Tags for This Article:

Capitalism (575)  Revolution (482)  Economy-Economics- World (456)  Philosophy Philosophical (76) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ;
Add to My Group
September 2, 2006 at 23:26:25

Paleo-Capitalism {WMail #40}

by G.E. Nordell     Page 1 of 3 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 
Tell A Friend

View Ratings | Rate It  

        Ayn Rand's non-fiction book "Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal" spells out her assertion that actual Capitalism has never been practiced in any country, along with what needs to happen to finally implement it. That book – which includes essays by Nathaniel Branden and Alan Greenspan (recently retired chairman of the Federal Reserve System) – was published in 1967. The situation has not improved in nearly 40 years; in fact, the mixed economic system of America is on the brink of collapse.

        Entire industries – the lifeblood of a productive economy – are being moved overseas; most Americans are effectively indentured servants or serfs; the Oligarchy runs every facet of the Culture-Structure; illegal immigration is a growth industry; all but a handful of states have legalized gambling (a non-productive economic drain); and union membership and power are steadily shrinking.



        Prices are raised merely to inflate the Stock Market Casino while wages are lowered, factories closed, and millions of jobs disappear – over two million net jobs are lost since George Dubya became President.

        The anti-capitalism of the Communists is defunct, yet the replacement there is not Capitalism but anarchy and economic tyranny.

        Why has no country or culture practiced Capitalism? What then IS the system of economic practices that you always thought was Capitalism? What can an Individual do to promote Capitalist economics?

* *          * *          * *          * *

        My Webster's defines Capitalism as: "a system under which the production and distribution of goods are privately managed" and also as "free enterprise". The latter is defined as "a doctrine or type of economy under which private business is allowed to operate with minimal government control."

        Still think the U.S.A. is a Capitalist free enterprise?

        Yeah, right!: No FCC or SEC or FDA or EPA or IRS or DEA. No Department of Labor, no Workers Comp, no 401K or ESOP regulations. And more recently we have the NAFTA tariffs and the EEU and don't forget the WMF and the New World Order (whoever they are). And very importantly, the threats to Individual Liberty written into the Patriot Acts, both I and II.

        "Free enterprise"? Hah!

        Capitalism is incompatible with greed. Capitalism is incompatible with economic slavery. Capitalism is incompatible with massively lowered Quality of Life.

* *          * *          * *          * *

        I re-read "Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal" for this essay, and the odd thing about that book is that Ayn Rand never defines Capitalism per se. Mostly the collection of essays by her and a few others are about the bad, bad things done in the name of Capitalism to the American businessman under the then-as-now extant "mixed economy" (with some reference to economies elsewhere).

        This omission provides an opening for me to write down what I see Capitalism is by definition and design, and also to spell out the Working Minds viewpoint.

        In Ayn Rand's Objectivist philosophy, she repeatedly states that Reason gives man the right to exist, and that the pursuit of one's own survival and happiness as an Individual is a corollary right. Without the existence and practice of that right, we are simply slaves.

        That then gives every Individual the right for free [uncoerced] trade for his/her labors – whether physical labor or service work or office work, or management of employees, or the creation of intellectual property (art, literature, gadgets, entertainment). In a Capitalist economy, market controls by government are reduced to the barest minimum, and the open and unregulated marketplace determines the dollar value of each career field or product or idea.

        In a free marketplace, efficient producers and workers will see increased value and demand, while inefficient or shoddy producers and workers will find less and less demand.

THE LIVING WAGE

        Capitalism operates quite differently for workers and for management and for entrepreneurs.

        In Objectivism (philosophy) and in Capitalism (economics), the worker has the natural right to his/her Life (survival); he/she has a right to free trade for his/her labor (the means to survival); and those two rights lead to a third right: a right to a Living Wage. For how can a worker have the Objectivist right to a Life UNLESS he/she can work the legislated 40-hour work week and actually make a living, with the hope of making a better living thru hard work, training, thrift, and persistance.

