Tags for This Article:

People (2037)  Rights (1076)  Corporations (751)  Privatization (702)  Trade (413)  Markets (287)  Pollution (258)  Agriculture (158)  Survival (125)  Water Pollution (23) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
April 11, 2008 at 21:28:35

Headlined on 4/11/08:
Water Resoration Act is anything But.......

by Marti Oakley     Page 1 of 2 page(s)

http://www.opednews.com


Tell A Friend

The Water Restoration Act of 2007, brought to you by Jim Oberstar of Minnesota, along with others, gives the federal government complete control over every waterway, river, stream, lake, aquifer, creek, slew, swamp, underground spring and even the rain that runs off your roof.  Why?  Well to better protect you from polluters and to ensure water safety, and of course “national security”. 

 

Here’s the real deal.  Oil which has been deemed the worlds most valuable commodity (remember that word) is quickly being replaced by water.  Water is the new “gold”.  Under the Public Trust doctrine, the government is prohibited from converting something such as water (a human right…we can’t live without it) to a commodity.  It must remain in a public trust, meaning that it is so important to our survival that it should never be subjected to markets, trading or private interests.  In other words, it should never be reclassified as a commodity.  But this Act lays the groundwork for removing from the Public Trust this basic human right which is a necessity, and will facilitate it being reclassified a “needed commodity”.  Enter the multi-national corporations. 

 

What is under way is the effort to classify water as a commodity and not a right. All of this actually started with NAFTA and then CAFTA.  Both agreements, which are not enforceable as they are both unconstitutional have been parts of a puzzle that until recently seemed not to make any sense at all.  Both are focused on giving multinational corporations the right to lay claim to food production whether it is agriculture or animal ranching, to force out family farms, to patent their new “frankenseeds” and put the resulting GMO food on our grocery shelves without labeling the foods as altered.

 

The corporations can now sue the government (and have) if it acts in any way to prevent it from making profits it believes it is entitled to.  This ability to sue for impaired profit making can be the result of environmental regulations, of Federal laws which may prevent the corporations from hiring illegal workers, or issues of eminent domain in which an individuals’ land stands in the way of corporate profiteering and the courts have not acted to protect the interests of the corporation.  The corporation then claims “trade illegal” provisions of NAFTA and CAFTA and our federal laws and regulations are put aside, along with property rights.

 

All that was left to capture from the public was the water supply.  CAFTA goes a long way in establishing the privatization of water supplies, including in-land navigated waters and the right to use and access the water supplies.

 

If the federal government is not able to gain total control of all water from whatever source, it is highly unlikely that water can be taken from the status of Public Trust and moved to one of a commodity, which is exactly what the Water Restoration Act of 2007 will enable. 

 

If CAFTA protections and provisions for corporations and the provisions within CAFTA that put the rights of investors above those of the individual, or human rights, cannot come into play, it will be nearly impossible to expose our water supply to global markets. CAFTA’s primary aim is to protect and promote investors regardless of the cost to individuals or communities. 

 

Water is not only a basic human right, but also a natural resource.  Inland states like Minnesota have Public Trust Laws (in addition to federal doctrine) which maintain the use of waterways for drinking and for recreation purposes.  Every lake here has public water access due to the Public Trust which everyone contributes to in one way or another.  No one can claim land at the bottom of a lake……its commonly held.  No one can claim private ownership of lake fish stocks, or other natural resources resulting from the lake’s existence.  This applies to rivers also, including the Mississippi which runs through the state.

 

The Water Restoration Act of 2007 would federalize all inland and coastal waters from any source.  This act is needed to set the stage for the privatization guaranteed to corporations under CAFTA and would effectively convert the entire water supply from any source into a commodity. 

 

As it is, any corporate agriculture business operating in any area is allowed to bypass water treatment plants, sewage treatment and the associated costs and to tap directly into underground aquifers even at the cost of depleting the water supply to the surrounding communities.  GMO seeds, especially “traitor” seeds require as much as three times the normal amount of water to activate and to grow, but any efforts to limit use or regulate disposal even by monetary assessment have been unsuccessful.  The corporate rights now exceed that of the individual or community.  CAFTA clearly states repeatedly that “investor protections” must be a priority.

 

Using the NAFTA provisions, along with even more detrimental CAFTA provisions, the World Bank along with the United Nations are active in the effort to convert the worlds’ water supply into a commodity to be controlled by private investors via global trade and investment agreements.  If these efforts are successful, water will no longer be a community or individual right and resource necessary to maintain life, but a globally traded commodity subject to markets and your ability to pay.

 

The World Trade organization in collusion with provisions of NAFTA,  have been instrumental in converting water into a tradable commodity and as such subject to international trade policies which favor no one but the giant corporations.  In each instance of corporations attempting to overturn domestic environmental laws or regulations, the laws have been rendered null using the “trade illegal” provisions of both NAFTA and CAFTA which declare that the right of the corporation cannot be superseded or infringed upon by laws or regulations that hinder the amount of profit they estimate can be attained.

 

The World Bank already has established a system whereby credit or loans will not be issued to Third World countries and even less stressed countries, unless they agree to allow foreign investors access to privatize the water supply.  In Bolivia this resulted in mass demonstrations that finally forced out a subsidiary of Bechtel that had privatized the water supply, increased costs three-fold minimally, dispensed with upkeep and left ¼ of the rural homes without access to water. 

 

England has privatized their water system and costs rose 45% overnight, all but skeleton crews remained of the maintenance sector and the quality of water has dropped significantly. 

 

In one Canadian town several people became ill and one died from an ecoli contamination in the water supply.  This occurred after the supply had been privatized, and the owner of the water supply knew of the contamination.  The public was never notified until after people became ill.

 

In March of 2000 at the Hague, a meeting occurred where water executives stated that as long as water was coming out of the tap the public had no right to any information as to how it got there….. Or its quality.

 1  |  2

 

http://ppjg.wordpress.com

Political activist. Former op-ed columnist for the St cloud Times in Minnesota. A member of the Times Writer's Group until I resigned in September of 07. Publisher of my own newsletter via email. The Proud Political Junkie's Gazette (PPJ) is now in 30 states and Canada. I am neither Democrat nor Republican. Neither party is representative of the American people. I say what I think, and mean what I say. I am known for being outspoken. I am hopeful that the American public will wake up to what is happening to our beloved country.......little of it is left.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Spurl      Tag!RawSugar      Shadows Tag!      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
6 comments

56 years on this jumpin' green sphere. Musician. Own and operate a music store to help kids find a possible life long friend. I believe in the soul and the search. Happily married w/ 2 boys. Published songwriter. play bass, piano and gut string guitar. there are no solutions..only alternatives. Ask questions. Listen. Be fair and don't expect. Baseball is a mirror. Don't ask....unless you have time and a sense of humor. Peace is never easy, but worth it. Always.
mikel paul56 years on this jumpin' green sphere. Musician. Own and operate a music store to help kids find a possible life long friend. I believe in the soul and the search. Happily married w/ 2 boys. Published songwriter. play bass, piano and gut string guitar. there are no solutions..only alternatives. Ask questions. Listen. Be fair and don't expect. Baseball is a mirror. Don't ask....unless you have time and a sense of humor. Peace is never easy, but worth it. Always.

corporations are things, not people

     Scarey stuff Marti. Thanx for the heads up.

     I believe that corporations are not persons and possess only the privileges we grant them. However, granting corporations the status of legal "persons" in the late 1800's effectively rewrote the Constitution to serve corporate interests as though they were human interests. The doctrine of granting constitutional rights to corporations gave and continues to give a thing illegitimate privilege and power that undermines our freedom and authority as citizens. While corporations are setting the agendas on issues in our Congress and courts, We the People are not; for we can never speak as loudly with our own voices as corporations can with the unlimited amplification of money.

     The deck is stacked and until we break apart this corporate personhood inequality, the ongoing pilfering of our rights as individuals will continue to be incrementally removed. I do not see how we can stem the tide unless this is addressed and soon.

     peace

by mikel paul (2 articles, 1 quicklinks, 5 diaries, 280 comments) on Saturday, April 12, 2008 at 11:50:04 AM
 


I am a teacher.
And the beat goes onI am a teacher.

