Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ;
Add to My Group
February 21, 2007 at 12:22:04

View Ratings | Rate It

White House and Pentagon Cowards Betray Real War Heroes, Again, Failing to Support the Troops

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By Rob Kall (about the author)     Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: Rob Kall - Writer

White House and Pentagon Cowards Betray Real War Heroes, Again, Failing to Support the Troops

Real war heroes-- the kinds who demonstrate incredible courage and the face of death-- have not been recognized by the Bush Pentagon. It's another way the troops have been let down and not supported by those who claim to support them.

Newsweek has a great article, Medal Shortage discussing the fact that only two medals of honor have been awarded since the war began, and both of them have been posthumous and took two years to award.


The medal of honor is the highest recognition of heroism America offers it's war veterans. In a time when the media and politicians are quick to call anyone who enlists or is called up to fight in Iraq a hero, it's strange that no living soldiers have been awarded the medal.

The Newsweek article reports,
Still, criticism over the scant number of medals awarded led the Pentagon to review the citation process; findings are expected in the coming week. One of the most vocal critics has been Joseph Kinney, a 57-year-old Vietnam veteran from North Carolina, who says the dearth of medals has a demoralizing effect. Kinney, who has testified before Congress on the issue, spoke with NEWSWEEK's Dan Ephron.

NEWSWEEK: Why are we seeing fewer medals?
Joseph Kinney: I personally believe they (the administration) were terrified of doing anything that would make this look like a real war. I'm convinced they didn't want people knowing how lucky they were from the start. And I think they were doing everything they could to make this look like a little police action and not a real war-- It's a travesty these people were not recognized.


This is an interesting situation. Four years of war, over a half million GIs fighting, and the Pentagon only feels two dead soldiers are worthy of medals of honor. This may seem like a slur upon all those soldiers. The military argues that they don't want to give medals to people they may have to take them back from. This brings to mind, in the first days and weeks of the war, when Jessica Lynch was first lauded as a hero, only to have the truth come out that she survived. Wikipedia gives this account:
Months after returning, Lynch finally began speaking to the public. Her statements tended to be sharply critical of the original story presented by the Pentagon. When asked about her hero status, "That wasn't me. I'm not about to take credit for something I didn't do... I'm just a survivor."

She denied the claims that she fought until being wounded, reporting that her weapon jammed immediately, and that she could not have done anything anyway. Interviewed with Diane Sawyer, Lynch stated, concerning the Pentagon: "They used me to symbolize all this stuff. It's wrong. I don't know why they filmed [my rescue] or why they say these things". She also stated "I did not shoot, not a round, nothing. I went down praying to my knees. And that's the last I remember." She reported excellent treatment in Iraq, and that one person in the hospital even sang to her to help her feel at home.


Maybe this incident also chastened the Pentagon and or the Bush administration to take an extra cautious policy on awarding medals.


Newsweek asks Kinney, "How do you define courage? What makes a person fall on a grenade?"

His answer is eminently quotable;
There's no manual on being courageous. It's like art. You recognize when you see it.

In response to his Newsweek interviewer's comment that this is a different era, a different war, without a draft, Kinney replies,
"If we had some heroes to celebrate, it would put more of a face on this war. We'd be able to understand more about what's going on. The war is pretty abstract. It's hard to celebrate dead people. I remember when our parents got our first TV, watching the “Sands of Iwo Jima.” There were 27 medals at the time awarded there, all within six weeks. We used to have parades for military heroes up and down Fifth Avenue. There hasn't been a military hero paraded in New York in 53 years. We've gotten away from that culturally and I think it's something we ought to think about it."


How to fix the problem? Kinney suggests that combat experienced vets be brought in, more involved, that the Generals are too worried about their careers. That's for sure, Bush has weeded out all the Generals with guts to speak up and advise the truth. All that are left are Generals who say what they think needs to be said to keep their jobs.

