Life Arts

10 Reasons not to Read This (Political Edition)

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H4 1/24/11

Become a Fan
  (20 fans)
- Advertisement -


C'mon! Can't you read the sign? by commons


1. The author is a white male, a group whose voice is vastly overrepresented in the media. Instead of reading yet another piece from a white male perspective, why not read something written by those whose voices are either not heard or marginalized.

2. Chances are, if you're reading this, you're doing so on a progressive political website.  Research shows, if you want to be happy, that's a terrible place to spend your time. FOX news is much more happiness-inducing. Why are you still here?

3.  Speaking of odds, what are the chances that this is actually an original idea that hasn't been done many times over? There are apparently over 126 million blogs on the internet. If the average blogger has 10 posts (this is an obvious under-estimate, but I don't want to do hard math), then there are over 1.26 billion individual posts.  With that many posts, not only is it highly unlikely that this is an original idea, it's highly unlikely that there are any original ideas left at all.

4. There are two possibilities: You're either already familiar with my writing or you've never heard of me. In the case of the former, you probably already know my point of view and my sense of humor, so why bother reading yet another piece? In the case of the latter, why would you want to take your chances reading someone you never heard of. Don't you know how much junk there is on the internet?

5.  The title of this piece is clearly manipulative reverse psychology. Are you the type of person that wants to be manipulated?

6.  In the time that it took you to read this far, you could have written three tweets and "liked" at least a half dozen facebook posts.  You're never going to get these five minutes of your life back. Never!

7. Reading may sometimes be good for the brain (not in this case, of course), but it's certainly bad for your eyes. Think about the heavy readers you know who are "older".  They all wear glasses, don't they?  I'm not making this up.

8. Besides your friends, the internet is the #1 source of misinformation.  The less you read, the better informed you'll be. By the way, the "fact" above is actually a myth .

- Advertisement -

9. Sure, reading this might seem harmless, but consider the butterfly effect . Anything could happen. Like, for instance, you could read something that challenges a deeply held belief, creating intense cognitive dissonance , which in turn triggers an existential crisis that takes months of therapy to work through.  Isn't such potential danger better avoided?

10.  Reading this might inspire you to comment, which is sure to elicit some responses. You know how that plays out. Of course, you do.

___________________________________________

For more racial analysis of news and popular culture, join the | Between The Lines |   Facebook page and follow Mikhail on Twitter .

  This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License .

- Advertisement -

 

http://internal.psychology.illinois.edu/~lyubansk/

Mikhail Lyubansky, Ph.D., is a member of the teaching faculty in the Department of Psychology at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, where he teaches Psychology of Race and Ethnicity, Theories of Psychotherapy, and a graduate-level restorative justice practicum based at a youth detention center. An autobiographical essay of Mikhail's interests in race relations and basketball is available here.

Since 2009, Mikhail has been learning, facilitating, evaluating, and supporting others in the U.S. in learning about Restorative Circles, a restorative practice developed in Brazil by Dominic Barter and his associates. In addition to conflict and restorative practices, Mikhail also has a long-standing interest (going back about 20 years) in race and (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Ten Things Everyone Should Know About White Privilege Today

The Color of Blood: Racial Dynamics in Harry Potter (Part 2)

Japan's "civilized" response to the earthquake and tsunami has inspired all the wrong questions

A Few Words In Defense of the N-Word, in the Novels of Mark Twain

On 9-11, patriotism, and the U.S. flag

Gates and Crowley: It May Not Be Racist, But It Is Most Certainly Racial

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Mikhail gives the number of 1.3 billion posts on t... by Al Rodbell on Monday, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:20:59 AM