I think it takes a tremendous amount of
heroism, determination, and fortitude because I myself have written
about a number of these wrongful prosecution cases. It just really
drains you when you see the brutality of prosecutors and judges against
people they know are totally innocent, and yet they are determined to
destroy them. I just found out one of the most draining things it is to
cover those cases. Now Bill Anderson does it, and does a fantastic job.
He defends the wrongfully accused. Now, obviously, you can't defend them
all. [laughs] There's an endless number of them. I'm sure I've got
other heroes. If you asked me this in advance and I could sit down and
think, I probably would come up with others - but there are three people
right there.
Rob Kall:
Who is John Pilger? Could you
describe a little bit about who he is and why he is a hero for you?
Paul
Craig Roberts:
John Pilger is the famous English documentary
film-maker. I think actually he is Australian, but he lives in England
and has had his career there, and his documentaries are just absolutely
devastating in exposing the evil machinations of the United States
government and the British government. He is a left-wing person, a
member of the real left, the old left that seems to have disappeared.
The places he will go, and the risk he will take in order to get the
story on film is just amazing. I'm surprised he's still alive. He is a
heroic person. We have one of our own. What's his name? Michael Moore.
But Pilger is just .. I'm not taking way anything from Michael Moore,
but Pilger is in a class of his own. To see his documentaries, to read
his columns " in fact, you should get his columns on your site. They are
every bit " they are stronger than mine. They are really good. And the
guy has a sense of justice, and if you read it you can see the sense of
justice and outrage, and the humanity of the man. You know, anybody who
can go through what we are going through without a sense of outrage just
hasn't any humanity.
Rob Kall:
I've got to write
that down.
Paul Craig Roberts:
Anybody going through
what we're going through without a sense of outrage has no humanity.
Rob
Kall:
So, I have one last question. It's an experiment. It's a
new project I'm working on. You're the first person I'm asking this. It
comes out of the blue. I don't know if you're going to have an answer or
not, but I've started a new website that has nothing but a picture and a
headline on it right now. I'm working on putting it together. It's
called http://www.smallacts.org/
There are actually a couple of quotes that I have that are supporting
it, that have been cited by Howard Zinn and Pete Seeger ". Here are the
quotes just to kind of prime the pump:
"Small acts, when multiplied
by millions of people, can transform the world." That's Howard Zinn. And
Pete Seeger said, "I honestly believe the future's going to be millions
of little things saving us." I believe that every day, among the
billions of people on this planet, billions of small acts are done, that
make a difference. And I want to collect some of the significant ones
that have made a difference. I'm convinced that it doesn't (take) an act
of Congress to change the world, Sometimes it can be a decision to say
"No," or to take a small risk, or to engage in an act of kindness, and
that can reverberate across the planet. Do you have any thoughts about
that?
Paul Craig Roberts:
I think it's an excellent
idea. You certainly should pursue it. You see, one advantage of it,
though it has many, is it gets people away from these "causes" - these
mass "causes" that rely on government power to coerce somebody. And it
brings it back to individual acts of humanity. I think one of our
downfalls is these causes, these mass causes like the "war on drugs,"
and the "Child Protection Act." There have been so many innocent victims
of that. All these kinds of mass movements which rely on government
power and coercion (have) helped unleash it, so to come back to
individual acts of humanity (provides) some hope. And there is some hope
there a long-term hope. But, you know, Rob, let me say one other
thing on behalf of your new project: My professor at Oxford was Michael
Polanyi, a famous scientist and also a ".
Rob Kall: What was
his name?
Paul Craig Roberts:
Michael Polanyi
Rob Kall:
Oh, yes!
Paul Craig Roberts:
And
what Polanyi said early on (was), he told me, "Look, all of this concern
with the Soviet Union is behind-the-times. It's over-blown." He's
telling me this in the sixties and the seventies. "This system is
already gone. The symbols of it are still there in place, but it
disappeared with Khruschev's secret speech denouncing Stalin, because
that broke the mystique of the power of the party as infallible.
http://www.historyguide.org/europe/khrush_speech.html
And ever
since then the belief among the top party leaders in communism was
dying."
Former communist intellectuals whom he personally knew
had written in journals things such as, "The Party told us that the sea
was lemonade and we drank it until we vomited." And he said the reason
the Soviet Union collapsed was because the belief in it collapsed among
the leaders. It wasn't overthrown. It died because the people who
benefited most from it ceased to believe in it. So, that type of thing,
that type of an explanation claims that even brutal people with
unlimited power can still come back to a reasonable or moral approach to
things. And so I think that is a very supportive idea for your project,
and it really also sort of mitigates the kind of pessimism you heard
from me today, because it says that even evil people at some point can
have enough. To Polanyi it started with Khruschev's secret speech in
1956 denouncing Stalin. And he said the reason that Khruschev did that
is because the entire top echelons of the Party had come to realize that
they were all vulnerable. Under the way that system worked, no one was
safe except the top leader - and maybe not even the top leader, because
all the others would feel they weren't safe because of him, and plot
against him. And so, he said, Khruschev had to denounce the Stalinist
system. And that once he did that, the whole belief in the infallibility
of the Communist Party evaporated. And, of course, it took its time to
work through, but if you look at Reagan's approach to Gorbachev, he did
not approach it from a neo-conservative standpoint of smiting them, and
knocking them down. He said, we are going to end the Cold War. We aren't
going to win it. We are going to end it. And he was able to appeal to
Gorbachev in terms of good will, and they resolved this on the basis of
mutual good will. And then, of course, once the system collapsed,then
the bastards in Washington started taking advantage of the Russians,
renewed the Cold War, and did everything we promised we would not do. We
brought Eastern Europe into NATO. We are now trying to put missile
bases on the Russian borders. We did everything that Reagan said would
never be done. And so we now see the United States behaving as the Evil
Empire.
