Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ;  (less...)
Add to My Group
February 18, 2008 at 01:46:26

View Ratings | Rate It

Finally! Constitution Wins, GOP Fearmongering Loses In Terror War

by Skeeter Sanders     Page 1 of 3 page(s)

www.opednews.com

Tell A Friend

House Democrats Stand Firm and Refuse to Reward Telecom Firms With Immunity From Lawsuits for Turning Over Customer Records to the Government Without Court Warrants, in Violation of the Fourth Amendment; GOP Walkout Proves Beyond Doubt Republicans' Disregard for the Bill of Rights in the War on Terror



If there were any lingering doubts that the Republican Party in 2008 bears no resemblance to the Republican Party that was co-founded in 1854 as an anti-slavery, pro-human-rights party, those doubts were removed in dramatic fashion last week.

In a display that revealed just how far the GOP has strayed from its original purpose, Republican members of the House of Representatives staged a walkout Thursday after House Democrats refused to bring up for a vote a bill to extend the controversial Protect America Act that authorized the Bush administration to implement electronic surveillance on suspected terrorists' telephone and Internet communications with Americans without court warrants.

Bush objected to extending the Protect America Act unless it contained a provision shielding telecommunications companies from invasion-of-privacy lawsuits stemming from the companies' turning over their customer records to the government without first requiring the government to produce court warrants.


That provision is unconstitutional on its face. It deprives the American people of their First Amendment right to petition their government -- in this case, the court system -- for the redress of grievances; namely, the government spying on them without first obtaining a court warrant nor with any probable cause to seek a court warrant in the first place.

That standard is clearly required under the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution -- which a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court declared in 1972 the government must follow; if it doesn't, then the government is breaking the law -- period.

Bush Seeks to Shield Lawbreaking Telecoms

By failing to require the government to produce court warrants before turning over their customer records, the telecoms violated their customers' right to privacy under both the Fourth Amendment and the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986.

For its part, the government demanded the telecoms and other companies turn over their customer records not with court warrants, but with so-called "national security letters,' or NSLs, issued by the Justice Department. By doing so, the government violated the Fourth Amendment and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978.

Once served with the NSLs, the telecoms were barred under a provision of the USA Patriot Act from disclosing to customers under investigation that their records were being sought by the government. That provision of the Patriot Act was struck down last summer as an unconstitutional breach of the First and Fourth Amendments by a federal district court judge in New York.

As a result of the court's ruling, there are now approximately 40 lawsuits brought by citizens and consumer groups against telecommunications companies that enabled the government to illegally eavesdrop on Americans' phone and Internet communications.

Given the Bush administration's penchant for secrecy, lawsuits against the telecoms are the only way to obtain disclosure about the facts from the government. Information being sought includes details about the origins of the program.

The administration admitted that the sweeping domestic surveillance originated in the wake of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. However, declassified documents obtained by the National Security Archive and testimony that is part of these lawsuits suggest the National Security Agency program was put into place shortly after Bush took office -- months before 9/11.

GOP Bullying Tactics Backfire in House

The White House and Capitol Hill Republicans went on a public-relations offensive in a naked attempt to bully Democrats into putting off the requirement that the government go to the FISA Court for warrants. While Senate Democrats, who hold a precarious one-seat majority blinked, House Democrats, with a much firmer 32-seat majority, stood their ground and refused to budge.

That-- combined with a vote by House Democrats to hold two White House aides in contempt of Congress for refusing to testify in the firings of nine U.S. attorneys for allegedly political reasons -- prompted House Republicans to stage their walkout.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

http://www.skeeterbitesreport.com

I'm a native of New York City who's called the Green Mountain state of Vermont home since the summer of 1994. A former freelance journalist, I'm a fiercely independent freethinker who's highly skeptical of authority figures -- especially when (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "Communications Constitution In Crisis"
The Modern Presidency and Crisis Rhetoric (Praeger Series in Political Communication)

$119.95
Lowest New Price $65.00

Number of pages: 288
Publisher: Praeger Publishers

Presidential Crisis Rhetoric and the Press in the Post-Cold War World
by Jim A. Kuypers

