Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (3 comments)

Judicial Activism

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan   -- Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

Funny.  The Republicans spent all that time warning us about "activist judges," when all the time, we should've been watching out for an "activist president." 

Remember when the judge hailed Paris Hilton back into court to send her back to jail after the Sheriff of L.A. County had already put her on home confinement?  I recall Robert Shapiro appearing on the teevee somewhere to announce that what the judge had done was illegal.  And yet, somehow, it stuck, and Paris had to eat Cheez-Its for a week, instead of caviar.

OK, Ok, OK!  I'm laying off Paris, already.  There's a greater point here.

The point is, the Honorable Reggie B. Walton, whose judgment of Scooter Libby just got defecated on by George Bush, can do something similar, only easier and, in this case, perfectly legal.

Today, in announcing the commutation of Libby's prison term, George Bush said the following:

I have concluded that the prison sentence given to Mr. Libby is excessive. Therefore, I am commuting the portion of Mr. Libby's sentence that required him to spend thirty months in prison

With a swipe of his special commutin' crayon, Bush once again eviscerated the will of OUR representatives, in this case a judge and a jury.  No surprise coming from the guy who raised the "signing statement" to a high crime and vitiated the will of Congress on more times than I have time to enumerate.  Moroever, George also wiped out the will of the Congress in this sentencing, too.  Congress long ago passed the sentencing guidelines that Judge Walton applied to Scooter in reaching the sentence he imposed.  Judge Walton didn't exactly consult a Ouija board to come up with the sentence.  It was a process of applying the Sentencing Guidelines: the same sentencing guidelines he uses when he sends African-American kids up the river for ten years for having a rock of Crack in their pockets.

George also acknowledged that some portions of the sentence were untouched:

He will remain on probation. The significant fines imposed by the judge will remain in effect.

And therein lies the rub!  Scooter is still on probation.

Judge Walton has the power, if he so chooses, to hail Scooter Libby back into court and revoke his probation, imposing a prison term on this treasonous monster, this liar, this affront to the dignity of the Republic.

Judge Walton should do so, promptly.  Why?  Scooter's probation was predicated on the imposition of a term of incarceration.  In effect, it represents time Scooter would spend as a free man under the Court's supervision once he had served his setence.  Since Scooter will serve no initial prison time, he is not entitled to the period of probation imposed by Judge Walton.    Scooter, therefore, should spend the period of his probation in federal prison.

This is eminently reasonable and legal, and there's not a blessed thing, short of a pardon or another commutation, that George could do about it.  Would George commute again?  Would he just pardon him this time?  Let's find out!  The White House doesn't want to pardon Scooter because that would make him unable to resist a Congressional subpoena.  He wouldn't even have to take the Fifth.  If George is forced to commute twice, there's a slim chance the American People might even notice that the rule of law is being drowned in a pigsty by the Bush Administration.

Beyond that, with Judge Walton being a Bush appointee, how could the right-wing attack him?  If he refuses to revoke the probation, Judge Walton opens himself to charges that he is part of the whole scam.  Please remember that a judge on the Federal Bench isn't supposed to avoid impropriety.  He is compelled to avoid even the appearance of impropriety.  

Failing to revoke Scooter's probation would create an appearance of impropriety that would be cognizable by the Judiciary Committees of both houses of Congress.

If you'd like to send a letter to Judge Walton suggesting that he revoke the probation of Scooter Libby, you may do so by sending him snail mail at this address: 

The Honorable Judge Reggie B. Walton
United Sates District Court for the District of Columbia
E. Barrett Prettyman United States Courthouse
333 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20001

Judge Walton's chambers may be reached by phone at (202) 354-3290
You can send a fax to Judge Walton at (202) 354-3292

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Revoke Libby's Probation

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

http://www.headonradionetwork.com

Bob Kincaid is a founder and host on the Head-On Radio Network ("The H.O.R.N.), America's Liberal Voice. "Head-On With Bob Kincaid" can be heard every weeknight from 6 to 9 p.m., Eastern at more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Re: Legal complications following Bush's commutation by Howard O. Kieffer on Wednesday, Jul 4, 2007 at 12:10:18 AM
It would be best to read Walton's sentencing order by Bob Kincaid on Wednesday, Jul 4, 2007 at 12:25:47 AM
Keiffer's comment that this is a simple issue by Albert on Thursday, Jul 5, 2007 at 6:47:53 AM