 |
|
Add to My Group
|
March 29, 2008 at 09:31:09
War with Iran May Have Begun with Offensive in Iraq by bhwhite Page 1 of 3 page(s) 
|
|
 
|
by William H. White First Offensive Underway The United States military offensive against Iran may have begun with a swiftly escalating series of operations directed against the Mahdi Army, a Shiite militia led by cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, which had been observing a six month old cease-fire. Overall circumstances in support of this conclusion: 
March 28, 2008
* If attacks against Iran are to commence soon, then it makes sense to weaken those forces considered likely to irrupt in response to such an attack: Better to attack those forces first and separately, throwing them off balance and subjecting them to prolonged siege, thereby depleting their assets and revealing their larger weapon capabilities and stores, prior to an attack on Iran itself;
* If attacks against Iran are to commence soon, then it makes sense to force an end to the Mahdi Army six month cease-fire and to establish general conditions of conflict, during which accusations and operations against Iran would appear less unprovoked;
* The recent Bush and Cheney "peace" trips occurred within the planning and operating context of not only the current offensive, but also part of an event platform for operations whose scale and duration certainly extend beyond the forces deployed in the port of Basra during the last week in March, leaving the distinct impression US actions are plan rather than event driven.
Iraqi circumstantial elements:
* Operations against the Mahdi Army are large scale, coordinated attacks: Starting with raids and arrests in the Shiite neighborhoods in Baghdad and following-up immediately by a claimed 30,000 man police and Iraqi army offensive in Basra, which required months of planning and logistical preparation, even if largely imagined;
* The operations were timed to occur immediately after the Bush-Cheney Middle-East trips and before the administration's presentation of its force level plans to Congress;
* The operations were directed against what US and Iraqi governments say are Iranian assets in Iraq: US and Iraqi government officials have repeatedly charged that the elements attacked were those supported by Iran;
* The local police and army units in Basra were bypassed: long considered unreliable, the Basra police and army units, which were expected to melt away in any general insurrection, have been largely replaced (and possibly contained/detained) by units sent from the north in the Iraqi government's single largest military operation;
* Sadr's call for civil peace demonstrations in Baghdad to protest US attacks were met with an unprecedented three day, 24 hour curfew;
* Throughout all of this, US forces have been held almost entirely in reserve, with their likely use to occur as each Mahdi Army element is fixed in defensive positions by the Iraqi army, depending on circumstances, such as hitting Mahdi Army strong points, supporting weakening Iraqi government operations, and killing/capturing Sadr.
* General Petraeus claimed in a BBC interview about the Green Zone attacks, "Tehran had trained, equipped and funded insurgents who fired the barrage of mortars and rockets."
* General Petraeus in a videoconference with the president on Monday, during the briefings reported by officials, recommended taking "up to two months" to evaluate security in Iraq before considering additional withdrawals.
Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
War with Iran May Have Begun with Offensive in Iraq
Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
 Contact Author |
Contact Editor |
 View Authors' Articles |
|
|
|
|
| 7 comments |
|
Sounds Very Convincing
I hope it spins out of control and blows up in the Empire's face, making further aggression less appealing. by Harold Smith (0 articles, 3 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 556 comments [1 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Saturday, Mar 29, 2008 at 11:42:41 AM  (0+)
|
|
I hope the Iranian people would get ...
I only hear the chartings in recent demonstrations in Iran. Voices not echoed- strangely enough, by writers as responsible as you yourself. These voices in student demonstrations and workers and teachers and even in the previous petrol riots have been shouting loud and clear for “regime change!". This, I think is not because some say that lobbies are at work to change this regime. NO WAY. It is merle a repetition of history in Iran. When there is an illegitimate tyranny, then there would be change sooner or later, and no appeaser and no lobby could stop it. by stevehs (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 4 comments) on Saturday, Mar 29, 2008 at 11:51:14 AM (0+)
|
|
Reply: And your point is?
His article was about the U.S. getting ready to make war against Iran, not about people protesting against the Iranian government. by Harold Smith (0 articles, 3 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 556 comments [1 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Saturday, Mar 29, 2008 at 12:10:47 PM (0+)
|
|
we can stop this
thoughts and prayers work --every one of us at bed time should think that the nukes and bombs of this world do not work anymore and will not work again and that people should love each other for this is our world and we deserve a safe and kind world---------------or do nothing and see----- by TRADESMAN (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 12 diaries, 335 comments [40 recommended, 1 rejected]) on Saturday, Mar 29, 2008 at 7:53:09 PM (0+)
|
|
We armed these "enemies" too...
Bremmer made a deal with these same people, paying them 320 million dollars.... Knowing they would use the cash to arm themselves. Another example of the bush regime going out of its way to insure there will be never-ending war in the region. by Steve Windisch (jibbguy) (17 articles, 0 quicklinks, 4 diaries, 360 comments [54 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Saturday, Mar 29, 2008 at 9:15:21 PM (0+)
|
|
Stop whatever else you're doing ...
I don't care what it is, we must stop an attack on Iran! Stop campaigning - stop working - stop making love and stop this attack! It's that important ... by Mr M (8 articles, 0 quicklinks, 66 diaries, 2845 comments [654 recommended, 27 rejected]) on Saturday, Mar 29, 2008 at 11:15:40 PM (0+)
|
|
attacking iran?
While I am very much encouraged by the spirit of solidarity shown here, I must question the conclusions of the article since the current attack on Al Sadr's militia's is basically an attack against Iraqi nationalism. This is a conflict over the coming elections in Iraq, and Maliki is trying to wipe out the opposition before the vote is held with active US support as well as tacit Iranian support. It does not look like a prelude for an attack on Iran. I am increasingly convinced that the US and Iran are working closely together in Iraq despite all the rhetoric. by Niloufar Parsi (4 articles, 0 quicklinks, 9 diaries, 83 comments) on Sunday, Mar 30, 2008 at 1:38:57 AM (0+)
|
Want to post your own comment on this Article? 
|
||||
|
||||||||||||||
Must Read (0) 
Well Said (0) 
News (0) 
Touching (0) 
Funny (0) 
Supported (0) 
Interesting (0) 
Inspiring (0) 
Valuable (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tell a Friend:
|
Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews |
