Tags for This Article:

Iraq (5342) Military (3244) Iran (2542) Democracy (1979) Bush Enemy Of Human Rights (878) Torture (840) Bush Reasons To Prosecute (793) People Dick Cheney (571) Outsourcing (134) Corporations Mercenaries-Security (41)


Populum
Tag Cloud
Control Panel

Fine tune your search to access content

Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
August 29, 2007 at 08:18:32

View Ratings | Rate It

CheneyBush's "Mercenary" Legions

by Bernard Weiner, The Crisis Papers     Page 1 of 3 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 
Tell A Friend

By Bernard Weiner, The Crisis Papers

"Outsourcing" jobs overseas is only the tip of the iceberg. How about the CheneyBush Administration "outsourcing" our military, our intelligence-gathering, our nation's soul?



Taking private enterprise way beyond what is reasonable, or desirable, or safe, the CheneyBush Administration has turned over a huge raft of national-security functions to those not adequately trained, not accountable to the public or the law, not showing up on the political radar.

In short, CheneyBush have created what amounts to their own private legions -- soldiers, intelligence analysts, security guards, construction experts, supply specialists, et al. -- in effect, a "mercenary" force bought and paid for by the American taxpayer.

That's why there will probably be no draft: There is no guarantee of loyalty from those dragooned into service. Besides, many draftees have politically-connected constituencies. But when one's mercenary "volunteer" forces are totally beholden to the paymaster for their livelihood and under-the-table payoffs, they will dance with them that brung 'em.

These are no small numbers. It's estimated that in addition to the 160,000 regular troops in the field in Iraq, CheneyBush control anywhere from 60,000 to 100,000 private assets ("independent contractors"). Nobody's even sure under what "rules of engagement" these guys -- many in security and reconstruction fields -- operate, or whether they are accountable to anyone other than their corporate bosses' and the financial "bottom line."

History shows us the dangers involved when leaders have large extra-institutional forces at their command, such as the Praetorian Guards and Legions of ancient Roman Caesars, Hitler's Brownshirts, Saddam's Republican Guards, the private militias of political and religious leaders today in Iraq, Blackwater forces in control of New Orleans after Katrina, etc. By and large, these mercenaries swear allegiance to their employer, not to the rule of law, not to any constitution. The catastrophic damage done to democracy by the existence, and power, of these private forces can't be over-stated.

News flash: Blackwater, the huge corporation that CheneyBush rely on for most of the non-military functions in Iraq and elsewhere, is buying combat aircraft. ( www.strategypage.com/htmw/htairfo/articles/20070827.aspx ) Do we really want a private air force, effectively operating under the aegis of the Executive Branch, conducting secret ops in our names?

PURCHASING INTELLIGENCE

In America's current case, there is also this ominous danger: Accurate intelligence is an absolute necessity in warfare and war-planning, but CheneyBush are increasingly going outside the usual intelligence channels and hiring private intel corporations. Even with the mass purgings in governmental intelligence agencies of those not sufficiently "Bush-loyal," Cheney in particular doesn't trust the CIA and the State Department's intel analysts, never has and never will. So we get this recent story from veteran Washington Post reporter Walter Pincus: ( www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/18/AR2007081800992.html?hpid=topnews )

>>"The Defense Intelligence Agency is preparing to pay private contractors up to $1 billion to conduct core intelligence tasks of analysis and collection over the next five years, an amount that would set a record in the outsourcing of such functions by the Pentagon's top spying agency.

>>"The proposed contracts, outlined in a recent early notice of the DIA's plans, reflect a continuing expansion of the Defense Department's intelligence-related work and fit a well-established pattern of Bush administration transfers of government work to private contractors.

>>..."The DIA did not specify exactly what it wants the contractors to do but said it is seeking teams to fulfill 'operational and mission requirements' that include intelligence 'Gathering and Collection, Analysis, Utilization, and Strategy and Support'."

By outsourcing, CheneyBush, of course, get the intelligence they pay for, rather than risking that some CIA or State Department analysts might tell them intel-truths they don't want to hear, as was the case with Iraq.


LOWERING THE RECRUITING BAR

How did CheneyBush begin to assemble their mercenary forces for the reckless misadventure in Iraq? At first, they started out with an all-"volunteer" army of sterling patriotic recruits, high school graduates, many from lower- and middle-middle circumstances, not well-connected politically, many underemployed and desirous of a stable career. But the brutality and criminality and constant fear of the Iraq War (never knowing for sure if civilians were good guys or bad guys, U.S. death rates going up, horrific injuries to body, brain and psyche) took their toll on the troops, suicide and post-traumatic rates mushroomed, and recruitment of top prospects plummeted.

 1  |  2  |  3

 

www.crisispapers.org

Bernard Weiner, Ph.D. in government & international relations, has taught at universities in California and Washington, worked for two decades as a writer-editor at the San Francisco Chronicle, and currently serves as co-editor of The Crisis Papers (www.crisispapers.org).

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 comments

10 year Navy veteran,former Federal employee with various agencies,
Gallaher10 year Navy veteran,former Federal employee with various agencies,

Bush isn't the only one.

This was going on when Clinton was in office too.

by Gallaher (2 articles, 0 quicklinks, 3 diaries, 832 comments) on Wednesday, August 29, 2007 at 4:42:25 PM
 


KEVIN STODA has been blessed to have either traveled in or worked in nearly 100 countries on five continents over the past two and a half decades.  He sees himself as a peace educator and have been   a promoter of good economic and social development--making him an enemy of my homelands humongous spending and its focus on using weapons to try and solve global issues."I am from Kansas so I also use the pseudonym 'Kansas' when I write and publish.  I...

to see more of bio, click on member name

ALONEKEVIN STODA has been blessed to have either traveled in or worked in nearly 100 countries on five continents over the past two and a half decades.  He sees himself as a peace educator and have been   a promoter of good economic and social development--making him an enemy of my homelands humongous spending and its focus on using weapons to try and solve global issues."I am from Kansas so I also use the pseudonym 'Kansas' when I write and publish.  I...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Over 65% of budget on Intelligience in all services and bran

According to a recent report and discussion on DEMOCRACY NOW.  Currently 65% or more of our governments' intelligience is outsourced.

Regardless as to whether the Reagan, Clinton or Bushies administration started this trend, IT IS TIME TO TAKE THE oxymoron out of iU.S. government intelligience.

The armed forces and federal government need to to hire the thousands of badly needed but eager young americans applying for state department and intelligience related jobs.

Over 85% of the candidates are turned away because of fairly faulty reasoning or due prejudice against the candidates word view or background--i.e. party politics and indoctrinated intelligientsia ONLY need apply to work at the state department etc.

by ALONE (162 articles, 1 quicklinks, 4 diaries, 420 comments) on Thursday, August 30, 2007 at 1:27:25 PM
 

 

2 comments

 

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Breaking The Real "Last Taboo" - The Things No One Dares To Say by Frank Schaeffer

John S. Greenway by AJ Buttacavoli

Bill Richardson - Kissinger-American by Greg Palast

Who is Black America's Moral Emissary to the World? by Glen Ford

Unlawful Assembly by David Swanson

The End of Capitalism? Not quite, but nearly.... by Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed

Will There Be a Recovery? by Paul Craig Roberts

Americans Have Learned the Wrong Lesson from the Holocaust by George Washington

Cancer Full Moon January 10-11 2009 by Cathy Lynn Pagano

Where Lies Truth in the Land of Lies? by Rowan Wolf

Go To Top 50 Most Popular

 

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2009