This is another example of how the soldiers are being screwed by the Bush administration and the culture of obsequiance and managed image that must be tightly controlled. Just as caskets are not allowed to be shown when they arrive in the states, heroes-- true, examples of exemplary bravery and courage-- are also not allowed to be shown. Real heroes stand out from the average. They also show the danger the risk, the life threatening aspects of being at war. Maybe the military has decided it would be bad for recruiting-- that the lure of having the opportunity to become a real hero is outweighed by the deadly reality real descriptions of the situations real heroes face will be a turnoff to a generation of vido game playing enlistees who expect to go into battle playing heavy metal on their Ipods.

Maybe Karl ROve and Bush's misguided advisors have decided that, like Kinney says, awarding real medals of honor to real heroes will accentuate the fact that this is a brutal bloody war. Maybe the pathetic generals running this war with eyes closed, with all their strings pulled by George Bush and his moron appointees, like Donald Rumsfeld, who "war hero" John McCain has called the worst in history, don't like real heroes getting attention they could be getting.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Rob Kall is executive editor, publisher and site architect of OpEdNews.com, Host of the Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show (WNJC 1360 AM), President of Futurehealth, Inc, (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Book Recommendations for "Heroes Military War"
Military heroes of the war of 1812: with a narrative of the war
by Charles Jacobs Peterson

$35.95

Number of pages: 220
Publisher: Toronto Public Library

The Military Heroes of the Wars of 1812 and Mexico
by Charles J. Peterson

$65.00

Number of pages: 464
Publisher: Jas. B. Smith

The Military Heroes Of The War Of 1812 - Narrative Of The War
by Charles J. Peterson

$27.95
Lowest New Price $25.81

Number of pages: 208
Publisher: Meisel Press

THE MILITARY HEROES OF THE WAR OF 1812 WITH A NARRATIVE OF THE WAR

$55.00

Number of pages:
Publisher: James B. Smith and Co.

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
20 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

Never-ending list by Sandy Sand on Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 1:59:12 PM
How can someone fighting an illegal, immoral war be a hero? by jpsmith123 on Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 5:36:10 PM
You really have no clue, do you? by ardee D. on Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 6:25:36 PM
You really have no principles, do you? by jpsmith123 on Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 7:12:56 PM
I have to agree with the basic principles stated here... by Daniel Geery on Thursday, Feb 22, 2007 at 12:22:38 AM
sticking to the basics by Matt Kovach on Thursday, Feb 22, 2007 at 10:55:23 AM
Shame on you, Daniel by ardee D. on Thursday, Feb 22, 2007 at 11:46:47 AM
Is "Ardee" going to be warned for his insults, or just me? by jpsmith123 on Thursday, Feb 22, 2007 at 4:35:09 PM
Do you realy think anyone pays attention to you? by ardee D. on Thursday, Feb 22, 2007 at 5:21:50 PM
Well you're certainly obsessed with me, chumpy. by jpsmith123 on Thursday, Feb 22, 2007 at 6:52:31 PM
Daniel excuse me but I must add to this by ardee D. on Thursday, Feb 22, 2007 at 5:33:39 PM
A moral quiz for "Ardee". by jpsmith123 on Thursday, Feb 22, 2007 at 7:24:37 PM
You are not Daniel by ardee D. on Friday, Feb 23, 2007 at 10:30:50 AM
Didn't expect a substantive reply from you, chump. by jpsmith123 on Friday, Feb 23, 2007 at 4:42:10 PM
arent you taking valuable time by ardee D. on Sunday, Feb 25, 2007 at 9:58:04 AM
Bad apple's revenge by Fred F on Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 8:30:19 PM
Plenty of Heroes by Rev. Jim Sutter on Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 10:27:15 PM
on heroes etc by Mark Sashine on Thursday, Feb 22, 2007 at 10:21:57 AM
"War Heroes" -- Ugh. Uncritical worship of the military is a by Richard Mynick on Thursday, Feb 22, 2007 at 12:20:11 PM
Ironic aint it by ardee D. on Thursday, Feb 22, 2007 at 5:35:49 PM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum