Any time two or more people are knowingly involved in the commission of a crime, there is, by definition, a conspiracy. This is not a theory, folks. It's a stone-cold, undeniable fact. So the real question about 9/11 is not whether there was a conspiracy, but indeed exactly who the conspirators are.
It really is this simple:
1) Either 19 guys with box cutters, led by a guy hiding in a cave in Afghanistan, were able to hijack four major airliners, fly them with expert precision (even though flight instructors say they could barely even fly Cessnas), avoid the most sophisticated air defense system in the history of the world and hit three of four targets in New York and Washington, killing nearly 3000 people and thus pulling off history's most spectacular terrorist attack, Or: 2) A rogue criminal element within our own government, with the means, motive and standing to benefit tremendously, both financially and politically, either helped to make it happen or fully orchestrated it themselves.
By the way, about that guy hiding in the cave in Afghanistan that supposedly led the hijackers: In June of this year, when questioned about why Osama bin Laden's wanted poster did not mention the 9/11 attacks, an official from the FBI stated that they had "no hard evidence" of his involvement (Google "FBI no hard evidence").
9/11 Truth Movement Gaining Steam
Nineteenth century philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer said the following about truth:
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
Similarly, Gandhi said this: "First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win."
The importance of America and the world accepting and reacting accordingly to the horrible truth about 9/11 cannot be overstated. If you think it doesn't affect you because you didn't lose anybody on 9/11, or you don't have any loved ones (civilians or military) in the midst of George W. Bush's subsequent and utterly bogus "war on terror", I would urge you in the strongest possible terms to rethink your position.
We must not only be concerned with exacting proper justice for the mass murder of 9/11. We must also be concerned with ending the tide of tyranny that has begun to wash over us as a result of that tragic day, threatening freedom, democracy, and the world as we know it. They who seek to rule us with an iron fist, pretending to protect us by destroying our liberty, must be told in no uncertain terms that we the people thoroughly reject their despotism, in favor of the constitutional democracy that our country has lived by for more than 200 years.
Thankfully, many more are beginning to awaken to the truth of 9/11, and that can only be good. But we have a long way to go. There are, as you might imagine, many websites dedicated to this issue. If I could recommend a single site to point people to in the effort to grow our movement, it would be Scholars for 9/11 Truth. Bookmark it and refer to it often. You will also reach many other sites from there.
The single most influential voice of the 9/11 truth movement is unquestionably Alex Jones. Visit his sites here and here.
In June of this year, Jones conducted a 9/11 symposium that was broadcast multiple times on CSPAN. Put 90 minutes aside and watch it here.
In addition to the Jones symposium and its multiple broadcasts on CSPAN, two national polls have recently come out (one just last week) that show very significant doubt of the "official story" of 9/11 among the American people, indicating rapid mainstream growth of the 9/11 truth movement.
A Scripps Howard / Ohio University poll, released last week, reveals that 36 percent of Americans now believe it is either "somewhat likely" or "very likely" that the government was involved in the 9/11 attacks.
Additionally, a Zogby International Poll, released in May, revealed that 42 percent of Americans believe that the (9/11 Commission and the government are "covering up".
John Perry is a morning radio personality in his home state of Connecticut. He started paying closer attention to life inside the Beltway several years ago, when it became obvious to him that his "representatives" were not interested in helping independent webcasters, who to this day remain under attack and faced with extinction, thanks to the nefarious efforts of the RIAA to maximize consolidation of Internet music distribution. He had been attempting to launch his own Internet radio business at the time, and remains hopeful that someday it may still happen.He says the experience has made him a more responsible citizen, and for that, at least, he is grateful. "They pissed off the wrong guy," he likes to say. He promises to remain vigilant, holding accountable those who promise to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. "Far too many of the people we send to Washington don't take their oath seriously," he says. "It's our responsibility as citizens to let them know we're paying attention, and we're not going away."
Check out his new video commentary format at johnperryonline.com
We have to make sure we always tell the truth.....
You say in the article that WTC 7 was not hit by the collapsing towers.
THIS IS NOT TRUE
I'm not trying to say you're wrong in general, believe me, I'm right there behind you on this, but you can't just post lies and expect to gain traction. It's slips like this that are used to discredit everyone.
There was a big chunk taken out of one corner of the building. Was this enough to cause collapse? Of course not, it wasn't deep enough to affect the internal steel structure of the building.
Keep up the good work!
Jeff
www.wikiprotest.com
by
Jeffrey Henderson (0 articles, 3 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 5 comments)
on Wednesday, February 21, 2007 at 12:48:50 AM
I meant to say "not directly". Some debris from the collapsing north tower did indeed significantly damage WTC 7.
But...Enough for a perfectly symmetrical, freefall speed collapse? No possible way.
Building 6, however (which stood right next to the north tower), did indeed take a direct hit from the collapsing north tower. Despite sustaining massive structural damage and being completely gutted by fire, it did not collapse.
Building 5 was also damaged by tower debris and completely gutted by fire, and also remained standing.
Funny, you never hear any of the "official story" shills talking about these two buildings...
Thanks again for catching my mistake.
JP
by
John Perry (31 articles, 32 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 81 comments)
on Wednesday, February 21, 2007 at 5:06:13 AM
Pretty much sums up exactly what is happening at the moment, they need stopping.
Feel free to upload any media at my site www.mymediascript.com/demo
I am inviting all people that know what is going on to add as much as possible, the truth needs to come out.
by
Tommy (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 1 comments)
on Saturday, August 12, 2006 at 6:20:10 PM
4 comments
How would you rate this?
You must be logged in (if signed up) to do ratings.
It's free to signup! And easy. And takes just a minute or two....
Must Read (
Well Said (
News (
Touching (
Funny (
Supported (
Interesting (
Inspiring (
Valuable (