A fellow blogger gave a heads up...

that this was on the way.  We need to remember that what is driving this neocon agenda is power and greed.  If they don't think there is a profit to be made, they are not interested.  They will not stop until they control all of the resdources that make up the fabric of humanities' very existance.  Thank you so much for an excellent article.

by And the beat goes on (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 9 comments) on Saturday, April 12, 2008 at 1:32:46 PM
 


Barbara H. Peterson is retired from the California Department of Corrections, where she worked as a Correctional Officer at Folsom Prison. She was one of the first females to work at the facility in this classification. After retirement, she went to college online to obtain a Bachelor's degree in Business, and graduated with honors.

The most valuable thing she received from her time with UOP was a realization that her life's passion is writing. Now her business degree sits in her d...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Barbara PetersonBarbara H. Peterson is retired from the California Department of Corrections, where she worked as a Correctional Officer at Folsom Prison. She was one of the first females to work at the facility in this classification. After retirement, she went to college online to obtain a Bachelor's degree in Business, and graduated with honors.

The most valuable thing she received from her time with UOP was a realization that her life's passion is writing. Now her business degree sits in her d...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Klamath Basin

Hi Marti,

Here in the Klamath Basin we had several "water" meetings regarding the supposedly endangered sucker fish, and the Federal government's water theft several years ago. The fight is still raging, although not as public. When I went to one of these meetings, a government official was there, but I do not remember which one. He made the statement that all the water belonged to the state in Oregon. I went right up to him and asked him if I heard him right. I asked him if he was saying that even the rain water that hits our land is the state's, and he said YES.  In oregon one has to get permission from the Water Master to drill a well for any type of irrigation, so I knew that the state considers  underground water as the property of the state, and one must have permission from the same Water Master to use water from the rivers, but was unaware that the state claims to own rainfall as well. There is also talk of the state imposing water meters on our private wells. I say good luck, we have guns and backhoes.

Anyway, the way my mind thinks is, if the rain and snow that falls on my property is the property of the state, then can I charge the state storage and removal fees for its snow and water? Just a thought...

 

by Barbara Peterson (46 articles, 75 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 404 comments) on Saturday, April 12, 2008 at 1:40:25 PM
 


Political activist. Former op-ed columnist for the St cloud Times in Minnesota. A member of the Times Writer's Group until
I resigned in September of 07.
Publisher of my own newsletter via email. The Proud Political Junkie's Gazette (PPJ) is now in 30 states and Canada.

I am neither Democrat nor Republican. Neither party is representative of the American people.
I say what I think, and mean what I say. I am known for being outspoken.
I am hopeful t...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Marti OakleyPolitical activist. Former op-ed columnist for the St cloud Times in Minnesota. A member of the Times Writer's Group until
I resigned in September of 07.
Publisher of my own newsletter via email. The Proud Political Junkie's Gazette (PPJ) is now in 30 states and Canada.

I am neither Democrat nor Republican. Neither party is representative of the American people.
I say what I think, and mean what I say. I am known for being outspoken.
I am hopeful t...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Access fees too....

Hi Barb!

 

I would charge them access fees too and fines and penalties for storing without authorization from you, and then an easement fee for accessing your property. 

I read the document on the sucker fish.  What a scam!  I agree with you, I don't know anyone who could tolerate the taste of a sucker fish, much less have it considered a diet staple. 

Marti

 

by Marti Oakley (16 articles, 0 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 50 comments) on Saturday, April 12, 2008 at 3:49:35 PM
 

 

6 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

 

 

 

 

Articles
Diaries Members
Products Events
Polls  
  

Articles Popularity:

Momentum Building For Bugliosi's Case Against George W. Bush For Murder
by Linda Milazzo

A Declaration of Independence from the Government of the United States
by Anonymous

Fortis Prediction of US Bank Meltdown a Net Hoax: The Making of an Urban Legend
by Paul Haughey

POW/MIA Families Alleged McCain Assault: Senate Ethics Committee Failed to Investigate
by elliot cohen

Why were 'first responders' de-contaminated at the Pentagon?
by Len Hart

Ex Weapons Inspector: Iran Not Pursuing Nukes, But U.S. Will Attack Before '09
by Jason Leopold

Bush Fulfills His Grandfather's Dream
by David Swanson

Free Energy and the Open Source Energy Movement
by jibbguy

Bible Roulette--Are Ya Feeling Lucky Punk?
by Dennis Diehl

Nader Calls on Obama to Challenge the White Establishment
by Kevin Zeese