        (This is absolutely NOT the Collectivist's anti-Reason false right to a living, which concept transfers wealth generated by the workers to non-producing looters.)

        The right to a Living Wage does not exist in America today, and is not likely to be instituted short of revolution. Almost 30% of households in America today struggle along on two jobs to make ends (barely) meet, which is very Dickensian. Either both parents work or one parent works multiple full or part-time jobs, or a single parent works multiple jobs, and all have next to no benefits. In all such cases, the children are without supervision, except by the deluge of mind-numbing input that they get from the Oligarchy-owned media.

        What happened to the free-time evenings and weekends of the past? The Oligarchy took it away by force.

        As an arbitrary interim figure, I say that any job paying less than $10 per hour is not a Living Wage. In fact, such payment is indentured servitude, economic slavery, the only escape from which is death or madness or political upheaval – the 'R' word, revolution.

        I likewise previously defined the arbitrary interim Benchmark figure for executives – if the U.S. President, the 'Leader of the Free World', is paid only half a million dollars (including estimated perks) per year, then how can any executive, any other person on the planet claim to be worth hundreds, even thousands of times the present 'worth' of their able and hard-working employees?

 1  |  2  |  3

 

www.working-minds.com

author / philosopher / revolutionary G.E. Nordell lives & works in rural New Mexico

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 comments

annoying person on the internet
batriderannoying person on the internet

Ayn Rand is humor

The important thing to realize about Ayn Rand is that she is the early-1900's equivalent of Stephen Colbert. She believes what she is saying, but it's heavily loaded with satire.

What else to explain how John Galt should just simply "shrug" and allow the human race to annihilate itself? No self-righteous person would shrug under any circumstances. It's weak and defeatist under the most basic analysis. And it is highly satirical.

Capitalism is an extraction-based model. It requires infinite resources (a mountain of gold) so that "time" is the pivot variable to making a profit. When you put limits on resources, such as the growth of a company on the stock market, capitalism becomes unraveled.

I don't have any problems with the free market. It is the way people connect. But "capitalism" requires capital, and there is scarcely any free capital left in the world.

by batrider (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 8 comments) on Sunday, September 3, 2006 at 6:46:55 PM
 


Computer Scientist
ClawgComputer Scientist

No Subject Entered

Well, who is one of the main institution that uses capital (and increases the interest rates)? It's the government.

How do you get the idea that 'capitalism' depends on infinite resources?

Satire... well, she wrote a novel, i.e. art.

"Objectivism defines "art" as a "selective re-creation of reality according to an artist's metaphysical value-judgments" - that is, according to what the artist believes to be ultimately true and important about the nature of reality and humanity. In this respect Objectivism regards art as a way of presenting abstractions concretely, in perceptual form."

From the point of view of a non-Objectivist the presentation of the 'ideal man' is possibly a 'Satire' :D

by Clawg (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 1 comments) on Sunday, September 3, 2006 at 10:14:54 PM
 

 

2 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

End of the Road to Moronity by Rand Clifford

"Oops, We Meant $7 TRILLION!" What Hank and Ben Are Up to and How They Plan to Pay for It All by Ellen Brown

The Controversy Surrounding Obama's Birth by adeeba folami

George W. Bush Belongs In Prison by Joel S. Hirschhorn

10 INDISPENSABLE BROADCAST JOURNALIST'S WORDS/PHRASES by Vince Williams

Wal Mart Stampede: Where's Woody Guthrie? by 2kiwipress

Arlo Guthrie, Pete Seeger and families at Carnegie Hall Posted by 2kiwipress

Bush White House: That Ain't No Christmas Tree, It's a Chanukah Bush by Sandy Sand

Leading lives of quiet desperation this holiday season by Sheryl Letzgus McGinnis

Vampires in America by Rob Kall

Go To Top 50 Most Popular