OpEdNews - Article: Finally! Constitution Wins, GOP Fearmongering Loses In Terror War

House Democrats Stand Firm and Refuse to Reward Telecom Firms With Immunity From Lawsuits for Turning Over Customer Records to the Government Without Court Warrants, in Violation of the Fourth Amendment; GOP Walkout Proves Beyond Doubt Republicans' Disregard for the Bill of Rights in the War on Terror

If there were any lingering doubts that the Republican Party in 2008 bears no resemblance to the Republican Party that was co-founded in 1854 as an anti-slavery, pro-human-rights party, those doubts were removed in dramatic fashion last week.

In a display that revealed just how far the GOP has strayed from its original purpose, Republican members of the House of Representatives staged a walkout Thursday after House Democrats refused to bring up for a vote a bill to extend the controversial Protect America Act that authorized the Bush administration to implement electronic surveillance on suspected terrorists' telephone and Internet communications with Americans without court warrants.

Bush objected to extending the Protect America Act unless it contained a provision shielding telecommunications companies from invasion-of-privacy lawsuits stemming from the companies' turning over their customer records to the government without first requiring the government to produce court warrants.

That provision is unconstitutional on its face. It deprives the American people of their First Amendment right to petition their government -- in this case, the court system -- for the redress of grievances; namely, the government spying on them without first obtaining a court warrant nor with any probable cause to seek a court warrant in the first place.

That standard is clearly required under the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution -- which a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court declared in 1972 the government must follow; if it doesn't, then the government is breaking the law -- period.

Bush Seeks to Shield Lawbreaking Telecoms

By failing to require the government to produce court warrants before turning over their customer records, the telecoms violated their customers' right to privacy under both the Fourth Amendment and the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986.

For its part, the government demanded the telecoms and other companies turn over their customer records not with court warrants, but with so-called "national security letters,' or NSLs, issued by the Justice Department. By doing so, the government violated the Fourth Amendment and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978.

Once served with the NSLs, the telecoms were barred under a provision of the USA Patriot Act from disclosing to customers under investigation that their records were being sought by the government. That provision of the Patriot Act was struck down last summer as an unconstitutional breach of the First and Fourth Amendments by a federal district court judge in New York.

As a result of the court's ruling, there are now approximately 40 lawsuits brought by citizens and consumer groups against telecommunications companies that enabled the government to illegally eavesdrop on Americans' phone and Internet communications.

Given the Bush administration's penchant for secrecy, lawsuits against the telecoms are the only way to obtain disclosure about the facts from the government. Information being sought includes details about the origins of the program.

The administration admitted that the sweeping domestic surveillance originated in the wake of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. However, declassified documents obtained by the National Security Archive and testimony that is part of these lawsuits suggest the National Security Agency program was put into place shortly after Bush took office -- months before 9/11.

GOP Bullying Tactics Backfire in House

The White House and Capitol Hill Republicans went on a public-relations offensive in a naked attempt to bully Democrats into putting off the requirement that the government go to the FISA Court for warrants. While Senate Democrats, who hold a precarious one-seat majority blinked, House Democrats, with a much firmer 32-seat majority, stood their ground and refused to budge.

1 | 2 | 3

http://www.skeeterbitesreport.com

I'm a native of New York City who's called the Green Mountain state of Vermont home since the summer of 1994. A former freelance journalist, I'm a fiercely independent freethinker who's highly skeptical of authority figures -- especially when (more...)

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author

Contact Editor

View Authors' Articles