Rob Kall:
Yeah, there's a theory that the U.S.
prefers not to capture bin Laden, because he's worth more as an excuse
while he's free, or where his being alive or dead is not known.
Paul Craig Roberts:
Right.
Rob Kall:
Paul,
thanks. We've been going and going here. This has been great. You've
talked about a few things that I think would be great articles: The
collapse of the dollar and its potential for changing things in a good
way is a very interesting piece. If I might encourage you to think about
writing at a different place, in a different way. You've been very
courageous in what you've done and said so far. I hope we see you back
again.
Paul Craig Roberts:
Well, Rob, I appreciate the
support, I appreciate the forums you gave me, and I appreciate your
efforts. As you are a much younger man, you may have more energy to
continue with them.
Rob Kall:
[laughs]
Paul
Craig Roberts:
And I'm not going to say that I'll never
participate again. I'm going to do a few radio things from time to time.
But I'm just going to watch now and see what happens. I'm going to see
how things play, and if I get back enough faith in the power of truth to
be resurrected, I might come back later and try to say something. On
the other hand, maybe others now will take over and carry this on. You
know, sometimes the "baton has to pass," or whatever it is that they
call it, and other people come into the fray. But we have you there, and
you certainly do good, and of course, if somehow 9/11 could be exposed,
if people could simply realize what they are looking at when they see
the buildings, then possibly we could hold an evil government
accountable, and the shock of it would lead to the restoration of the
power of the Constitution. And I think we would see that a lot of judges
would be forced to stand down. We would get people in who are
determined to avoid inhumane means in order to achieve some goal favored
by powerful special interests. But that's the way our system works now.
Of course 9/11 enabled that more than anything, and the myth about 9/11
being done by these superhero Muslims as long as that prevails, then
the government won't be held accountable, regardless of the fact that
they broke the law torturing, and they don't abide by the Constitution.
They took away habeas corpus, due process, and all these other things.
All of that is protected by this myth of 9/11. If that myth gets
exposed, then, like the collapse of the dollar, those two things
either one of them and certainly both together would halt the Evil
Empire forever.
Rob Kall:
OK. Thank you so much!
Paul Craig Roberts:
You're welcome, Rob. Thank you for the
opportunity.
Rob Kall:
Thanks for all you've done.
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11
Rob Kall is executive editor, publisher and site architect of OpEdNews.com, Host of the Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show (WNJC 1360 AM), President of Futurehealth, Inc, inventor . He is also published regularly on the Huffingtonpost.com
With his experience as architect and founder of a technorati top 100 blog, he is also a new media / social media consultant and trainer for corporations, non-profits, entrepreneurs and authors.
Rob is a frequent Speaker on the bottom up revolution, politics, The art, science and power of story, heroes and the hero's journey, Positive Psychology, Stress, Biofeedback and a wide range of subjects. He is a campaign consultant specializing in tapping the power of stories for issue positioning, stump speeches and debates, and optimizing tapping the power of new media. He recently retired as organizer of several conferences, including StoryCon, the Summit Meeting on the Art, Science and Application of Story and The Winter Brain Meeting on neurofeedback, biofeedback, Optimal Functioning and Positive Psychology. See more of his articles here and, older ones, here.
To learn more about me and OpEdNews.com, check out
A Voice For Truth - ROB KALL | OM Times Magazine and this article.And there are
Rob's quotes, here.
To Watch me on youtube, having a lively conversation with John Conyers, Chair of the House Judiciary committee, click
here Now, wouldn't you like to see me on the political news shows, representing progressives. If so, tell your favorite shows to bring me on and refer them to this youtube video
My radio show, The Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show, runs 9-10 PM EST Wednesday evenings, on AM 1360, WNJC and is archived at
www.opednews.com/podcasts Or listen to it streaming, live at
www.wnjc1360.com
Rob also host a health/mind/body/heart/spirit radio show-- the Rob Kall Futurehealth radio show. Check out podcasts from it at
futurehealth.org/podcastsFollow me on Twitter
A few declarations.
-While I'm registered as a Democrat, I consider myself to be a dynamic critic of the Democratic party, just as, well, not quite as much, but almost as much as I am a critic of republicans.
-My articles express my personal opinion, not the opinion of this website.
Recent press coverage in the Wall Street Journal:
Party's Left Pushes for a Seat at the Table
(Or you can
set your preferences to show all comments, always)