$115.00
Lowest New Price $44.50

Number of pages: 264
Publisher: Praeger Publishers

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
6 comments


It only took 8 years.....

for the House to grow a set....NOW let keep using them.

by Michael Morris (20 articles, 0 quicklinks, 16 diaries, 316 comments [4 recommended, 1 rejected]) on Monday, Feb 18, 2008 at 8:16:14 AM

Recommend  (0+)

It's about time

It's about time.  I'm still watching Congress - waiting for the Impeachment poll results and then to see what they are going to do.  Alternative news sources like OpEd and turning off the MSM are having an impact - let's keep the momentum growing.

The choices in candidates for 2008 are disappointing - let's hope that progressive movement continues to grow in size, strength and breadth and pushes change beyond what they are currently offering.

Nice to see Congress acting, I'd still like to do some "HOUSE" cleaning in favor of more progressive candidates. 

by August Adams (11 articles, 0 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 585 comments [11 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Monday, Feb 18, 2008 at 11:53:52 AM

Recommend  (0+)

Reply: Impeachment Is No Longer An Option. . .

With only 11 months left in the Bush-Cheney regime's time in office, it's too late to begin impeachment proceedings now. By the time an impeachment vote is taken for a Senate trial, it'll be Inauguration Day for Bush's successor.

by Skeeter Sanders (32 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 78 comments) on Tuesday, Feb 19, 2008 at 12:59:13 AM

Recommend  (0+)

isn't it a little early

to declare victory?  Why do we expect them to return and not cave in once again? 

We have to keep up the pressure and let them know incumbents are not immune to defeat and that liberty is our top priority.

by Laudyms (0 articles, 1142 quicklinks, 10 diaries, 708 comments [138 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Monday, Feb 18, 2008 at 1:47:50 PM

Recommend  (0+)

Bush still "crying Wolf"

We Americans have concluded that Bush's "Cry Wolf" is old, tired, and toothless, and we generally ignore it. We remember that there was no lack of information regarding the pending attacks on 9/11. There was simply a lack of follow-through, perhaps due to too MUCH information?
One might ask, why is all this information gathering necessary? What is done with it? Who reads it? Analyzes it? By what means is any one message deemed of importance? How is it used? Isn't there a very real danger – as with the 9/11 data – that evidence of real threats will be lost amidst the millions and billions of e-mail messages the government is insisting it needs to monitor?
Or is it all one more part of "Cry Wolf"?
lmarndt

by L.M. Arndt (3 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 54 comments [1 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Monday, Feb 18, 2008 at 4:41:28 PM

Recommend  (0+)

they will cave

They will cave once again.  They all voted for the Patriot Act, and the Homegrown Terrorism Act, which will help them prosecute Anti-War, and other Govt Dissentors.

Paul voted with them because the FISA court should not be abused to infringe on our rights.  However, I expect the Dems will cave if they are thrown the right bone, and get their way on some of their other money spending habits.

by Highstreet (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 26 comments) on Monday, Feb 18, 2008 at 11:25:45 PM

Recommend  (0+)

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Photo Essay: Thoughts for the Fourth of July: Talking the Talk and Walking the Walk for Peace by Mac McKinney

Rothschild's Federal Reserve Must Be Abolished by Allen L Roland

Health Insurance Exec Whistleblower Wendell Potter Testifies Before Congress by Wendell Potter

Obama Has No Legal Authority For Afghan War by Sherwood Ross

Dept. of State Spokesman Addresses McKinney's Capture by Meryl Ann Butler

Hypocritical Repugnicans Owe WJ Clinton an Apology by David Gray

Torture on the 4th of July by Lawrence Gist

Our Nation has a Great Deal to Learn from Phillip Butler about Morality, Law, and Torture by Lawrence Gist

A Not-So-Glorious Fourth Posted by Josh Mitteldorf

Capricorn Full Moon Eclipse 2009 by Cathy Lynn Pagano

Go To Top 50 Most Popular

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum